"Insane" Webb telescope Images

[Native]

Subject: The James Webb Telescope produces sane images.

The big question is if it at last can produce some sanity and natural logics in the cosmological society.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZNeMRUw9rM&ab_channel=EXOPLANET

Video abstract:
Well, the early galaxies discovered by the James Webb Telescope, are not following our physics or the claims made on Webb telescope searches may be false.
Because still, these Webb discoveries have to go through a lot of observations which will further confirm the claims made on them.
But what if these claims turn out to be true, is there really something in these galaxies that is beyond the laws of our physics?
Some scientists believe that the behavior of these early galaxy is different because there are some particles that have not yet been discovered or there is something that belongs to a different universe that we haven't found so far.
So, as some astronomers were saying, if we find some such objects which are beyond the laws of our universe.
Then by studying those objects, we can find the leftover particles of another universe. And perhaps this is the reason why, the oldest galaxies discovered by the Methuselah and Webb telescopes are showing properties different from our model.
If according to this theory we do indeed find particles that are from other universes and played an important role in the evolution of our early galaxies, most of the unanswered questions will be solved.

My comment:
Both the Standard Model of the Universe and of its formational processes are wrong and based on all too many speculative mental constructs and so called “constants”.

I really blame cultural ignorance in historic and modern times for not understanding the Universe. Several thousand years ago, our cultural ancestors all over the world knew of the nature of the Universe:

1) It is eternal, hence no big Bang at all.
2) It´s elementary atoms are eternal and omnipresent. (Representing the old Aether concept and the modern concept of the CMBR.)
3) The universal formation process is governed by LIGHT, i.e., electromagnetic currents and frequencies.
4) The attractive polarity in E&M assembles and binds atoms and molecules in cosmic clouds together.
5) The universal cyclical formation process consists of three fundamental phases: Eternal cyclical Formation, Dissolution and Re-Formation.
6) The Universal and omnipresent Cosmic Webb is the overall active formative strings of formation and is connecting everything by electric currents and magnetic frequencies.
7) The Universe isn´t expanding. This idea derive from false distance measuring methods, especially taking the speed of light to be constant, which it isn´t.
8) Both Newtons and Einsteins gravitational speculations are mental constructs which cannot be scientific explained by what dynamic means it should work, hence they should be discarded regarding cosmic formation and celestial motions.
9) The Electromagnetic force does all the observed formation in micro- and macrocosm.

The basic content in these paragraphs was known by our ancestors several thousand years ago, and it STILL can be understood by interpreting the ancient texts and symbolism in modern terms.

- As long as I can remember, the need for alternate cosmological ideas have been outspoken in modern astrophysics and cosmology, but no real new thinking has taken place. Instead, the old cosmological and some newer thoughts have been patched with all kinds of “dark this and dark that”.

Well, maybe the images from the James Webb telescope at last will force the astrophysicists and cosmologists to reset the entire education of the Universe and reset their mathematical equations and ditto mathematical PC programming and animations based on old gravitational thinking and unnatural constants.

NOTHING is constant as the entire formation in the Universe is forever changing in self sustainable natural cycles.

Native
Comparative Mythologist & Natural Philosopher

 

[gnostic]

4) The attractive polarity in E&M assembles and binds atoms and molecules in cosmic clouds together.

9) The Electromagnetic force does all the observed formation in micro- and macrocosm.

You are still ignoring that like-charged particles and like-polarity magnets exhibit repulsive forces, not attractive forces.

Electromagnetic force don’t control all, especially when complete ionization occurred, meaning when there are no electrons bonded to atoms (or more precisely, no electrons bonded to the atomic nuclei).

If there more protons in the nucleus, then the positive charged protons should be repelling each other, and in an ionized atom, that would mean the nucleus would not hold the protons together, since now the EM forces would force the nucleus to lose its protons.

So what is holding protons together within an atomic nucleus, if it isn’t EM force?

I know that you are still ignoring strong nuclear force.

EM force are not the same as strong nuclear force. Strong nuclear force is so much stronger than EM force, but its range are at atomic and quantum level, not infinite range like EM force.

 

[Native]

Native said: ↑
4) The attractive polarity in E&M assembles and binds atoms and molecules in cosmic clouds together.
Native said: ↑
9) The Electromagnetic force does all the observed formation in micro- and macrocosm.

You are still ignoring that like-charged particles and like-polarity magnets exhibit repulsive forces, not attractive forces.

Of course, I don´t.

But you are overlooking the fact, that both the repulsive and attractive E&M force, for instants in galactic centers, are much stronger than repulsive and attractive forces in a single atom in an laboratory experiment and measurement.

Electromagnetic force don’t control all, especially when complete ionization occurred, meaning when there are no electrons bonded to atoms (or more precisely, no electrons bonded to the atomic nuclei).

This is a contradiction of terms. When something is ionized, it is PRECISELY the E&M force which has been in action.

If there more protons in the nucleus, then the positive charged protons should be repelling each other, and in an ionized atom, that would mean the nucleus would not hold the protons together, since now the EM forces would force the nucleus to lose its protons.

You´re still explaining laboratory experiment qualities here, and forget to put it all in a cosmic formation perspective.

So what is holding protons together within an atomic nucleus, if it isn’t EM force?

I haven´t said it isn´t the E&M force, so why are you asking this question? Do you suggest it should by Newtons gravity?

I know that you are still ignoring strong nuclear force.

No, I´m not.

EM force are not the same as strong nuclear force. Strong nuclear force is so much stronger than EM force, but its range are at atomic and quantum level, not infinite range like EM force.

Here you have the main Standard Cosmology problem, namely theoretically dividing a fundamental E&M force which is determined to have its basic and principal qualities and laws. Of course, and logically, this basic force cannot be determined to be different forces at all.

The E&M force is ONE FORCE of formation in the plasmatic elementary stages (“cosmic clouds”) and its working via its two polarities, different charges, different frequencies, and different ranges.

The EM force consist of a double helical rotation current and a perpendicularly running magnetic spherical field which provides formation, rotation and orbital motions to anything.

It´s a STRONG E&M ATTRACTIVE POLARITY what assembles cosmic clouds in a swirling motion and bind atom and molecules together to form galaxies, dwarf galaxies stars and planets. It´s this E&M action which "gives masses and weight" to everything and not Newtons occult mental constructs. (The "Higgs Boson" is a Standard Cosmology biased invention made to patch a gravitational idea which never have been explained causally and scientifical by what dynamic means it should work)

With your differentiations here

EM force are not the same as strong nuclear force. Strong nuclear force is so much stronger than EM force, but its range are at atomic and quantum level, not infinite range like EM force.

You´re de facto confirming all the different qualities the EM has everywhere. Just take the EM-force as ONE FORCE.

 

[Native]

NOTE TO THE READERS OF MY POSTS:

IF YOU´LL BE SURE TO GET A QUICKER REPLY TO YOUR POST IN MY OP, YOU´LL HAVE TO GIVE ME A PERSONAL NOTIFICATION FROM MY PROFILE SINCE THE RF-NOTIFICATIONS DOESN´T SEEM TO WORK ON MY POSTINGS.