Incompatibility of consciences

[questfortruth]

I have an M.Sc. degree.
Hence, I am more or less a Thinker as well.
As being the one, I would like to be convinced of making mistakes.
Others might become convinced of my falsehood, but I want to be
convinced as well. I listen to my colleagues, I consider their opinion.
But their opinion has not convinced me yet. Before publication, there
could be an opinion mismatch.

We all have a warrior mentality. Life, as Charles Darwin has expressed,
is a continuous fight for survival. It is not enough to write proof: you
must believe in it and stand for it. The people around me are defending
Clay Institute money as if it were their own.

A human knows only what his conscience is telling him.
My conscience tells me that I have definitive logic with talking about problem.
Your conscience might be a different one. If it tells you that this logic is not
logical, then we have a kind of incompatibility of consciences, not a problem
with logic.

Hilbert's second problem and Riemann Hypothesis

 

[exchemist]

At least this one is not in Cyrillic script.

 

[questfortruth]

At least this one is not in Cyrillic script.

Is it wrong to know several languages?

 

[Altfish]

Is it wrong to know several languages?

No, but on an English language website it certainly limits the audience

 

[RabbiO]

Is it wrong to know several languages?

You’ve not, to date, provided evidence that you are a master of more than one.

 

[questfortruth]

No, but on an English language website it certainly limits the audience

Google and a modern web-browser include automatic translation of web-sites.

 

[questfortruth]

You’ve not, to date, provided evidence that you are a master of more than one.

Let me check, is 2+2 four?

 

[epronovost]

Let me check, is 2+2 four?

The fact that you have used to different grammars to write this equation makes me doubt that you have a mastery of mathematics.

 

[Altfish]

Google and a modern web-browser include automatic translation of web-sites.

My comment still is true, most will not have the time or inclination to translate

 

[Nakosis]

I have an M.Sc. degree.
Hence, I am more or less a Thinker as well.
As being the one, I would like to be convinced of making mistakes.
Others might become convinced of my falsehood, but I want to be
convinced as well. I listen to my colleagues, I consider their opinion.
But their opinion has not convinced me yet. Before publication, there
could be an opinion mismatch.

We all have a warrior mentality. Life, as Charles Darwin has expressed,
is a continuous fight for survival. It is not enough to write proof: you
must believe in it and stand for it. The people around me are defending
Clay Institute money as if it were their own.

A human knows only what his conscience is telling him.
My conscience tells me that I have definitive logic with talking about problem.
Your conscience might be a different one. If it tells you that this logic is not
logical, then we have a kind of incompatibility of consciences, not a problem
with logic.

Hilbert's second problem and Riemann Hypothesis

I find my conscience tells me many things that are not true. Not always but often enough I can't assume its correctness.

So I find it helpful to have others question my claims. Fair enough, just because they question what I claim doesn't mean I'm going to automatically acquiesce, still we ought to consider the reasonableness of the criticism.

IMO, logic shouldn't depend on our conscience. Maybe the priori though. Logic may be able to justify what follows from our assumptions but not the assumption themselves.

 

[questfortruth]

logic shouldn't depend on our conscience.

Nazi Germany followed Hitler without any regrets and pain from conscience. Hence, there are at least two consciences. Human knows, feels, believes, acts only that what his conscience is telling him.
Some conscience can tell two things together: ``2+2=4 and war-crime is good.''

 

[Nakosis]

Nazi Germany followed Hitler without any regrets and pain from conscience. Hence, there are at least two consciences. Human knows, feels, believes, acts only that what his conscience is telling him.

Yes, it's not really that hard to manipulate the conscience of others. Convincing people the Jews are a deplorable people for example. People who can manipulate our conscience can manipulate us.

Some conscience can tell two things together: ``2+2=4 and war-crime is good.''

Well not sure about the first, that's a "fact" that gets taught in school. No one is likely to convince me 2+2=5. The second, sure. The government often uses the media to convince us black is white.

 

[questfortruth]

Well not sure about the first, that's a "fact" that gets taught in school.

People rarely argue with 2+2=4, but a more complicated example of logic can be rejected, despite its triviality.