Well is it? Why or why not?
Do you use it for delivery orders?
Do you use it for delivery orders?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't use Amazon, partly because of the unethical treatment of employees at Amazon but I wouldn't make that into a categorical imperative.Well is it? Why or why not?
Do you use it for delivery orders?
No, it really isn't. But there is no ethical consumption under Capitalism.
I don't use it because it's usually ridiculously expensive.
They want $30 for the exact same brand and size of wild rice I get at the supermarket for $5
I incorporate use of it about as much as with other order companies and brick and mortar stores. It depends on what I want, availability and how quickly I need it.Well is it? Why or why not?
Do you use it for delivery orders?
Now that you mention it, though, you have me thinking.
Yes!Three cheers for thinking!
Capitalism thrives and relies on exploitation of the working class. It doesn't matter the company, someone is getting abused. For anything to get better, Capitalism has to be reigned in with restrictions and regulations.That's a big claim. What makes you say that?
Maybe there is a grain of truth to this, but I don't know what kind of rice you are talking about.I don't use it because it's usually ridiculously expensive.
They want $30 for the exact same brand and size of wild rice I get at the supermarket for $5
Capitalism thrives and relies on exploitation of the working class. It doesn't matter the company, someone is getting abused. For anything to get better, Capitalism has to be reigned in with restrictions and regulations.
No, I do not use it. To many reasons to list the reason why.
If that what you are selling was produced using exploitation ...If I sell something to you as one private citizen to another, and we both agree on the price and both are happy with the deal, is that exploitation?
Maybe there is a grain of truth to this, but I don't know what kind of rice you are talking about.
If that what you are selling was produced using exploitation ...
I said "if", I don't claim that all production is exploitative. The production (or more precisely distribution) at Amazon is exploitative. When you force your children to produce what you are selling as a private citizen, it is exploitative.Was it? Is there no circumstance in which a product can be produced non-exploitatively unless the state owns the means of production?
That was pretty easy to winnow out wasn't it.I see what you did there.