Rick O'Shez
Irishman bouncing off walls
How do you know that ?.
Because those are the accepted understandings in the relevant traditions. Unless you want to re-invent all the world's religions?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How do you know that ?.
So you believe in second hand knowledge, and why not re-invent religion, religion on its own hasn't given anything worth while.Because those are the accepted understandings in the relevant traditions. Unless you want to re-invent all the world's religions?
It is quite rude that some Hindus wish to misinterpret and force their misconceptions of Buddhism onto Buddhists in an effort to assimilate them under Hinduism, whereas Buddhists have long maintained their own separate identity, beliefs and practices..
So you believe in second hand knowledge, and why not re-invent religion, religion on its own hasn't given anything worth while.
Why cannot Buddha handle that, is he useless ?.Quite frankly it's rude of anyone to force their misconceptions of Buddhism onto Buddhists, but unfortunately it happens on a regular basis. New-agers and woolly syncretists do it on a regular basis.
How do you know that ?.That's a different discussion. In any case sunyata is incompatible with Brahman or any absolute.
How do you know that ?.
Yes but that's all second hand knowledge, why would you believe that ?.Read the thread.
Also read the Heart Sutra which explains sunyata ( emptiness ), see if you can find any references to Brahman or God.
http://plumvillage.org/news/thich-nhat-hanh-new-heart-sutra-translation/
Yes but that's all second hand knowledge, why would you believe that ?.
Yes of course it is, just like any discussion, there is never a right or wrong, there is just a discussion.That's yet another discussion, also off topic.
Yes of course it is, just like any discussion, there is never a right or wrong, there is just a discussion.
....buddhisn itself is a refutation of many foundational philosophical concepts of hinduism.
Both hinayana and mahayana clearly says there is a permanent unborn.
Well that's what happened isn't it ?.That's yet another discussion, also off topic.
Yes but again that just second hand knowledge.Read the thread.
Also read the Heart Sutra which explains sunyata ( emptiness ), see if you can find any references to Brahman or God.
http://plumvillage.org/news/thich-nhat-hanh-new-heart-sutra-translation/
That's it you have it, its nothing more than a stupid concept, and nothing else.In Buddhism the unconditioned refers to the liberated state of mind. It is not a thing or a place, and it is definitely not Brahman or God.
Yes but again that just second hand knowledge.
That's it you have it, its nothing more than a stupid concept, and nothing else.
Its good that you are questioning Hinduism, because no ideology is ever completely true, no matter who.
Your answer is self defeating. Unborn means eternal. The unborn existed before the phenomena came and passed. The unborn existed before the temporary "state of mind" you refer to as liberation (lol).In Buddhism the unconditioned refers to the liberated state of mind. It is not a thing or a place, and it is definitely not Brahman or God.