Islam will dominate!

[Fatihah]

We have, only you have constantly ignored it and made inane statements like 'it's a statement' or decrying all non-Muslim sources or anything that puts the Mughals or any Islamic Empire in a bad light as faked by Hindus or some anti-Islam pyscho.

Response: Claiming to have provided proof, knowing you clearly haven't is just a sad stance to take. I can barely watch.

 

[301ouncer]

So wait, when someone isn't being a radical pyscho advocating the Muslim conquests, denying all evidence to the contrary and decrying Jews and Christians as inherently untruthful, they're being defeatist? Wow. Defeatism sounds good. 'No True Scotsman' argument again, eh? This is getting old.

And you are so fakedly loved by your comrads adds to my evidence of that you being here nor not. Does not make an iota of difference.

All you do is defend, defend till you are defeated.

 

[xkatz]

Response: The only way to prove that something doesn't exists is to demonstrate that there is no logical proof that it does exist. So from your posts alone, you've demonstrated that fact for us, that no muslim empire conquered land by force, as you don't have the slightest proof that it has.

As I said before, were's the proof? Please provide me actual proof that not a single Muslim empire used force to conquer a land and/or it's peoples.

 

[DeitySlayer]

And you are so fakedly loved by your comrads adds to my evidence of that you being here nor not. Does not make an iota of difference.

All you do is defend, defend till you are defeated.

The first sentence is barely coherent.

The last sentence is a pathetic grab for justification of your viewpoint. No offence, but looking around the slew of messages against your creed of hatred, both from non-Muslims and Muslims alike, I would say that your definitions of 'defend' and 'defeated' are a little screwed up.

 

[301ouncer]

Response: Claiming to have provided proof, knowing you clearly haven't is just a sad stance to take. I can barely watch.

Any chance of being a second wife to me? Hehehhee. My wife will be very angry though.

She is red head and will be having none of it. :no:

She is so intolarent muslim reverted beurifull red head.

 

[Breathe]

(snip)

I don't get what you are attempting to prove here. This post is a non sequitur (as well as many things I shall not name for fear of violating forum rules): it does not follow. It doesn't answer nameless' post. It's also an ignorant and offensive post.

 

[301ouncer]

I don't get what you are attempting to prove here. This post is a non sequitur (as well as many things I shall not name for fear of violating forum rules): it does not follow. It doesn't answer nameless' post. It's also an ignorant and offensive post.

I do not think it is offensive as it is from our divine scripture speaking of the truth. Of course you would find it offensive because it address your religion.

 

[LuisDantas]

Or maybe simply because it is offensive?

 

[DeitySlayer]

I do not think it is offensive as it is from our divine scripture speaking of the truth. Of course you would find it offensive because it address your religion.

You are unable to prove the Qur'an is divine, any more than the Sikhs are able to prove the Adi Granth is divine.

 

[.lava]

i feel dizzy

.

 

[DeitySlayer]

i feel dizzy

.

I know. I think everytime I read one of Fatihah or 301ouncer's posts I lose a few hundred brain cells.

 

[Breathe]

I do not think it is offensive as it is from our divine scripture speaking of the truth. Of course you would find it offensive because it address your religion.

Kindly tell me what my religion is?

That'd save me a lot of soul-searching, if someone who knows nothing about me, probably not even my name, date of birth, city, past life experiences, likes and dislikes, etc, could slap on a religious label for me.

Not to mention if there was a scripture saying "The lowest of people are the Muslims (or Arabs) and those who commit child sacrifice, they are enemies unto you, verily they are an accursed people, and their hearts filled with dread on the last day" you would consider that offensive.

As would I; I have human empathy that extends past my self.

Or maybe simply because it is offensive?

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and sounds like a duck, it is a duck (or shapeshifter ).

So by applying the same logic, yes I guess this is offensive.

 

[.lava]

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and sounds like a duck, it is a duck (or shapeshifter ).

:biglaugh:



you could not help it huh?

.

 

[DeitySlayer]

Do you know what the problem with Fatihah and 301 (mostly Fatihah, 301 uses some half-decent evidence, and sometimes accurate arguments) is? They put themselves on some high spiritual ground and pretend they know some deep mystical bollocks that the rest of us 'mere mortals' can't grasp, and then use this as a rationale for ignoring any rational argument or proof to the contrary.

 

[dust1n]

Or maybe simply because it is offensive?

:biglaugh:

 

[.lava]

Do you know what the problem with Fatihah and 301 (mostly Fatihah, 301 uses some half-decent evidence, and sometimes accurate arguments) is? They put themselves on some high spiritual ground and pretend they know some deep mystical bollocks that the rest of us 'mere mortals' can't grasp, and then use this as a rationale for ignoring any rational argument or proof to the contrary.

unfortunately this conversation is more like a monolog than a dialogue

.

 

[Fatihah]

Do you know what the problem with Fatihah and 301 (mostly Fatihah, 301 uses some half-decent evidence, and sometimes accurate arguments) is? They put themselves on some high spiritual ground and pretend they know some deep mystical bollocks that the rest of us 'mere mortals' can't grasp, and then use this as a rationale for ignoring any rational argument or proof to the contrary.

Response: Another vain poster? Exactly who are you talking to? This is another example of a person knowing that their arguments are absurd. So in an effort to gain support and some credibility, you now must address others about me in an effort to get them to support you. So sad. Why else would a person address other members about another poster. Your vanity is just another example of a defeated poster.

 

[Breathe]

:biglaugh:



you could not help it huh?

.

I couldn't, I have no idea why I said it, but I liked it, hon.

 

[.lava]

You are unable to prove the Qur'an is divine, any more than the Sikhs are able to prove the Adi Granth is divine.

Qur'an is a holy book and we hold it as divine. but it is not possible to prove or to put faith in hearts of people. no human can do that other than individual himself. too bad some Muslims try to prove it and as a result they answer unasked question

.

 

[Fatihah]

As I said before, were's the proof? Please provide me actual proof that not a single Muslim empire used force to conquer a land and/or it's peoples.

Response: Refer to post 445.