Is the word "Ahimsa" or nonviolence mentioned in Yajurveda?
We discuss every chapter/verse in Rigveda in which the word "peace" has been used in the translation by Griffith, one by one in this thread. I give the fifth such verse:
18. [10-166] HYMN CLXVI. Sapatnanasanam.
1. MAKE me a
bull among my peers, make me my
rivals, conqueror: Make me the
slayer of my foes, a
sovran ruler, lord of kine 2
I am my rivals' slayer, like Indra unwounded and unhurt, And all these
enemies of mine are
vanquished and
beneath my feet. 3 Here, verily, I bind you fast, as the two bow-ends with the string. Press down these men, O Lord of Speech, that they may humbly speak to me. 4 Hither I came as
conqueror with mighty all-effecting power, And I have mastered all your thought, your synod, and your holy work. 5 May I be highest, having gained your strength
in war, your skill in
peace my feet have trodden on your heads. Speak to me from beneath my feet, as frogs from out the water croak, as frogs from out the water croak.
http://www.sanskritweb.net/rigveda/griffith.pdf
One could see that peace in this chapter is not in the meaning of Ahimsa or non-violence or not hurting and harming others. Please
And peace is only sought for one's own people or kith and kin, not for others while with others the conflict has been mentioned in the previous chapters.
One also should note the Veda people fought "battle after battle" not one battle as mentioned previouly.
Spoils are intended to wage war.
Peace is mentioned once in the chapter and word that don't depict peace many times.
Ahimsa (Sanskrit: अहिंसा; IAST: ahimsā, Pāli:[1] avihiṃsā) is a term meaning 'not to injure' and 'compassion'.[2][3] The word is derived from the Sanskrit root hiṃs – to strike; hiṃsā is injury or harm, a-hiṃsā is the opposite of this, i.e. cause no injury, do no harm.[4][5] Ahimsa is also referred to as nonviolence, and it applies to all living beings—including all animals—according to many Indian religions.[6]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahimsa
Following sentences in an earlier post need to be noted:
- "I slay the man who brings no milk oblation". Is it justified? Please
- "he hath slain the godless in the battle". Were these "godless" pagans or Zoroastrians? What religion they had? I don't think that anybody subscribed to "Atheism" in the Veda Period. Right? Please
When and where these chariots Veda People started to use, many a time mentioned in Yajurveda? It is connected with where these verses were revealed. Right? Please
Peacock is mentioned in the chapter. I don't think habitat of peacock is in the Arctic, as one of our friends here beleives.
Right? Please
Anybody, please.
Regards