Whenever clerics are in control of a political system people say it's a theocracy...
But at any point in history has God (or a God) actually been in power?
How is that even possible?
And to what extent can clerics take God's place??? That seems rather presumptuous to me...
I don't think God could ever hold political office, although those who hold political office may claim to represent God...
However: I know that the Roman Empire was technically theocratic as the emperor was considered a God
And the same for the ancient Egyptians
But I'm talking about a God concept that resembles a Supreme Being, rather than a mere human afforded the status of "God" - and I'm talking about political office in the modern sense, in which there is a distinction between the office that a holder may occupy, and the holder of the office him/herself
I don't think a theocracy is possible, because God cannot hold office. He cannot make decisions. But then I suppose one could build a system around what he's said? But then surely that would be government by scripture, or government by revelation - rather than government by God? - and who gets to interpret revelation/scripture???
I'm going to say that theocracy is impossible!
But at any point in history has God (or a God) actually been in power?
How is that even possible?
And to what extent can clerics take God's place??? That seems rather presumptuous to me...
I don't think God could ever hold political office, although those who hold political office may claim to represent God...
However: I know that the Roman Empire was technically theocratic as the emperor was considered a God
And the same for the ancient Egyptians
But I'm talking about a God concept that resembles a Supreme Being, rather than a mere human afforded the status of "God" - and I'm talking about political office in the modern sense, in which there is a distinction between the office that a holder may occupy, and the holder of the office him/herself
I don't think a theocracy is possible, because God cannot hold office. He cannot make decisions. But then I suppose one could build a system around what he's said? But then surely that would be government by scripture, or government by revelation - rather than government by God? - and who gets to interpret revelation/scripture???
I'm going to say that theocracy is impossible!