Is the Biblical IQ Test Too Advanced for Most People?

[allright]

The first 3 gospels are Jesus presenting himself as the Messiah under the law and being rejected by the the Jewish people.
The Gospel of John covers the last 3 weeks of Jesus life and
is him presenting the new covenant since he had been rejected
and was going to have to die and resurrect bringing in the new covenant and making the previous one void
Of course they are very different, there two different covenants
Paul's is in total agreement with the new covenant

 

[wizanda]

The first 3 gospels are Jesus presenting himself as the Messiah under the law and being rejected by the the Jewish people.

Yeshua didn't present himself as Messiah, he told his disciples not to tell anyone, and that it was a future event.

Yeshua wasn't rejected by the Jewish people thousands came to hear him on the Sermon on the Mount, and thousands were following after.. It was the Sanhedrin, and the religious leaders who rejected him.

The Gospel of John covers the last 3 weeks of Jesus life and is him presenting the new covenant

The New Covenant isn't you get salvation from jesus's death as John implies; instead it is that the people have been cut off for turning animal into human sacrifice (Ezekiel 4-5).

Paul's is in total agreement with the new covenant

This is working backwards; if you read the Tanakh first, it is clear why we were cut off, and Paul making up that we're still a chosen vessel set apart, is because he doesn't understand the prophets, and Law.

In my opinion.

 

[allright]

Yeshua didn't present himself as Messiah, he told his disciples not to tell anyone, and that it was a future event.

Yeshua wasn't rejected by the Jewish people thousands came to hear him on the Sermon on the Mount, and thousands were following after.. It was the Sanhedrin, and the religious leaders who rejected him.

The New Covenant isn't you get salvation from jesus's death as John implies; instead it is that the people have been cut off for turning animal into human sacrifice (Ezekiel 4-5).

This is working backwards; if you read the Tanakh first, it is clear why we were cut off, and Paul making up that we're still a chosen vessel set apart, is because he doesn't understand the prophets, and Law.

In my opinion.

total nonsense

 

[Akivah]

Like find this so frustrating relaying things about the Bible with people, who've not got the requirement in comprehension to notice the basics first.

Such as many Buddhist, Hindus, Atheists, Christians, Jews, Muslims, etc...
{snip}

Now how to proceed is my question, surely there must be a way to educate the world; rather than just burn everyone in a Lake of Fire for being so thick, they've not noticed any of this stuff on their own.

So you've got a quiz that you made up which enables you to call anyone to provide answers that only you've come up with, ignorant (i.e. thick). Quite a tool you've got there or maybe you just are one.

In my opinion.

 

[Kenny]

Composed AFTER the letters of Paul, Mark and Matthew were INTENDED as symbolic fiction, being written in a symbolic chiastic structure.

Only with Luke-Acts did Christians start to view the four Gospels literally.

That is a modern day interpretation. Early church doesn't agree with that position as well as most of 21st century Church

 

[wizanda]

So you've got a quiz that you made up which enables you to call anyone to provide answers

There are numerous statements within the Tanakh that speak of it being a riddle, a sealed book, a test, a conspiracy, and a snare that shall come, which it did, and still people don't get it; so find that clearly obvious it goes over people's heads, yet it isn't my test, it is YHVH's.

This is about a Hebraic religious texts that exists, that can be objectively examined by anyone to see the prophesied Hellenistic contradictions that took place after.

In my opinion.

 

[Akivah]

it isn't my test, it is YHVH's.

Wow! Please post a sample of YHVH's handwriting.

 

[wizanda]

Wow! Please post a sample of YHVH's handwriting.

The handwriting of God is the reality we live in.

Tho within the Case given to us, the revision papers are the Tanakh; the IQ morality test is the Synoptic Gospels Vs John, Paul, and Simon the stone (petros).

Literally only something divine, could have made something so succinct; in terms of fulfilling all prophetic ideals at the same time.

In my opinion.

 

[SomeRandom]

Thank you for the review, can understand that perspective, if someone is taking me as an avatar trying to help people understand; the reply above is saying the same thing, and I'm just being honest trying to share knowledge to help.

In my opinion.

Okay. But if you're unable to truly connect with your audience as an avatar, then you have failed as an avatar. That's just how it is.
Your job is to unite, but you cannot unite if you have a chip on your shoulder and this amount of hubris. Krishna won people over with his personality, his simplicity and his lack of any real need to lecture anyone. Because he felt secure in his mission. (Not saying you don't, but Krishna pulls that look off.)
Jesus had charisma, I'm assuming and appealed to people.
The Buddha seemed at least likeable and wore his beliefs proudly but without being snobby about it.
Baba of Shiridi appealed to people because he was able to teach people from their own books without looking like a hubris filled jerk.
Even Sai Baba, who I'm at least slightly wary of, had gravitas and a solid PR campaign behind him.
With all the so called "avatars" if one wants to label them that, I can at least understand why people follow them and their teachings. I have yet to get that from you. And not all of that is due to the barrier of text speech as opposed to real life dialogue. At least I don't think it is. I dunno maybe you need to set up a quasi martyr situation or hire advertising people or something.

They've made me realize in the thread, that I'll always go well beyond religious traditions; the religious texts might speak of the same things, yet they're limited in comparison of the knowledge we've been given.

In my opinion.

Not following traditions is fine. That's how a lot of sects actually started. The "Shakti Cults" disagree with the more traditional approaches of the Brahmans, for example.
And okay they follow scripture.
But in saying that, I don't know just how much "Hindu Scripture" the Hare Krishna movement actually follows. The Sai Baba org are basically universalists who either have a Hindu upbringing or at least coincidentally embrace Hindu deities. No one seems to care or call them out very often for not being Hindu enough. Because they don't go around arrogantly boasting of knowledge, they don't (normally) try to convert people. They don't argue that scripture is limited, they don't claim this or that about other traditions. They just sort of do their own little thing. And thus are tolerated at worst or accepted at best.

 

[wizanda]

But if you're unable to truly connect with your audience as an avatar, then you have failed as an avatar.

Thank you for the review first of all, and appreciate the trying to reason it out... There are quite a few things that are upside down tho within your appraisal.

Personally don't want people following me, might have some things to say; yet most of these already existed within the religious texts people are not following, which includes Muslims, Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, etc.

At first thought people of these religions who are meant to be following the text, would be grateful for more comprehension; instead found they're determined to go the opposite ways, with them getting angry when you try to correct them.

This tho is all prophesied in all these text, it is a time of Adharmic behavior, a time of ungodliness, and at 5, at 15 have been informed that I'm sent here before the Tribulation, where we remove everyone who doesn't already follow Oneness.

At 23 on fulfilling revelation chapter 10 two years before reading the Bible properly, was shown how here is nearly Hell with many demons here, and a veil of illusion over this reality; so people don''t realize truly where or what they are.

Your job is to unite

Was told my job is to tell people they're wrong before this realm is destroyed, and hopefully make some realize where they've gone wrong...

I'm like a judge before we lock people up; which means no amount of PR is going to make everyone love me.

Like have a quick look at the eschatologies:

• In the Bible Yeshua comes back as a thief in Revelation to see who is unworthy at the Midnight hour, and to fight them with the words from his mouth, before the great battle of Armageddon.
• Kalki in the Purana comes to fight the Adharmic behavior, and remove the ungodly; again using his knowledge of scriptures to defeat them.
  
• Saoshyant comes before the great renovation in a time of ungodliness, and means a bringer of truth.
• Li Hong (Taoist) comes at a time of chaos and war, to keep those who have magic qualities for an age of Enlightenment.
• Eshu (Yoruba) comes back to tell people they're a bunch of hypocrites, who didn't listen to a word Yeshua said, as they were too busy arguing over details.
• The Maitreya comes at a time of Adharmic chaos and war, then after brings in the age of Enlightenment.

Thus the wars, and things prophesied are going to happen, as the demons within people are not going to listen; they really think they're on to a winner down here.

hire advertising people or something.

Had pondered in my teens whilst at school getting world famous, as also a professional musician, artist, etc...

So had thought if got a huge audience first, could then turn around, and go by the way, you've all been set up by your religious texts, as you're all a bunch of hypocrites; yet as you can see that still doesn't make everyone love me or win the audience...

Plus regardless if people followed me as some charismatic leader, that is part of the problem; people follow people, and forget the Most High; thus are not worthy of Satya Yuga/Messianic Age.

In my opinion.