Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Avatar of whom?
Yeshua might be Shiva, they're both known as the lord of the dance, both eternally youthful, both bring salvation and destruction, etc.
There is no canonical Hindu scripture that mentions him as an avatar of God.
Kalki and the rider in Revelations both come on a white horse, to bring the dawn of Satya Yuga/Messianic age.
Depends how you view them, there has been Lila since the beginning of time, it is just our perception of it that might be off.The "prophecies" are a modern invention.
It was to show context of the question being asked, based on the text overall; personally accept all of it, and don't differentiate it being separate, and thought that would still be Hindu?How we are concerned if Yeshua of whatever was an avatara of your God or not?
Depends how you view them, there has been Lila since the beginning of time, it is just our perception of it that might be off.
It was to show context of the question being asked, based on the text overall; personally accept all of it, and don't differentiate it being separate, and thought that would still be Hindu?
Wasn't asserting, just questioning if the concepts could interlink contextually.
I quite understand your point and appreciate it, but see, there are various levels of truth. At the mundane level there are differences and it is not practical to disregard the differences. Of course, at the highest level, things are different and there are no differences at all. You must have seen us discussing the 'Vyavaharika Satya' (Pragmatic truth) and 'Parmarthika Satya' (Truth at the highest level).It was to show context of the question being asked, based on the text overall; personally accept all of it, and don't differentiate it being separate, and thought that would still be Hindu?
Not to mention that the pronunciations are completely different.
Goddess: Kālī (Kaa-lee). Long a, long i.
"Demon": Kali (Kuh-lih; meh, it's close). Short a, short i.
Pronunciation is everything. Mālā = prayer beads, mala = "biological waste", dirt.
You're not getting what i was saying if you think that.... I was trying to show the different metaphors, how they exist within their own contexts, and how then they might be cross referenced.
o assume that Kali Yuga, and the story of Kali killing Raktavija, with Shiva is coincidental, when nothing happens by chance, shows how you've misunderstood the Lila.
I'd not cross reference the two ideas, as there isn't justification to do so; yet within the Lela of the Bible, the Mother of all Harlots is to catch out the workers of iniquity, who drink the blood of the saints.
And Kali drinks the blood of the demons to eliminate them, so it is a possibility that Kali is the Mother of All Harlots.
Those following the Mother of All Harlots aren't our enemy, they're just confused souls who've been misled.