spiritualhitchhiker
neti, neti, neti
Attraction, identity and sex are completely different issues. One cannot be "substituted" for another.
Please elaborate on the bolded parts.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Attraction, identity and sex are completely different issues. One cannot be "substituted" for another.
I wouldn't say a miracle is simply "an unexplained event". A miracle is more accurately defined as an occurrence for which the only reasonable explanation can be some form of divine intervention.
If miracles are unexplained events and they are then explained wouldn't they cease to be miracles?
Anything God does necessarily involves magical interference with the natural progress of things. If He doesn't alter physics or chemistry to achieve a particular end He's just standing back and watching; he's irrelevant from a practical standpoint, He's extraneous. There is, in fact, no evidence of Him.
The Abrahamic concept of God is of a magical (miraculous) being.
In many churches, the voice of God is a subliminal whisper, projected by a subliminal encoder (below). They are actually communicating with parishioners in silent voice while everyone is listening to the sermon or praying. The ultra-mini speakers are so small, you'd never find them. If you're a very important parishioner, they even find a way to talk to you at home, even when you're having sex!!!!
Just in case a parishioner suspects something fishy is going on, there is even a philosophy of Godly whispering!
Do you think anyone can explain what LIFE is other than the Creator of it? Yet, we have millions of scientists trying to give us explanations of LIFE. Most people don't see LIFE as a miracle.
So I don't need the bible or any other text? That knowledge will simply come to me?Miracles can't be explained by men but if you listen to the Voice of the Lord, He will explain how He created everything. Then miracles are easy to understand.
Scientists still argue if a virus is a form of life. Most of them say it is not, but i wonder what should it be otherwise?Where did the strands of proteins come from?
So I don't need the bible or any other text? That knowledge will simply come to me?
Where did the strands of proteins come from?
How could something that doesn't even exist have a DNA?If you are in a church with a subliminal projection system, all you have to do is whisper a prayer and someone at the controls will reply with your answer that they want you to have. It will seem as though it were your own idea too!
From evolution. The universe has DNA made of energy elements. Living things have actual DNA that is manifestation of the divine DNA. Taoism follows a panentheistic model of the universe and divinity. The cosmic mother did not come from anything because it is outside the existential universe - just like a pregnant mother is not baby. God exists (because the theologians say so) but Tao does not.
Scientists still argue if a virus is a form of life. Most of them say it is not, but i wonder what should it be otherwise?
What does that mean?Our Creator is the best simulation programmer that exists in our universe. He can make anything possible.
How could something that doesn't even exist have a DNA?
Our Creator is the best simulation programmer that exists in our universe. He can make anything possible.
What does that mean?
In what way would this constitute deoxyribonucleic acid?
Why couldn't we just live in a Brownian universe? Thats so complicated!The cosmic mother has at least one scientific analog: a quantum vacuum. It does not "exist" in our space-time continuum. A quantum vacuum is totally empty, but mathematically, spurts of energy just appear out of nowhere. When the energies coagulate or consolidate, they begin to evolve. There is a physicist at Stanford University, Leonard Susskind, who has a model of the universe containing its own DNA from elements of the String cosmos. (Susskind, Leonard, “Darwin’s Legacy”, Physics World, July 2009, Vol. 22, p. 7.) This evolution of the energies into the universe is detailed scripturally in the Lieh Tzu ch. 1.
Here's a quote from Susskind's article:
"Let us begin with the DNA of a universe. What is it and why do we believe such a thing makes sense? ... If we could look at the universe through a super-powerful microscope, we would see that it is composed of “Tinkertoy” elements called fluxes, branes, moduli, orientifolds (and more) all arranged on a tiny knot of higher-dimensional space called a Calabi–Yau manifold. The Calabi–Yau manifold is like the basic spine of the DNA molecule, and the other elements can be arranged and rearranged in a huge variety of ways; perhaps as many ways as a real DNA molecule."
Doesn't make it a complex of sugars, phosphates and nitrogenous bases.