• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Irony of the evolutionary belief

I have made no such admissions, since there is no admission to make on my part regarding acceptance of the pseudoscience you seem to support with empty opinion. However, I predict what you are doing is all that you will do here.

I don't believe you understand science and I don't believe you support it.

You have offered nothing except personal opinion without basis.
All of that is your own private opinion, it's not supported by and evidence of facts. I don't even recognize your version of science as having any credibility to begin with.
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
But neither side had any evidence to support their claims, it was nothing more than two opposing world views clashing. Both walked away holding on to their view as being the truth while rubbishing the opponent.

The challenge was domed from the start, as the opponents didn't accept each others evidence as valid as the nature of the subject requires faith to validate either side. So nobody was willing to place any faith in the opponents view.
The claim that ID was religion dressed up as science by "cdesign Proponentsists" and not science and hence inappropriate to a science curriculum was amply demonstrated as you can read in the judges ruling.
 
Top