• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Iran and some Arab nations are "worst online oppressors", says media group.

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) says five Middle Eastern and North African countries are among the world's "worst online oppressors", intimidating and imprisoning journalists and bloggers.
In its report - The ten worst countries to be a blogger - released a few days ahead of a World Press Freedom conference organised by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Social Organisation (Unesco) in Doha, Qatar, CPJ said bloggers were at most risk in Egypt, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and Tunisia.

Burma topped the list for its severe restrictions on internet use and censorship. China was named as the country with the most comprehensive online censorship policies.

Iran was listed as the Middle East's worst offender for its continued harassment and intimidation of bloggers. Omidreza Mirsayafi, an Iran-based blogger, was cited by the CPJ report as having died in prison "under circumstances that have not been fully explained".

Targeting the web

According to an earlier study by the CPJ, 45 per cent of all imprisoned media workers world wide are bloggers, web-based reporters, or online editors.

Of the 125 journalists currently imprisoned around the world, some 56 are web-based journalists and writers. The organisation says 2009 marks the first time the number of jailed online writers surpasses the number of detained print journalists.

Nora Younis, an Egyptian blogger and journalist, explains the trend by saying that "bloggers are nowadays taken seriously by authorities as well as Arab media", a significant change from a few years ago when she said bloggers used to be ignored.

Bloggers in countries like Egypt, Syria, and Tunisia say they have become instrumental in exposing human rights issues like police brutality, torture, and sexual harassment which has made regional governments undertake increasingly aggressive means to curb cyber-dissidence.

Naila Hamdy, a professor of journalism at the American University in Cairo, says that the political and cultural challenges posed by new media have taken Arab governments by surprise.

"So far, unregulated satellite has brought fuelling of sectarian wars, political dissent and opposing views," she told Al Jazeera in a previous interview.

"With the possibility of thousands more stations and other technologies catching on in a second ... I think that those in government responsible for information regulation have realised that they are a decade behind. They are now trying to address this new era."

The voiceless speak


Nevertheless, bloggers in the Middle East are making their voices heard. In Egypt, they took an active part in organising widespread anti-government activities, rallying pro-Hariri protesters in Lebanon, mounting anti-corruption campaigns in Libya and electioneering in Kuwaiti elections.
They have exposed the grim realities of everyday life in war-torn Iraq. In the Gulf, female bloggers are increasingly going online calling for change in a display of growing assertiveness.

More broadly, Arab bloggers continue to break cultural and religious taboos: discussing the social and political malaise afflicting the Arab world, exploring sexual identities and challenging the dominant institutions of religion, state and family.

Ahmed Al Omran, the owner of Saudi Jeans, a Saudi Arabian blog, is one of the most influential in the Gulf region; he hopes to "be a part of the change that is taking place in Saudi Arabia".

Arguing that much of the media in the region does not reflect realities on the ground, he uses his blog as an "agent of change" to push for social justice and greater citizen involvement in the country's affairs.

For him, "human rights, freedom of expression and women's rights are all important issues that our nation will need to tackle on the way to change".

But persecution of cyber-dissidents has became a reality in Saudi Arabia, which has detained bloggers for "violating the kingdom's regulations".

Thirty-two-year-old Fouad al-Farhan was arrested in December 2007 and his computers seized for criticising the pace of reforms in the kingdom.

He was held in solitary confinement at Dahban prison in Jeddah until his release in late April 2008.

Travel bans

But some countries have also in recent years imposed travel bans on bloggers and journalists as a means of applying pressure.

Said Essoulami, the executive director of the Morocco-based Centre for Media Freedom in the Middle East and North Africa, believes the bans are designed to control dissident writers and activists.

"Retaliations such as assassination and imprisonment of writers have been reduced because there are new ways of controlling journalists," he said.

Essoulami said several journalists and bloggers have been barred from participating in international media conferences.

He pointed to the Third Arab Free Press Forum held in Beirut in December 2008 and said many key dissident writers such as Saudi Arabian blogger Fouad Al-Farhan, Mazen Darwish, the director of the Syrian Centre for Media and Freedom of Expression, and Tunisian journalist Litfi Hidouri had been prevented from participating.

"In fact, every journalist invited from Syria could not come," Essoulami said.

Harassment

Bloggers have been detained in many countries -including Bahrain, Egypt, Morocco, Syria, and Saudi Arabia, Tunisia - for the views they expressed on their blogs.
Authorities in these countries are stepping up their efforts to filter such websites. Saudi Arabia blocks thousands of websites and Bahrain is trying to register bloggers, in further signs of a clampdown.

In 2007, Egyptian writer Kareem Amer was imprisoned for "insulting Islam and President Hosni Mubarak" on his blog. He is currently serving a four-year sentence at Borg Al-Arab prison outside Alexandria.

In Syria, blogger Tariq Baissi was sentenced to three years in prison for "weakening the national feeling and the national ethos". Biassi had posted a six word long comment in a web forum in which he criticised the Syrian security services. Numerous other cyber dissidents remain behind bars in Syria.

In Tunis, Nazira Rijba, a Tunisian writer and activist, was in late 2008 charged over an article she wrote in support of the Tunisian news website Kalima which has been subject to censorship by the Tunisian authorities.

She says she is regularly harassed over the Interphone at her house and on the street by the authorities for her work and activism.

"Do not think of us as victims," she said. "We are militants who are being harassed by the government. We are paying the price of freedom, but freedom is the door for change."

Fadi Zaghmout, a Jordanian web developer, uses The Arab Observer blog to write about personal freedoms and tolerance in the Middle East.

His blog sometimes courts controversy because it discusses topics such as sexual freedoms, women's issues, homosexuality and gender equality.

He says he has also been cataloguing underreported cases of sexual harassment of women in the Arab street, honour crimes, and the social pressures on young Arabs - particularly women - to get married.

Increased pressure

Koukha Mansour, a media analyst based in Syria, says journalists and bloggers in the Middle East are likely to continue to face excessive censorship and the fear of being threatened, harassed, or imprisoned in the years to come.

"Middle East media should unify their efforts and establish a liberated journalists union that reinforces the freedom of press and work independently from any governmental or 'lobby' interests," she said.

"Journalists are using bloggers as sources more and more, quoting reports, videos, and photos," Rachid Jankari, a Moroccan journalist, told Al Jazeera.

Many internet activists believe the jailing of web writers will increase in the future, especially as more and more print journalists are said to be migrating to web-based work for various reasons, including censorship circumvention.

"It will increase, I'm sure, as more and more people are tasting the power of the internet and the usage of the web is spreading," said Sami Ben Gharbia, the Tunisia advocacy director of Global Voices, told Al Jazeera.

"We will see more of this detainment of online journalists in the future."

Source: Al Jazeera English - Focus - Middle East web writers 'harassed'
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Very interesting article but I can't say I'm surprised. And the violence toward journalists, bloggers, activist artists - yes, even cartoonists - isn't limited to Middle Eastern countries.

Theo van Gogh lies a-moulderin' in the grave.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
On another thread, we're discussing Malaysia and Islamic laws there, and the issue of moral relativity has come up. I found this interesting site and then did a little more research on it. It ties in nicely to your thread here:

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

Malaysia Today - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Freedom of speech - definitely not a value of Islamic societies. But I guess we don't have any business judging them - how can we impose our value system on theirs? Shame on us!
 

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
On another thread, we're discussing Malaysia and Islamic laws there, and the issue of moral relativity has come up. I found this interesting site and then did a little more research on it. It ties in nicely to your thread here:

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

Malaysia Today - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Freedom of speech - definitely not a value of Islamic societies. But I guess we don't have any business judging them - how can we impose our value system on theirs? Shame on us!

Thanks for the linkage Kathryn. although I do have some sentiments to *some kind* of moral relativism. and that, it is healthy for us to understand the relativism between societies, geographical territories, and cultures not in a way which hinders our own values and ideologies, but simply as a method to give us a broad perspective and a sense of realism. also in the sense that it will help peoplel avoid the what I find dangerous premise of believing we can bring 'democracy' to parts of the world which simply move to a different rhythm.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Oh, I agree - but common sense comes into play somewhere along the way.

I mean, all societal oddities can't be chalked up to "moving to a different rhythm." Seems that moral relativity flies out the window when we're faced with four people holding down an 8 year old girl and carving her clitoris out with no anesthesia, depriving her of normal sexual enjoyment for life, then sewing her up so tightly that her first sexual experience is absolute agony.

But how can we even say that's wrong if we take moral relativism to it's logical conclusion?

I'm not trying to debate this - I struggle with this concept myself. Where do we draw the line? Seems there's a very fine line between freedom and morality.

Personally, I'm morally a libertarian - let others do what they want as long as they don't infringe on the basic human rights of others. But moral relativism doesn't even seem to allow this - because I don't see how moral relativism can even support the concept of basic human rights.
 

Sajdah

Al-Aqsa Is In My Heart.
Nora Younis, an Egyptian blogger and journalist, explains the trend by saying that "bloggers are nowadays taken seriously by authorities as well as Arab media", a significant change from a few years ago when she said bloggers used to be ignored...................

A few days ago, the OP member was praising the Egyptian government for building a steel wall on its border with Gaza Strip......Now the same government is harassing journalists and bloggers, so why don't you praise them here too? Hmmm, because........ I don't really know!!!!!
 

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
Oh, I agree - but common sense comes into play somewhere along the way.

I mean, all societal oddities can't be chalked up to "moving to a different rhythm." Seems that moral relativity flies out the window when we're faced with four people holding down an 8 year old girl and carving her clitoris out with no anesthesia, depriving her of normal sexual enjoyment for life, then sewing her up so tightly that her first sexual experience is absolute agony.

But how can we even say that's wrong if we take moral relativism to it's logical conclusion?

I'm not trying to debate this - I struggle with this concept myself. Where do we draw the line? Seems there's a very fine line between freedom and morality.

Personally, I'm morally a libertarian - let others do what they want as long as they don't infringe on the basic human rights of others. But moral relativism doesn't even seem to allow this - because I don't see how moral relativism can even support the concept of basic human rights.
If we can ease the suffering of others through modern tools, such as constructive use of media and journalism, and international pressure, we should do it. all in the right context.
To me the relativism enters in the sense of coming to terms with the difference between people and societies, and understanding that sometimes we simply cannot change the world so to speak, but we can do other valuable things, and that is to take in information and channel it on, and to understand other societies and cultures. I think a healthy realization is that at the end of the day, a real change may come from within, when a critical mass which may be further inspired by international means pushes final changes and reforms.
we can't take the on world with our modern and distilled urban standards and ideologies, while 80% of Asians and Africans are still focused on agriculture and obviously live a very different reality than all of us on many levels.
 
Last edited:

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
A few days ago, the OP member was praising the Egyptian government for building a steel wall on its border with Gaza Strip......Now the same government is harassing journalists and bloggers, so why don't you praise them here too? Hmmm, because........ I don't really know!!!!!
LOL. I think you need to understand the concept of modern information flow. I am not a disciple of the Egyptian government. I can analyze any middle eastern issue freely as a citizen who lives in the middle east. I can criticize, post and express a variety of opinions on various different topics.
freedom of information and opinion, you should try it sometime.
 

Sajdah

Al-Aqsa Is In My Heart.
LOL. I think you need to understand the concept of modern information flow. I am not a disciple of the Egyptian government. I can analyze any middle eastern issue freely as a citizen who lives in the middle east. I can criticize, post and express a variety of opinions on various different topics.
freedom of information and opinion, you should try it sometime.
Really! I didn't know that you have all these options at the same time!!

If we can ease the suffering of others through modern tools..........

Such as......
Wiki said:
The Foreign Press Association of Israel released a statement saying, “The unprecedented denial of access to Gaza for the world’s media amounts to a severe violation of press freedom and puts the state of Israel in the company of a handful of regimes around the world which regularly keep journalists from doing their jobs.” [322]
Media facilities in Gaza, both foreign and domestic, came under Israeli fire in the military campaign.[323] On one occasion a Grad rocket may have been launched from a location near the television studios in the Al-Shuruk tower in Gaza City. Although the Israeli recording of a reporter describing a missile launch was during the initial aerial bombardment phase the tower was only bombed in the final few days.[324] On December 29, the IDF destroyed the facilities and headquarters of Al-Aqsa TV (though broadcasts continue from elsewhere), and on January 5, the IDF bombed the offices of the Hamas-affiliated Al-Risala newsweekly.[323] On January 9, the IDF hit the Johara tower of Gaza City, which houses more than 20 international news organizations, including Turkish, French, and Iranian outlets.[325]

Gaza War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

McBell

Unbound
LOL. are you sure you want to go that way? the decision by the Israeli security system to prevent journalists from going into a war zone, has nothing to do with the fact that the freedom of press in Israel puts to shame the almost non existent freedom of press in the middle east.

SHHHHH!!!!!

You ain't supposed to know that!
And if you do know that, you sure as hell ain't supposed to say it out loud!!
 

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
Really! I didn't know that you have all these options at the same time!!
In that case it wouldnt hurt to have some self honesty in admitting that the thread about Egypt's decision about its border with the Gaza strip has absolutely NOTHING with this thread about the dystopian reality in the middle east, the only connection is your frustration by the two threads and your inability to connect the two threads with a non existent invisible line.
 

Sajdah

Al-Aqsa Is In My Heart.
LOL. are you sure you want to go that way? the decision by the Israeli security system to prevent journalists from going into a war zone, has nothing to do with the fact that the freedom of press in Israel puts to shame the almost non existent freedom of press in the middle east.

You didn't say how could you ease the sufferings of others....Such as palestinians?! What did your so called government do to help the palestinian Media?!
For instance, why your so called government prevent the palestinian captives from watching Aljazeera?!
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
If we can ease the suffering of others through modern tools, such as constructive use of media and journalism, and international pressure, we should do it. all in the right context.
To me the relativism enters in the sense of coming to terms with the difference between people and societies, and understanding that sometimes we simply cannot change the world so to speak, but we can do other valuable things, and that is to take in information and channel it on, and to understand other societies and cultures. I think a healthy realization is that at the end of the day, a real change may come from within, when a critical mass which may be further inspired by international means pushes final changes and reforms.
we can't take the on world with our modern and distilled urban standards and ideologies, while 80% of Asians and Africans are still focused on agriculture and obviously live a very different reality than all of us on many levels.

I agree with this.

I believe that we should not impose our own personal value system on consenting adults who are not infringing on the rights of others, or who are not asking us to subsidize their lifestyle. That's why I have no problem with(for example) polygamy, marijuana, or a society banning those who do not believe as they do from their midst. People have the right to live according to their own moral standard (or lack thereof) as long as they don't impede the rights of others to do so as well.

Just because I don't choose to live that way doesn't mean they don't have the right to choose that lifestyle or belief system.

My issue though is that if we are ever to help the oppressed, we have to take a stand that opposes those who are oppressing them. Is this judgmental? Is this "imposing our value system on others?"

If we see someone beating his wife within an inch of her life on the street corner in, say, Austin, Texas - do we intervene? Why is that different from seeing someone beating his wife on the street corner in Malaysia (other than, of course, the fact that we're likely to get hauled off to jail for interfering - but that has nothing to with whether or not we SHOULD interfere)? I know we can't change the world, but sometimes we have to step in, even if it means we suffer in the process. Like that old saying goes, "If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything."

There's a difference between voluntarily and involuntarily giving up "rights" also.

Take Singapore for instance. The people have decided that they are going to have a very low tolerance of any sort of misbehavior. If you want to visit or live in Singapore, you better not spit your gum out on the sidewalk - you're likely to get caned. But you're VOLUNTARILY there - and besides that, keep your damn gum in your own mouth.

However, in many societies, the poor, the weak, the young, old, or female are not given the options to choose their lifestyle or belief system.

To me, that's the bottom line - the freedom to protect and relish life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness - without demanding the sacrifice of rights from others.
 

Sajdah

Al-Aqsa Is In My Heart.
In that case it wouldnt hurt to have some self honesty in admitting that the thread about Egypt's decision about its border with the Gaza strip has absolutely NOTHING with this thread about the dystopian reality in the middle east.

Unfortunately it has.........

the Egyptian daily al-Shorouk said that Facebook has closed the site of the biggest Egyptian group opposing the Egyptian steel wall with Gaza. The newspaper reports that Facebook closed the site after coming under pressure from official Egyptian and Israeli parties...
Arabiadeserta.com
 

Tiapan

Grumpy Old Man
The first sign of neo-nazism is the suppression of free speech. Next comes the burning of the books (computers these days), then follows the oppression. Is there a difference between the "Religious" police of these nations and Nazi Germany's "Thought" Police the Gestapo?

Cheers
 
Last edited:

Sajdah

Al-Aqsa Is In My Heart.
bad weather in Cairo today? forget the forecast, read the new conspiracy digest of the 'Zionist entity'.
So don't forget it the next time. :rolleyes:

Back to my invisible question....

You didn't say how could you ease the sufferings of others....Such as palestinians?!

If we can ease the suffering of others through modern tools, such as constructive use of media and journalism, and international pressure, we should do it. all in the right context.

I really hate that disgusting hypocrisy, when some people talk as if they are the saviours of the world, give others lessons and lectures in freedom, but practically their governments is spreading mischief and corruption in the world, and using their power to oppress others, but of course they claim that they are just "liberating" them.
The international pressure you are talking about is used just to enforce the Agendas of the U.S and its allies, to achieve their interests which are not the same interests of those oppressed people.
 

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
Iran and some Arab nations are "worst online oppressors", says media group.

I think I saw something about this on Well, Duh! News.
 

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
The international pressure you are talking about is used just to enforce the Agendas of the U.S and its allies, to achieve their interests which are not the same interests of those oppressed people.
Which international pressure? if you mean my conversation with Kathryn, it has nothing to do with the thread at hand, it is about 'cultural relativism'.
 
Top