Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
doppelgänger;941193 said:They've shown a consistent willingness to place party politics and perpetuation of their own power and personal gain ahead of their duty as public servants and fill essential government positions with lackeys. So, no, the Administration and its appointees are not credible sources of information. Not that any Administration is, mind you, but this current one is the imum coeli.
At first I misread that as e. coli.
On the other hand, it may be a very appropriate pun.
Indeed, oh perceptive mother hen.At first I misread that as e. coli.
On the other hand, it may be a very appropriate pun.
Hehe, I almost "ralphed" on that one too.doppelgänger;941214 said:I originally had "nadir."
doppelgänger;941214 said:Pun intended, actually. I originally had "nadir."
Frankly, whenever I hear a politician speak my intergalactic translator automatically transforms their words into real English. For the most part the read-out is blank, but occaisionally I can resolve the odd bit here and there that is actually the opposite of what their words would indicate.
Hehe, I almost "ralphed" on that one too.
Is the US Administration still a creditable source of truth? Why or why not?
Nevertheless, some lie, cheat and steal a great deal more than others. The Bush administration makes the Harding administration look like a Sunday School picnic.They all lie cheat and steal. It doesn't matter what party is in power of even what form of government one has, they ALL lie cheat and steal.
Nevertheless, some lie, cheat and steal a great deal more than others. The Bush administration makes the Harding administration look like a Sunday School picnic.
You can't be serious. The only good thing I can say for the Clintons is that they're not Republicans, but no administration -- and I mean absolutely none -- has achieved the level of dishonesty and corruption (not to mention sheer insanity) this present one has. Not Nixon's, not Harding's, not Clinton's. None of them.I think you are kidding yourself if you think Bush's admin has done more of it than Clintons.
You can't be serious. The only good thing I can say for the Clintons is that they're not Republicans, but no administration -- and I mean absolutely none -- has achieved the level of dishonesty and corruption (not to mention sheer insanity) this present one has. Not Nixon's, not Harding's, not Clinton's. None of them.
However, I think it makes conservative Christians feel better to think the Bush administration isn't more than usually corrupt. That way they don't have to face up to their own lack of moral compass in their blind support for it.
Without a doubt.So in a nut shell Republicans have lost their moral compass?
Without a doubt.
I unfortunately agree, the republican party is all about power and cares nothing for its purported principles.
Apparently, only fetuses have a right to life. Everybody else is SOL under the Republican moral code. Like one million Iraqis, right?Like right to life?
Apparently, only fetuses have a right to life. Everybody else is SOL under the Republican moral code. Like one million Iraqis, right?
Like right to life?