• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is nihilism true and if so why ?

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
Existential Nihilism.
The notion that existence has no objective meaning or purpose?

This may or may not be the case - human knowledge is fundamentally non-objective so whether or not there is an objective meaning or purpose is not possible to determine or know. Absence of human ability to know does not equate to absence in reality, but in practical terms it might as well. In any case, humans are the storytelling animal and is routine for all humans to derive subjective meaning or purpose based on their experiences.
 

ajay0

Well-Known Member
I feel like nihilism is true but I don't want it to be.

I would say Nihilism is a false philosophy that came in the background of ignorance of the phenomenon of enlightenment, which has been emphasized in Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sufism.

Nihilism claims that all virtues and values are abstract contrivances without any relevance of their own. This philosophy has been deludedly used by the nazis and serial criminals to justify their excesses.

On the other hand eastern philosophy states that virtues and values are equivalent to meditation itself, enabling the raising of consciousness leading to enlightenment.

Rajini Menon is a modern enlightened sage who attained enlightenment by adhering to virtuous conduct and her conscience without any Gurus or spiritual exercises. I had created a thread over here in this regard..


Swami Satchidananda had equated virtuous conduct with meditation itself and Buddha had stated that virtue can progressively lead to the highest.

 

Massimo2002

Active Member
I would say Nihilism is a false philosophy that came in the background of ignorance of the phenomenon of enlightenment, which has been emphasized in Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sufism.

Nihilism claims that all virtues and values are abstract contrivances without any relevance of their own. This philosophy has been deludedly used by the nazis and serial criminals to justify their excesses.

On the other hand eastern philosophy states that virtues and values are equivalent to meditation itself, enabling the raising of consciousness leading to enlightenment.

Rajini Menon is a modern enlightened sage who attained enlightenment by adhering to virtuous conduct and her conscience without any Gurus or spiritual exercises. I had created a thread over here in this regard..


Swami Satchidananda had equated virtuous conduct with meditation itself and Buddha had stated that virtue can progressively lead to the highest.

So Nihilism does not originate from Buddhism or Hinduism ?
 

ajay0

Well-Known Member
So Nihilism does not originate from Buddhism or Hinduism ?

Nope. If nihilism originated from them , they would not be emphasizing virtuous conduct and conscience adherence, and probably would be emphasizing materialism and hedonism at all costs instead.

I had created a similar thread on the subject in the philosophy forum as well...

 

Heyo

Veteran Member
You deny human rights? Is for example "raping is bad" only a subjective position?
Yes. It is very widely agreed upon, but it's still only a construct. And a very modern one at that. We only have recently agreed that it's bad between spouses, and there are still people who don't agree.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
Yes. It is very widely agreed upon, but it's still only a construct. And a very modern one at that. We only have recently agreed that it's bad between spouses, and there are still people who don't agree.
Addendum: and then there are those people who think it isn't really that bad. At least not bad enough to not vote for rapists. You may get an Attorney General who is a rapist (though he evaded conviction until now).
 

PearlSeeker

Well-Known Member
Yes. It is very widely agreed upon, but it's still only a construct. And a very modern one at that. We only have recently agreed that it's bad between spouses, and there are still people who don't agree.

Human rights stem from the old notion of cosmic order - Rta, Logos, Dao... It doesn't matter if people have only recently agreed on something. It's bad now and it was bad before.
 
Top