• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I'm pretty sure there's no god now

muhammad_isa

Veteran Member
If you think the mind is not physical, or connected to the brain in some why, why is it that when the brain is damage, the mind accordingly becomes altered?

It's well known that mental health and physical health are interconnected. Poor physical health affects our mind, and poor mental health affects our body. That doesn't mean that they are 'one and the same thing'.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
It's well known that mental health and physical health are interconnected. Poor physical health affects our mind, and poor mental health affects our body. That doesn't mean that they are 'one and the same thing'.
A person's entire personality can change them basically into a completely different person than they used to be, just from their brain being damaged. We have no evidence of minds without brains. When a person's brain is dead, they are dead.
I still don't know why you don't think the mind is a product of the brain.
 

muhammad_isa

Veteran Member
You seem to believe that things that belong to our far past, e.g. dinosaurs, stopped existing. I think they still exist. They are located at a certain point in spacetime. Stll there. Or not?

As you say .. we perceive time as a flow from past to present.
Both the past and future exist .. of course, they are not visible to us.
 

Guy Threepwood

Mighty Pirate
Good and evil is what deceived God's people in this first age. The tree of life is what's important to understand but the objects that God's people observe keeps them from knowing their true created existence.

I agree, good and evil are not just evident in things we observe, beyond our control, but in our own actions also. And similarly, an act of good, has no meaning, unless it is chosen over an alternative
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
As you say .. we perceive time as a flow from past to present.
Both the past and future exist .. of course, they are not visible to us.

Correct. They exist, but they are not visible. Or, better, they are not in a causal relationship with us. And causal relationships to some observers do not dictate ontology.

So, what makes you think that the spacetime continuum, and all the events that punctuate it, change?

Ciao

- viole
 

thevoiceofgod

Active Member
Well sir, you ae factually wrong.

Please provide credible sources with links to support your claim

I am not wrong at all. The mind is where all information exists. The brain is a visible illusion that is formed in the mind of each created being that makes him believe the brain is important. We don't need a visible brain to experience life with.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
Good and evil is what deceived God's people in this first age

Do you have a date for this "age" like 2 million years ago? or 5000 years ago???????

The tree of life is what's important to understand but the objects that God's people observe keeps them from knowing their true created existence.

Most credible scholars claim this was not a literal tree, how do you defend against mythological claims?
 

thevoiceofgod

Active Member
Yes you are.

Its why you cannot provide credible sources or links to support you so called claim



What does that even mean??

The brain factually is not a visible illusion.





Factually false.

A brain is required for all life

You better get your facts straightened out. There's a reason scientists don't understand what the mind is even though they've been studying the brain for many years. It's what they observe that deceives them of how we were created.
 

muhammad_isa

Veteran Member
..We have no evidence of minds without brains..

I don't see your brains when I read your messages, I see your thoughts put into words. The computer is doing what it's been programmed to do, just as your brain has.

The computer is physical hardware, and without external input at some point, will do nothing..
That is why I don't think that I'm a 'product of my brain' .
 

AndromedaRXJ

Active Member
He allows it, because there is no good without bad, they are relative terms. We have the gift to be able to know the difference

It's rather very asymmetrical. There's far more suffering in nature than there is pleasure and enjoyment. In fact, suffering, harshness, fighting and killing are seemingly integral while pleasure is just something an organism is lucky to experience from time to time. It's so integral that you have animals like the cheetah and the gazelle. The cheetah's physiology is so fine tuned to run at very high speeds in order to catch the also very fast gazelle. While the gazelle is fine tuned to run extremely fast in order to escape the cheetah. In biology, this is called an evolutionary arms race. One organism evolves something, and that forces another organism to evolve something. In turn, that second organism forces the first organism to evolve that thing some more. Which forces the second organism to evolve that thing further. The process repeats rather pointlessly.

Cheetahs put selective pressure on gazelle populations to weed out the ones that aren't fast enough. That leaves only the fastest gazelles alive. That in turn puts selective pressure on the cheetahs, where only the fastest of the fastest cheetahs are able to catch their main prey while the slowest fail in hunts and die off. That leaves only the fastest of the fastest cheetah's alive which then puts selective pressure on gazelle populations which weeds out all but the very fastest gazelle's alive. Rinse and repeat.

That all fits in perfectly well with a creatorless universe. But if I'm invoking an omniscient creator, he'd have to be rather sadistic to design two fast running creatures where one has to catch the other.

You see this in tree populations too! The tallest trees get the sunlight. That puts selective pressure on other trees to grow taller (the less tall ones die off). Leaving nothing but tall trees. Of course, that repeats the cycle. The point is, broadly speaking, the overall there's no grand point in a certain population of trees to be tall. All it is is each individual tree competing with each other.
 
Last edited:
Top