• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is There Any There There?

esmith

Veteran Member
Just wondering why there has been very little news about the Pakistani IT group and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Now at the present time Imran Awan has only been arrested for basically bank fraud; However, it seems that the FBI is looking into the "groups" involvement in their IT work for Schultz and other House Democrats. Now one must wonder why Schultz continued to pay Awan even after he was banned from the House network on Feb 2, 2017 and did not stop until he was arrested trying to flee the country.
I can not seem to find very many sources for information and haven't really heard anything on the National News networks or in the papers. This is all I can find. The first link supplies further links to specific issues.

EXCLUSIVE: Wasserman Schultz Aide In Pakistan Still Liquidating Assets In US

Additional links
Democratic staffer arrested on bank fraud charge - CNNPolitics.com
Wasserman Schultz Seemingly Planned To Pay Suspect Even While He Lived In Pakistan
FBI investigating smashed hard drives from Wasserman Schultz IT worker's home, Pakistani brothers: Report
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
Just wondering why there has been very little news about the Pakistani IT group and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Now at the present time Imran Awan has only been arrested for basically bank fraud; However, it seems that the FBI is looking into the "groups" involvement in their IT work for Schultz and other House Democrats. Now one must wonder why Schultz continued to pay Awan even after he was banned from the House network on Feb 2, 2017 and did not stop until he was arrested trying to flee the country.
I can not seem to find very many sources for information and haven't really heard anything on the National News networks or in the papers. This is all I can find. The first link supplies further links to specific issues.

EXCLUSIVE: Wasserman Schultz Aide In Pakistan Still Liquidating Assets In US

Additional links
Democratic staffer arrested on bank fraud charge - CNNPolitics.com
Wasserman Schultz Seemingly Planned To Pay Suspect Even While He Lived In Pakistan
FBI investigating smashed hard drives from Wasserman Schultz IT worker's home, Pakistani brothers: Report
Here is another source for the discussion:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...serman-schultz-imran-awan-decision/538821001/
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
Just wondering why there has been very little news about the Pakistani IT group and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Now at the present time Imran Awan has only been arrested for basically bank fraud; However, it seems that the FBI is looking into the "groups" involvement in their IT work for Schultz and other House Democrats. Now one must wonder why Schultz continued to pay Awan even after he was banned from the House network on Feb 2, 2017 and did not stop until he was arrested trying to flee the country.
I can not seem to find very many sources for information and haven't really heard anything on the National News networks or in the papers. This is all I can find. The first link supplies further links to specific issues.

EXCLUSIVE: Wasserman Schultz Aide In Pakistan Still Liquidating Assets In US

Additional links
Democratic staffer arrested on bank fraud charge - CNNPolitics.com
Wasserman Schultz Seemingly Planned To Pay Suspect Even While He Lived In Pakistan
FBI investigating smashed hard drives from Wasserman Schultz IT worker's home, Pakistani brothers: Report
I think there isn't much coverage because Wasserman-Schultz didn't do anything criminally wrong. The staffer certainly did, but that has been covered. Why do you think that it should be covered more?
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Let 'em investigate both. Unlike the Trump camp, I don't think they're shaking in their boots. Unlike the Trump camp, I don't think they're shaking in their boots.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
I think there isn't much coverage because Wasserman-Schultz didn't do anything criminally wrong. The staffer certainly did, but that has been covered. Why do you think that it should be covered more?
where there is smoke there could be a fire.
Isn't that what the Russian investigation is about?:)
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
She was probably just paying him the money he earned when working for her. The article seems to claim this is unlikely, but I disagree. If I quit a job and left the country, I would still be paid for at least a month due to back pay. I would expect to get that money no matter where I was living. So, I guess I don't see anything peculiar here.

What is so suspicious about it?
 

esmith

Veteran Member
She was probably just paying him the money he earned when working for her. The article seems to claim this is unlikely, but I disagree. If I quit a job and left the country, I would still be paid for at least a month due to back pay. I would expect to get that money no matter where I was living. So, I guess I don't see anything peculiar here.

What is so suspicious about it?
He was cut off Feb 9 from the House network, He was arrested July 24 and still on her payroll
Just playing the devils sarcastic advocate
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
He was cut off Feb 9 from the House network, He was arrested July 24 and still on her payroll
Just playing the devils sarcastic advocate
What is the House network? If it is just the internal intranet, then I don't see a problem. Most likely, it was just an oversight.

Obviously, there is no way that if Wasserman-Schultz was paying him for illegal activity, she wouldn't do it through payroll. It is ludicrous to think she would. So, I still don't see any reason to even suspect anything illegal was going on with her.

Just seems like a bit of bad judgment and carelessness on her part. But, I don't see any possibility of criminality. Do you?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
where there is smoke there could be a fire.
Isn't that what the Russian investigation is about?:)
I'm reminded of something that happened here last year....

Friends own a tree service company, The Lumberjacks. They cut down &
chipped trees for a client. Client wanted the chips put in a pile for her use later.
The Lumberjacks did this...a pretty normal thing to do.
Later, they got a call from local government that the chips had spontaneously combusted.
Smoke everywhere.....charred chips on the ground....The Lumberjacks would have to pay
thousands for clean up. Local authorities believed what they claimed because a sheriff's
deputy & the fire dept both saw the 'evidence'.
Upon investigation, my friends discovered there was no fire....no smoke...no charred
chips....nothing but a bit'o steamy air coming from the pile.....all pretty normal.

You know the old saying, "Where there's smoke, there's fire.". Well sometimes,
"Where there's smoke, there isn't even smoke....just hot (moist) air". When people
want to believe that which serves their interest, they will see what they want to see,
reality be damned.
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
It's a typical GOP media distraction. I welcome any investigations into Clinton, DNC, etc. You have to have reasons for criminal activity. The problem with GOP media is they intentionally create phony scandals to sway the herd.
And your thread proves this. What does DWS have to do with some aide and his bank loan? Is this the propaganda technique known as "guilt by association?"

Don't let the establishment getcha esmith.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
What is the House network? If it is just the internal intranet, then I don't see a problem. Most likely, it was just an oversight.

Obviously, there is no way that if Wasserman-Schultz was paying him for illegal activity, she wouldn't do it through payroll. It is ludicrous to think she would. So, I still don't see any reason to even suspect anything illegal was going on with her.

Just seems like a bit of bad judgment and carelessness on her part. But, I don't see any possibility of criminality. Do you?
Probably not, just stupidity. Seems the Dems are good at that....hint Hillary
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
Probably not, just stupidity. Seems the Dems are good at that....hint Hillary
We shouldn't expect politicians to really know IT. I know you wanna pick on them Dems but Repubs aren't all that computer savvy either, RNC got hacked first.
 
where there is smoke there could be a fire.
Isn't that what the Russian investigation is about?:)

The media covers the news that's most relevant to the most amount of people. I don't understand how this man being arrested or her paying him is relevant to anyone other than them and law enforcement officials. What would be the potential fire you see coming out of this and why should I care?

The trump russia investigation impacts the lives of millions of people. You me and every American has the right to know if the president worked with a foreign government to win an election. We also have the right to know if he is currently in anyway still beholden to that foreign government and making decisions based on what is best for America. This smoke could be the sign of a very dangerous fire for all americans.
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
Probably not, just stupidity. Seems the Dems are good at that....hint Hillary
Why are people still talking about Clinton? She did nothing wrong, no criminal activity. Now TrumpCo on the other hand....
I hope the republicans start new investigations into everything they're talking about. But they won't, because the investigations were already done. It's time to move on.

Still think Putin is a better leader than Obama? lmao.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
Why are people still talking about Clinton? She did nothing wrong, no criminal activity. Now TrumpCo on the other hand....
I hope the republicans start new investigations into everything they're talking about. But they won't, because the investigations were already done. It's time to move on.

Still think Putin is a better leader than Obama? lmao.

When did I ever compare Putin and the Obama?
Seems that a Grand Jury should have been convened to make a determination vice a questionable decision from Comey. Maybe we should also look into Lynch and Bill and their tarmac meeting.. Seems real strange that they have a meeting and then Comey comes out and flails the Hillary but gives her a pass; He was in charge of the FBI not an attorney in the DOJ.
 
Top