Desert Snake
Veteran Member
Noticed that deists tend to have what are considered "theistic"ideas
The concepts are the same, yet the wording is different.
Thoughts?
The concepts are the same, yet the wording is different.
Thoughts?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Deism is a subcategory of Theism.Noticed that deists tend to have what are considered "theistic"ideas
The concepts are the same, yet the wording is different.
Thoughts?
And yet you wrote this drivel in the thread.I'll go with
WHO CARES?
because I don't care. Next.
And yet you wrote this drivel in the thread.
Way to be respectful. Sad.I'll go with
WHO CARES?
because I don't care. Next.
To me deism is not a type of theism. It's more a nontheist thing. But I do often hear deists say that they believe things that sound theistic to me. So, to me, the answer is no. But to other people who identify as deist the answer might be yes, or maybe.Noticed that deists tend to have what are considered "theistic"ideas
The concepts are the same, yet the wording is different.
Thoughts?
I consider myself a (pan)theist and I'm nearly as agnostic as you when it comes to the details. So I would count also your version a form of theism.To me deism is not a type of theism. It's more a nontheist thing. But I do often hear deists say that they believe things that sound theistic to me. So, to me, the answer is no. But to other people who identify as deist the answer might be yes, or maybe.
It seems to me that the Universe, Creation if you will, does exist. Whatever the reason for that I call god. The difference between me and theists is that I don't think that I know anything important about the reason, God. I don't know whether god cares about anything, much less what it is. I think science is the best way to learn about god.
But I also have other ideas that I like and "believe", I just don't think I know and remain confident that I am wrong about them. Just like everyone else is. The difference between me and a theist is that I know humans well enough to be skeptical of beliefs that aren't based on anything more credible than what theist's beliefs are.
Tom
I don't think theism, at it's essence, is necessarily about deity. It's the beliefs that one holds to be objectively true, about the supernatural, because one prefers to live in a world where the beliefs are true. The beliefs are held out of preference, rather than preponderance of evidence.The concept of deity is inherently too arbitrary for an objective answer to the OP's question to be possible.
I think it's theism.Noticed that deists tend to have what are considered "theistic"ideas
The concepts are the same, yet the wording is different.
Thoughts?
Others may disagree, but that isn't what I mean by it.I think it's theism.
Deism if I'm correct, is a God that created something and then left the building.
I don't think theism, at it's essence, is necessarily about deity. It's the beliefs that one holds to be objectively true, about the supernatural, because one prefers to live in a world where the beliefs are true. The beliefs are held out of preference, rather than preponderance of evidence.
So Buddhism is theistic, despite the lack of a God image.
Deism is not, despite having one. Because Buddhism teaches about the afterlife, reincarnation, which is a belief about the supernatural.
Deism doesn't have any supernaturalism.
At least, I don't. Maybe I am not a deist. It wouldn't bother me if I failed (again) to fit some label or another.
Tom