• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is Violence Against Women Ever Acceptable?

Piculet

Active Member
How is that any different than you attempts to manipulate the discussion in a way that makes you feel more comfortable expressing the immorality of Muslim marriage as described by yourself??
I don't need anything to "make me more comfortable". I'm comfortable with my religion and all of its teachings.

Nevertheless, the significant difference between my communication and that of @ChristineM, is that I do not constantly try to misrepresent what she has previously said.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
I don't need anything to "make me more comfortable". I'm comfortable with my religion and all of its teachings.

Nevertheless, the significant difference between my communication and that of @ChristineM, is that I do not constantly try to misrepresent what she has previously said.

Show me where i have misrepresented anything or apologies for that liable.
 

Piculet

Active Member
With all their might. That may be physically, intellectually, legally or by asking her brothers to have a serious talk with her husband.
So you suggest they either hit back [which isn't wise because a) it isn't wise and b) most women can't win their husband in a physical fight c) it brings nothing good] or do exactly what diyanet in the article says. Your advice is the same except that you also suggest they might as well do the dumbest thing ever. BTW, if you ask the police, they'll also say don't hit back.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
So you suggest they either hit back [which isn't wise because a) it isn't wise and b) most women can't win their husband in a physical fight c) it brings nothing good] or do exactly what diyanet in the article says. Your advice is the same except that you also suggest they might as well do the dumbest thing ever. BTW, if you ask the police, they'll also say don't hit back.
I suggested multiple methods, not only physical. And even if it is physical, it is not to "win", it is to show that violence is not OK.
You'd probably think twice before you hit your wife if you'd have to explain a black eye to your colleagues, even if you "won".
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
I wouldn't appreciate being struck, no. In fact, I'd do a crazy thing and just leave/divorce.

A good spanking is heaven in other contexts.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Unless, of course you live in a religious society. Where the battering husband gets custody of the children, the assets, and you are now just someone else's ex.
Tom

Which is why such societies are, in my view, immoral.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Typical Muslim. Spreading libel and being unapologetic about it. But when I say that your prophet is a ******, you flip out.

I wouldn't say typical, there are many honest and decent Muslims, however there are several large subsets who let the islamic faith down
 

Piculet

Active Member
Typical Muslim. Spreading libel and being unapologetic about it. But when I say that your prophet is a ******, you flip out.
It's not libel when she does it publicly. Not just to me either. Also, I've never been upset about anything you say.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
I wouldn't say typical, there are many honest Muslims, however there are several large subsets who let the islamic faith down
That's what I wanted to say with that. @Piculet is a representative of Islam on this site, one of only a few. His behaviour is indicative because few else speak out.
And I wanted to show an example of how it feels when when he gets hit back.

(It will probably gain me an other warning but that is also part of the demonstration. We all lose.)
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Where does this superior knowledge of yours about what is immoral and what is moral, come from?

Simple human decency and compassion. To think that a man automatically has 'authority' over a woman is the basic problem. A woman is a fully human person, who has authority over herself.

The use of violence against a woman is reasonable *exactly* when violence against a man would be reasonable: self-defense or when they are going to commit violence against someone else.

The double standard of saying a man has authority and can commit violence and the woman does not is deeply, deeply immoral.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
So you suggest they either hit back [which isn't wise because a) it isn't wise and b) most women can't win their husband in a physical fight c) it brings nothing good] or do exactly what diyanet in the article says. Your advice is the same except that you also suggest they might as well do the dumbest thing ever. BTW, if you ask the police, they'll also say don't hit back.

Why no criticism of the man for being violent?
 
Top