• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Israel Declares War After Hamas Attacks

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Hamas has a long record of using Palestinians as human shields, this the onus is on them, imo.

BTW, the "head of the snake" is not Hamas but is Iran, so...
 

Bthoth

Well-Known Member
Apparently, they don't know whether they succeeded in killing the one Hamas commander, but they know they killed a lot of civilians. It is hard to see how this attack could not be considered a war crime.
I saw that interview too. The colonel did not care, nor could confirm that the target was even killed. They are not in there to confirm but children are being killed that is being measured with a daily count equating to over 400 per day.
 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
Heres another good example of alternatives to dealing with Hamas and points out how the present approach will just make things worse

 

Bthoth

Well-Known Member
Hamas has a long record of using Palestinians as human shields, this the onus is on them, imo.
Do you have recorded evidence or just opinions as evidence?
BTW, the "head of the snake" is not Hamas but is Iran, so...
Why is that? How could Iran be the head of the problem?

is it because they have 38 million and israel is afraid that sooner or later, they will not be able to hold back?

Or is it because the ayatollah created the "RED LINE" that isreal "will not touch that mount" and israel believes him?

Starting a war with iran, is not what "WE the People" are for. STOP IT!
 

Bthoth

Well-Known Member
Here's some for you. Well known long before the present war:

Hamas' use of human shields in Gaza - NATO StratCom https://stratcomcoe.org/cuploads/pfiles/hamas_human_shields.pdf
i thank you for the publication (sourcing)

I did read it and I thank you. My only reservation is that in the list of references, the majority are News and then IDF publications.

I do not trust the IDF but most of the claims and comment do make sense and the acts should be condemned.

The setting is ugly as cramming 2 million into a concentration camp will and does have collateral damage.

Thank you for the additional information, at least you are trying.
 

Copernicus

Industrial Strength Linguist
Meanwhile, it is still considered a war crime to attack human shields, ...
I tend to believe that it certainly should be viewed as such.

But, be that as it may, please answer the following questions:
  • Where in international law is this declared?

I don't know whether your legal degree is from the same educational institution as mine--Wikipedia--but you can take the same course in Human Shield (law), which lists Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions. That said, it's certainly beyond my competence to argue the finer points of international law, so we'll both have to agree that it should be viewed as such.


  • What guidance would you give the victims of the October 7th pogrom when it's perpetrators retreat behind a complex and sophisticated network of human shields?

That's a very tough question to answer, although, if we are going to use the term "pogrom" loosely, I would also apply it to the current Israeli response to the October 7 terrorist attack. And the advice I would give the victims of October 7 would likely be the same advice you would give this father:

Israel Gaza: Father loses 11 family members in one blast


I know that it is just one tragic anecdote, but these kinds of atrocities are made up of many such anecdotes. The IDF justifies its attacks on densely populated civilian areas as legitimate war targets because of the presence of Hamas fighters and munitions. When it happens in northern Gaza, they often cite their warning to civilians to flee south, taking the position that prior warning somehow mitigated their use of such lethal force. However...

Strikes on south Gaza: BBC verifies attacks in areas of ‘safety’


There is nowhere for civilians to go in Gaza. They tend to gather around areas that are considered safer because of protections mandated by international law. However, Hamas also uses those same areas as staging areas for attacks and storage of weapons. So Israel designates them as legitimate military targets. Catch-22 everywhere.
 

Orbit

I'm a planet
The propaganda war is disturbing.

The below was posted on twitter, but similar statements actually have been made in past few days by Netanyahu and other Israeli officials. The person in question actually resigned Oct 13th, but remains a member of the Knesset. I can't yet find a news story associated with the quote, so who knows, but it's example of the toxic information environment surrounding Israel-Gaza. The tweet:

Israel's Public Diplomacy Minister: "Erase all of Gaza from the face of the earth. That the Gazan monsters will fly to the southern fence & try to enter Egyptian territory or they will die & their death will be evil."

And then there's this: Israeli rabbis tell Netanyahu that Israel has a right to bomb Al-Shifa hospital in Gaza

On the other side, there was a Hamas leader speaking, quoted in Hamas chief: We won’t discuss recognizing Israel, only wiping it out

"The Hamas leader in the Gaza Strip on Thursday dismissed US and Israeli demands that it lay down its arms and recognize the Jewish state, saying the terror organization is instead debating “when to wipe out Israel.”

It was just as bad, but from the other direction-- HOWEVER, a bunch of recently created Iranian twitter accounts are posting old, inflammatory speeches from years ago and labeling them "current Hamas leaders".

What a mess.
 

Left Coast

This Is Water
Staff member
Premium Member

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
That's a very tough question to answer, although, if we are going to use the term "pogrom" loosely, ...
What if we don't "use the term ... loosely" but, rather, rely on the guidance provided by the United States Holocaust Museum Holocaust Encyclopedia. In what was October 7th not a pogrom? And why are you so intent on watering down or otherwise blurring the term?
 

Left Coast

This Is Water
Staff member
Premium Member
i thank you for the publication (sourcing)

I did read it and I thank you. My only reservation is that in the list of references, the majority are News and then IDF publications.

I do not trust the IDF but most of the claims and comment do make sense and the acts should be condemned.

The setting is ugly as cramming 2 million into a concentration camp will and does have collateral damage.

Thank you for the additional information, at least you are trying.

Using the term "concentration camp" is loaded as it has an obvious anti-Jewish history. But yes, Israel and Hamas both are fully aware that Gaza's density and Hamas' use of civilian infrastructure to conduct their operations would lead to an outsized civilian death toll. That's exactly what Hamas wants, unfortunately.
 

Orbit

I'm a planet
I don't have the energy, frankly, to dive into the biases of this report. Nearly all criticism of Israel, not Hamas or Egypt. An implicit belief that Israel should, I guess, open its borders in the middle of a war with a group of people who want to destroy them. Just baffling.
Do you think it isn't a real issue? It's the first thing I thought of when the bombing started. What about people on dialysis, oxygen, heart monitors, in incubators, respirators, who need prescription medications, who are in wheelchairs etc? Do they not matter? Is thinking about them "biased"?
 

Left Coast

This Is Water
Staff member
Premium Member
Do you think it isn't a real issue? It's the first thing I thought of when the bombing started. What about people on dialysis, oxygen, heart monitors, in incubators, respirators, who need prescription medications, who are in wheelchairs etc? Do they not matter? Is thinking about them "biased"?

You'll note that none of what you replied to criticized discussion of people with medical needs in Gaza. Maybe go back and reread what I actually said. My criticism is the framing of those concerns as entirely the fault of Israel. And the suggestion that Israel open up its borders in the middle of a war.
 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
Israel and Hamas continue to be on the wrong side of history
 
Top