doppelganger
Through the Looking Glass
Not all of it is earmarked for those ridiculous programs.The bad thing is that the money is earmarked for "abstinence-only" sex ed,
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Not all of it is earmarked for those ridiculous programs.The bad thing is that the money is earmarked for "abstinence-only" sex ed,
That sounds just about right. 3 out of 10 have made a killing in the last 8 years.
True, but any percentage is too much. Any percentage given to something that doesn't work to stem the spread of HIV is money taken away from something that does work.doppelgänger;1147432 said:Not all of it is earmarked for those ridiculous programs.
Maybe she's talking about Pat Buchanan. He's been lambasting Bush so he must be a liberal, right?
Unfortunately, there are people who prefer money to integrity, and the illusion of security to freedom.
Of course it is, to a point. But I didn't say people were giving up freedom for money.Having money is freedom Bill.
No. But in the majority of cases, a wealthy man is either a thief or the son of a thief.Are you saying one must be poor to have integrity?
No. But in the majority of cases, a wealthy man is either a thief or the son of a thief.