Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Intelligence regarding what?
When I think of a super genius being president I end up picturing some sort of super villain.
Is this true? I think I can muster a solid 120 in a drunken stupor.Average intelligence is 100.
Probably to try and take over the world.Yeah, when I think of it that way, I agree. (Why else would a super genius want that job?)
Cool, above average even in a stupor. Impressive.Is this true? I think I can muster a solid 120 in a drunken stupor.
I think I'd have to agree with Plato, in that philosophers should be the rulers of a nation.
idav said:Interesting. What do you figure the average intelligence of a philosopher.
I think, personally speaking, that having someone of extraordinary intelligence leading the nation may not be as wise an idea as it might seem. The problem is that the super-brain cannot really relate to those lower down the food chain. If anything, I would want a clever leader, but not a brilliant leader, as the brilliant leader/tactician/what have you may not understand the plight of those he/she is leading at all well - intellectually, perhaps, but in day to day, in the trenches terms - not a chance.Some interesting results. Just to throw this out therefrom some IQ site. The likes of ben franklin was above average by todays standards. High intelligence gives you the likes of Bill Gates.
Not really a knowledge thing but like IQ. Average intelligence is 100.
I think, personally speaking, that having someone of extraordinary intelligence leading the nation may not be as wise an idea as it might seem. The problem is that the super-brain cannot really relate to those lower down the food chain. If anything, I would want a clever leader, but not a brilliant leader, as the brilliant leader/tactician/what have you may not understand the plight of those he/she is leading at all well - intellectually, perhaps, but in day to day, in the trenches terms - not a chance.
I agree. I want my leader to be a smart person, intellectually and academically. But s/he also needs to have a healthy dose of common sense "street smarts", as well as well developed social skills.I think, personally speaking, that having someone of extraordinary intelligence leading the nation may not be as wise an idea as it might seem. The problem is that the super-brain cannot really relate to those lower down the food chain. If anything, I would want a clever leader, but not a brilliant leader, as the brilliant leader/tactician/what have you may not understand the plight of those he/she is leading at all well - intellectually, perhaps, but in day to day, in the trenches terms - not a chance.
Hmm, for an excellent example...picture Sheldon as our leader. What? Wouldn't work well? But...he has an IQ of 187 right?
Okay, I admit it, I'm scattered. Always have been. I may not be the best choice either
I think I'd have to agree with Plato, in that philosophers should be the rulers of a nation.