firedragon
Veteran Member
Hold on a moment, brother..
I think he's pointing out that Muslims believe these hadiths, and I would say that he is right when it comes to "sunnis", wouldn't you?
Well. Thats correct. He is basing his standard on the Sunni theology. But in that case he has to follow through.
If his whole idea is based on "the Sunnis believe it", he has to follow through and believe everything they say. If not, he has to have a methodology, not just appealing to Sunnis. He also has to believe the prophet Muhammed was a true prophet. Because that is the Sunni Theology.
So without a methodology, you cannot say "I cherry pick this hadith to spread hatred towards Muslims".
This is a person who distributed pornographic images of a man in a beard having sex with a toddler on his lap attributing that image to the prophet Muhammed. So has to validate his stance.
I've asked him not to bombard us, and to consider one or two hadiths at a time.
There is no doubt in my mind that Muslims should not be pacifists.
It is also very clear in my mind that G-d does not like those that start aggression.
It is the classic case of those that claim "how can G-d be both loving and harsh in punishment simultaneously?", imo.
People with roots in a Christian society , often find this contradictory.
Can you explain why this person can cherry pick one hadith, and say "This is historically true", and then reject other hadith as "Historically false"? What is his basis?
Cheers.