• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is Brahman same as Buddhist void(sunyata)

psychoslice

Veteran Member
Because those are the accepted understandings in the relevant traditions. Unless you want to re-invent all the world's religions?
So you believe in second hand knowledge, and why not re-invent religion, religion on its own hasn't given anything worth while.
 

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
It is quite rude that some Hindus wish to misinterpret and force their misconceptions of Buddhism onto Buddhists in an effort to assimilate them under Hinduism, whereas Buddhists have long maintained their own separate identity, beliefs and practices..

Quite frankly it's rude of anyone to force their misconceptions of Buddhism onto Buddhists, but unfortunately it happens on a regular basis. New-agers and woolly syncretists do it on a regular basis. Hindus do it occasionally too, but they really should know better.
 

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
So you believe in second hand knowledge, and why not re-invent religion, religion on its own hasn't given anything worth while.

That's a different discussion. In any case sunyata is incompatible with Brahman or any absolute.

Sunyata is conditionality and relativity, therefore it is incompatible with any absolute.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
Yes of course it is, just like any discussion, there is never a right or wrong, there is just a discussion.

Maybe you should start another thread.

If you think that sunyata and Brahman are the same can you explain why you think that? What is it about these two things that makes them the same? What characteristics?
 

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
Yes but again that just second hand knowledge.

Actually it's a pointer, or a hypothesis. One has to investigate experience closely to see if it's valid. Can you find anything permanent and independent in your experience, or is it all transient and conditional?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
That's it you have it, its nothing more than a stupid concept, and nothing else.

They're all concepts. What we're doing here is being clear about the differences between them.

It's like saying that words are all just words. Or course, but words do have different meanings. Or do you want to pretend that apples are the same as oranges?
 

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
Its good that you are questioning Hinduism, because no ideology is ever completely true, no matter who.

It's fine to question, but if you don't have a proper understanding of what you're questioning then it's rather pointless.

Sunyata is misunderstood by many people, they simply don't get it. Other people begin to understand it and then back away because it scares the hell out of them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ekanta

om sai ram
In Buddhism the unconditioned refers to the liberated state of mind. It is not a thing or a place, and it is definitely not Brahman or God.
Your answer is self defeating. Unborn means eternal. The unborn existed before the phenomena came and passed. The unborn existed before the temporary "state of mind" you refer to as liberation (lol).
Your whole world of ideas are just within the realm of fantasies.
 
Top