paarsurrey
Veteran Member
One of our friends here gave an opinion that Richard Dawkins is not a scientist.
What is your opinion? Please
What is your opinion? Please
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
One of our friends here gave an opinion that Richard Dawkins is not a scientist.
What is your opinion? Please
Great scientist but a rotten human being
One of our friends here gave an opinion that Richard Dawkins is not a scientist.
What is your opinion? Please
I gotta agree.You are POE
thats my opinion.
Great scientist but a rotten human being
this sentence makes no sense as written.Hes a good evolution explainer but not a scientist or knows anything from religion he rather criticise something he doesn't know and then when he is in a debate he confirms the religion a real fake..
Hes a good evolution explainer but not a scientist or knows anything from religion he rather criticise something he doesn't know and then when he is in a debate he confirms the religion a real fake..
One of our friends here gave an opinion that Richard Dawkins is not a scientist.
What is your opinion? Please
Hes a good evolution explainer but not a scientist or knows anything from religion he rather criticise something he doesn't know and then when he is in a debate he confirms the religion a real fake..
Great scientist but a rotten human being
Great scientist but a rotten human being
It depends on the focus of the curriculum and the thesis. If it's primarily comparative studies, historical, or paper research intensive then a MA would be likely awarded. If it's more hands-on studies then it will probably be an MS. In the US, neither degree is superior to the other.Why an Ethologist is awarded a degree of MA instead of MSc or MS? Any good reason, please.