Bathos Logos
Active Member
I would reserve the use of the word "evil" for those things that are malicious or purposefully detrimental to humans with both forethought and intent. So, things like "parasites" would not qualify as "evil" - because their intent is only to find a cozy place to survive as they are able, and what they are doing is most certainly not "evil" from their perspective, if they could contemplate such things. Things like tsunamis or earthquakes would not qualify either, because there is neither forethought nor intent.Is Evolution the cause of all evils that we are witnessing in the world?
As for the case of evolution being the cause of some evil in the world, I can't completely discount this possibility, however I can tell from the tone of your OP that you aren't going to like the reason I might accept it. Humans are one of the only things on Earth that can perpetrate "evil" if you take into account forethought and intent. And therefore, evolution could very well be at the root of some of the "evil" that human beings perpetrate on one another specifically because we are a product of evolution. And so, any predispositions or instincts we have that might see us committing what we collectively deem "evil" if we let those impulses rule unchecked could have "evolution" as the reason those things exist in our psychology/psyche/makeup.
And even though this command would supposedly exist if we accepted a particular God as this "creator" who is said to have made such a command, what do we see? There still exists what we'd call "evil", right? So, if evolution is completely false (for the sake of argument), then where is this "evil" coming from? If you don't believe in evolution at all, then you literally cannot blame any evil committed on it! That wouldn't make any sense. It would be like me, an atheist, blaming God for the fact that my car didn't start this morning! I don't believe in God... so how can I attribute Him with blame for anything?!Creation and Intelligent Design accept that an Intelligent Agent or Intelligent Designer (IDer) exist who had commanded us to love each other. Love means to let other people live happily, even though you may sacrifice. John 3:16
This most certainly does not follow. Even if Intelligent Design is correct, these things "hate" and "anger" still exist. And you just stating that "without Intelligent Design there is no such thing as love" doesn't make that true by any stretch of the imagination. That is just a claim stated with zero supporting evidence. If evolution is the true means by which all the life on Earth diversified, then why does that make "hate" and "anger" the norm? You haven't provided any supporting evidence for this notion either. And so, currently, you have just said some stuff - and not very intelligent stuff, I feel compelled to add.But if Evolution is correct, therefore, IDer does not exist, so is love. Then hate and anger would be the norm.
How can you get rid of it if it is the true method by which the life on Earth has diversified from whatever beginnings it had? I feel it pertinent to inform you that there is a whopping crapload more evidence for evolution than there is for all of these various species of flora and fauna having been crafted by some "creator". There is just no comparison to be made between the amount and forms of evidence, honestly. Intelligent Design has as its evidence some of the crappiest articles ever having been presented as support for anything. In fact, most of what I have seen is nothing more than attempts to discredit evolution - which is not, by any stretch of the imagination, evidence for Intelligent Design. A lot of theists who support ID don't tend to understand this distinction - or, if they do, they pretend to be ignorant of it and just keep spouting nonsense against evolution anyway. At least in my experience.Thus, let us get rid of Evolution, as one sources of evil.
Last edited: