15 Whoppers Beck Did Not Get Fired For In 2010 | Media Matters for America
Is Glenn Beck a liar, pathological or otherwise?
Is Glenn Beck a liar, pathological or otherwise?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
15 Whoppers Beck Did Not Get Fired For In 2010 | Media Matters for America
Is Glenn Beck a liar, pathological or otherwise?
I've actually never listened to Glenn Beck or Bill O Riley, but Sean Hannity used to be on when I was driving home from work and I just couldn't stomach him at all. I figured Glenn Beck would be pretty much the same, so I just didn't see the point.Glenn Beck is just as deranged as Bill O Riley or Sean Hannity.
Glenn Beck is just as deranged as Bill O Riley or Sean Hannity.
15 Whoppers Beck Did Not Get Fired For In 2010 | Media Matters for America
Is Glenn Beck a liar, pathological or otherwise?
Now, now....I must chime in to defend us extremists. I am an extremist. On the Political Compass, noSeriously, I think the same thing is true with Beck as with any other extremist. If you hate someone or something as bad as he hates....
I wouldn't say Glenn Beck is a liar, more a victim...a victim of his own fame.
I also have a sort of respect for Hannity. O'Reilly is a clown, Beck is a moron, Gretta seems nothing more than someone to walk all over, and cousin Limbaugh is just evil. But you can tell Hannity does actually believe in what he says, he isn't making an *** out of himself with the same mockery and ridicule tactics the others utilize, and he wants to get his message out. I do not agree with him on anything, but at least for awhile he was working with someone who didn't have an ultra-right bias.I think--and I don't want to speak for anyone else here--that of those Big Three at Fox "News," Sean Hannity is the only one who genuinely cares about influencing people for the better. He's extremely misguided, ill-informed, and close-minded, but I think he doesn't let opposing views in because he truly believes they are bad. If he could change the latter, and that alone, he's the only one of the three that I could respect. Some of you will strongly disagree with this, and that's fine. There's always a chance that, as I have done many times with other issues over the last several years, I find new information that causes me to change this conclusion.