YeshuaRedeemed
Revelation 3:10
I say yes. People need healthcare to live, and as a prolifer, I believe people have the right to live. Some background: I am a moderate, not a liberal. I just happen to believe healthcare is a right.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Thank you, I agree. I wonder why more prolifers don't agree.You will probably start an argument about what the word "right" means in this context.
But I agree with you. Here in first world countries there is no moral excuse for people to do without basic healthcare. Tom
I say yes. People need healthcare to live, and as a prolifer, I believe people have the right to live. Some background: I am a moderate, not a liberal. I just happen to believe healthcare is a right.
That's one reason why I don't agree with the very phrase "pro life" because, unlike the Catholic Church, most drop the issue once a child is born. It is to me a fundamental inconsistency in the position.Thank you, I agree. I wonder why more prolifers don't agree.
Good point. It is true of a lot of far right people.That's one reason why I don't agree with the very phrase "pro life" because, unlike the Catholic Church, most drop the issue once a child is born. It is to me a fundamental inconsistency in the position.
To me it's not a commodity like others for one very simple reason. If I'm injured and unconscious I'll be taken to a hospital and treated no matter what. I can choose to buy a refrigerator or car, I have no choice if I'm unconscious. I have no ability at that time to shop for the best service at the best price especially since what treatment I might need might be better at one hospital than another.Not a right as healthcare is a commodity and linked with other commodity markets. This does not mean a government can not take upon itself the responsibility for providing it as a duty of government.
Because there are very few ProLifers.Thank you, I agree. I wonder why more prolifers don't agree.
Why divide the Human Family up by national borders?I think if a country is rich enough to afford universal health care, it should implement universal health care.
I say yes. People need healthcare to live, and as a prolifer, I believe people have the right to live. Some background: I am a moderate, not a liberal. I just happen to believe healthcare is a right.
Why divide the Human Family up by national borders?
Does being born the USA make one more entitled to basic healthcare than being born in Thailand or Haiti?
I am really kinda difficult on ProLife issues. I see this as a huge one, second only to environmental degradation.
Tom
To me it's not a commodity like others for one very simple reason. If I'm injured and unconscious I'll be taken to a hospital and treated no matter what. I can choose to buy a refrigerator or car, I have no choice if I'm unconscious.
I have no ability at that time to shop for the best service at the best price especially since what treatment I might need might be better at one hospital than another.
But I do agree there should be competition to provide the best service at the lowest price.
I agree. It's a huge logistical problem. One totally beyond the primitive ethics of most religions.Not everyone wants democracy or accept the laws of one specific nation and there is no world government as of yet. There has to be enforcement of standards and resource distribution.
I agree. It's a huge logistical problem. One totally beyond the primitive ethics of most religions.
But suppose well equipped and staffed health clinics were as pervasive as McDonald's restaurants?
C'mon, we put a man on the moon and created internet.
We can do This!
Tom