• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Israel Declares War After Hamas Attacks

Bthoth

Well-Known Member
There are gas chambers where people are being burned alive?
Let me guess, now the ww2 atrocities are the only description of concentration camp?

Geeze?


Refugees, yes.
Concentration camp, no.
100% concentration of human beings, uprooted from their homes and property based on ethnic divide.

I never understood how a population that had family go thru the holocaust could even remotely put people into a concentration camp (gaza) and allow their own government to do it. I have no doubt that if they were here they would slap their children.
Both populations are victims exhibiting trauma response.

It's like throwing two animals who have been abused into the ring with one another.
Strange point of view. I figured the people were brethren until one side was given weapons and capable of over powering the other.
I blame Christians - Christians started zionism, Christians waged ww1, ww2, Christians want Jews in Israel for the Christian version of Armageddon to start. Christians want ww3 to start.
I agree on the first 2 sentences but that last one is not kind.

I try not to impose blame on a religion itself. But yes, ww2 was a christian based population and yes more zionist are christian than Jewish by far.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I never understood how a population that had family go thru the holocaust could even remotely put people into a concentration camp (gaza) and allow their own government to do it. I have no doubt that if they were here they would slap their children.
Nationalism & religion create the "other",
who is unworthy of human rights.
We see it with Russia attacking Ukraine, &
Israel attacking Palestinians. Sometimes
it's just tribalism. Sometimes it's the belief
that the "other" is unworthy, eg, infidel,
less than human.
 

idea

Question Everything
... yes, ww2 was a christian based population and yes more zionist are christian than Jewish by far.

Two pit bulls in the ring fighting each other. Which dog do you root for? do you bet on?
PETA doesn't bet on either dog, sees who the real monsters are, sees who made those dogs so defensive and mean in the first place. Sees who threw them in the ring.

Christians created this.
Christians threw them both in the ring.

The people who are currently betting on the fight - they can watch from a distance. Some of those betting will make quite a bit of $$ on it.

Perhaps if the dogs were smart enough, they would stop fighting each other, and turn to the real monsters in the room.

harsh? Christians really do want WW3. They want their 2nd coming, so they are creating WW3.

There will be no 2nd coming. It's all illusions, fantasies, groupthink, imagined salvation....

We'll fight WW4 with sticks and stones as Einstein predicted.
 

Copernicus

Industrial Strength Linguist
...Since Israel ignored warnings in advance of the attack, I think that the Netanyahu government deserves a lot of the blame for what happened. So do many Israelis think that, apparently. However, the situation is very different now. Israel has largely eliminated the threat of another such attack in the near future.

To the extent they've done so, it's because they've killed Hamas fighters and destroyed their capability to launch further attacks. IOW, exactly what you're opposing them having done.

False. Hamas was effectively neutralized after Israel woke up, mobilized, and rushed troops to surround the Gaza strip. The threat of a renewed sneak attack became moot even before Israel started its bombardment, which killed far more Palestinian Gazans than were even involved in the October 7 attack. Israel was never in danger of being conquered militarily by Hamas, although it enjoyed vastly more international support before it began to take revenge on the civilian population.

...The task now is to root out and destroy Hamas.

And to free the hostages.

That would be nice, but many may already have been killed along with the Hamas terrorists and the civilians who had nothing to do with the attack. I really hope that they can save most of the hostages, but it is not at all clear how many still remain to be saved. And I don't think that their recovery was the main objective for Israel's response. That was payback for the October 7 attack.

How do you root out and destroy Hamas with no bombs or missiles?

Negotiation and gradual, methodical occupation. Showing some concern for the lives of noncombatant Palestinians would help Israel to build international support rather than hemorrhage it.


...Actually, they weren't compelled to release any hostages. They did so at the urging of the Qatar government as an attempt at confidence-building towards negotiations.
The notion that those two things are mutually exclusive, or that the timing had nothing to do with a looming Israeli ground invasion, strikes me as rather silly.

Nevertheless, it was pressure from Arab allies of Hamas, not the Israeli bombardment, that led to the token release of hostages in an attempt to broker some kind of negotiated release for more. It failed completely because of the utter indifference of the Israeli government to any kind of negotiation, so that ended the effort. The vast majority of hostages are now either still in captivity or dead.

If they released all the hostages, their bit of leverage would be gone. How you leap from "Hamas still has hostages" to "Israel should use no military force to defeat Hamas," I have no clue.

Normally, hostage negotiators work incrementally and try to implement confidence-building activities. That is actually the argument that the Qatar government seemed to be trying to start, but the Israeli government was more interested in punishing Hamas and the general Palestinian population that they blamed for the attack.

We know why they've restricted supplies to Gaza. They don't want them diverted by Hamas. And they know Hamas is sitting on supplies it's not giving to its people.

Exactly. So Hamas can outlast the general population, whose suffering is reported on daily. Not a winning strategy. Better to let the supplies in, even if Hamas does also get access to some of them. It is possible that the IDF could be part of the distribution by allowing obvious noncombatants into safe areas that it screened and guarded. Securing safety for children, the elderly, and other obvious noncombatants would have been especially welcomed by Palestinians, many of whom were never huge supporters of Hamas to begin with and had nothing to do with the attack.


A ground operation is exactly what they're doing. And if you don't think they're militarily consulting with the US, I'm not sure what to tell you.

Bombardment of densely populated areas with missiles and aircraft is not exactly a ground operation. They have recently started some ground operations. I didn't say that Israel wasn't consulting with the US, but it takes time for the US to organize and send in advisers with experience in urban warfare. It isn't at all clear that advice on lessons learned from Iraq is what the IDF wants to hear. However, much of what is happening is not being shared with the public. All we know is that Israel is not showing the restraint that the US has been urging. That much has been made public.

...More effective, perhaps, would be to bring in Arab governments that would be willing to help once Israel stopped the indiscriminate bombings and expressed some willingness to receive their help....Right now, I think that Israelis would feel very nervous about letting Arab states take over the occupation and administration of Gaza, since they could help to rearm Hamas clandestinely. Moreover, I think that most Arab states are now in a position where it is politically impossible to be seen as doing anything at all to help Israel out of its self-created mess.

Sounds like you're conflicted about this option.

Absolutely. I'm not foolish enough to think I have all the answers or that anyone else here does, either. All we can do is debate the options as we know them, but the real decisions need to be made by people with actual knowledge of conditions and expertise in military and diplomatic operations. What we do know is that the numbers of Palestinians killed by Israeli bombardments and the cutoff of humanitarian aid has caused vastly more suffering among Palestinians than Israelis felt on October 7. So it is totally delusional to think that Israel can expect the rest of the world to accept the horror of the initial attack as sufficient justification for its subsequent acts of retribution, which have involved the deaths of large numbers of non-Hamas non-combatants.


Proportionality is not assessed based simply on number of casualties per side in a conflict.

No, but there appear to be no factors that weigh in favor of an assessment where Israel's response to October 7 comes out as reasonably proportionate to what the Hamas terrorists did. If the idea was to get hostages released, then why haven't more hostages been released?
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
Are you claiming that Israel has no responsibility
for the oppression that led to the Hamas attack?
Nor for Israel's war crimes?
Both sides have committed war crimes if you care to look. Both sides have responsibilities for what led to the current situation, but Hamas are the ones that provoked the response from Israel at the moment and as to why the casualties amongst civilians is so high.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
Israel and Israel alone is responsible for it's actions. What they do and have done is not the fault of Hamas. IDF could be more precise and specific, they could specifically target Hamas operatives, but they have been widely, largely and mostly punishing civilians. That isn't normal war.
So you are an expert on warfare and particularly of this kind? You got the last sentence right, given that terrorists like Hamas essentially produce the response that has come about - by hiding within the population. They have brought the wrath of Israel down upon the population. Hamas declared war on Israel even if they might not have intended to do so, and as such, of course they play a large role in what Israel is doing - in order to get at them.

This is Israel holding all Palestinians guilty. But they've been doing that since 06/07, when Hamas was able to win more than really did due to a part of Gaza elections that are staggered and winner takes all. And they reiterated the idea of "**** you if you're Palestinian" a couple years ago when they decided Palestinians of East Jerusalem would not be allowed to participate in a Palestinian Legislative election, and ultimately that was a big reason that election was called off.
This is more similar to when Boudica waged her terribly cruel and violent uprising against the Romans (she returned the favor and started by killing Roman women and children).
It's like Vlad Dracul III and the harrowing cruelty and violence he learned from his oppressors (the Ottoman Empire) and turned against them and others.
Or do you think Uncle Sam is guiltless amd did nothing to provoke raids by the Natives against white settlers?
Hamas wrote the script for this and the population of Gaza are paying the price unfortunately.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
What would you suggest?
Means that punish Hamas rather than civilains and others who are not to be targeted.
Offering a decent two state sollution and no more bombing civilians in exchange for helping to oust Hamas leaders could probably motivate the Palestinians amd even many in Hamas real quick and get better results than have ever been seen.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
So you are an expert on warfare and particularly of this kind?
I've clearly studied it more than many here have, especially in regards to terrorism. There is so mucy history to draw parallels from that we can say, with confidence, that Israel is messing up. Even Obama recently criticized their actions, pointing that what they are doing will drive more Palestinians to join Hamas. We have seen the same exact thing happen so many times throughout history there just is no other foreseeable outcome.
You got the last sentence right, given that terrorists like Hamas essentially produce the response that has come about - by hiding within the population.
Hamas did not produce the attacks or bombs that destroyes hospitals, schools and homes. They launched a very nasty attack about a month ago. Since then the IDF and the IDF alone bears responsibility for killing several times more civilians than Hamas did and are acting of their own accord as they keeo at it.
They have brought the wrath of Israel down upon the population.
No, Israel made the blockaides more strict and Israel alone created a humanitarian crisis over it.
Hamas declared war on Israel even if they might not have intended to do so, and as such, of course they play a large role in what Israel is doing - in order to get at them.
Except Israel isn't getting at them but everybody else.
Hamas wrote the script for this and the population of Gaza are paying the price unfortunately.
Hamas did not make IDF bomb a refugee camp. The IDF alone bears responsibility for what the IDF does, and it is the IDF who are guilty of slaughtering thousands.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
I've clearly studied it more than many here have, especially in regards to terrorism. There is so mucy history to draw parallels from that we can say, with confidence, that Israel is messing up. Even Obama recently criticized their actions, pointing that what they are doing will drive more Palestinians to join Hamas. We have seen the same exact thing happen so many times throughout history there just is no other foreseeable outcome.
Probably will but it hardly takes much to get many Muslims to join some particular jihad or other.
Hamas did not produce the attacks or bombs that destroyes hospitals, schools and homes. They launched a very nasty attack about a month ago. Since then the IDF and the IDF alone bears responsibility for killing several times more civilians than Hamas did and are acting of their own accord as they keeo at it.
Not so. If one does a particular action and expects no response then you are either naïve or foolish. Hamas knew perfectly well that to get at them they would put the civilian population at risk of harm - and this is exactly what is going on - even though Israel is trying to minimise casualties.
No, Israel made the blockaides more strict and Israel alone created a humanitarian crisis over it.

Except Israel isn't getting at them but everybody else.

Hamas did not make IDF bomb a refugee camp. The IDF alone bears responsibility for what the IDF does, and it is the IDF who are guilty of slaughtering thousands.
Dismiss any responsibility from Hamas how you like but this is delusional in my view.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Means that punish Hamas rather than civilains and others who are not to be targeted.
What would you suggest?

Offering a decent two state sollution and no more bombing civilians in exchange for helping to oust Hamas leaders could probably ...
Could probably? How very novel and objective. What do you know about the history of the "Two-state Solution"? Anything at all?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Both sides have committed war crimes if you care to look. Both sides have responsibilities for what led to the current situation, but Hamas are the ones that provoked the response from Israel at the moment and as to why the casualties amongst civilians is so high.
It's arguable that Israel provoked Hamas (&
other resistance organizations, eg, Fatah, PL0)
given that Hamas is a reaction to oppression
that existed before Hamas's inception.
Hamas's recent attack is just the latest in a
series.
Regarding the war crimes, USA has no influence
over Hamas. However USA supports Israel's
war crimes with financial & military backing.
This support should be used to coerce Israel
to obey international law, & honor human
right of Palestinians.
 
Last edited:

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Oh, my ...


It's not a particularly good editorial, but it's worth noting because Israel Hayom

is an Israeli national Hebrew-language free daily newspaper. Distributed for free around Israel,[6] it is the country's most widely distributed newspaper. Owned by the family of Sheldon Adelson, a personal friend and benefactor of Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel Hayom has often been criticized for portraying Netanyahu in an overly positive light.​
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
It's arguable that Israel provoked Hamas (&
other resistance organizations, eg, Fatah, PL0)
given that Hamas is a reaction to oppression
that existed before Hamas's inception.
Hamas's recent attack is just the latest in a
series.
But this is just determinism, events follow each another without recourse to actual free decision making. So why expect Israel to behave differently?
 

Bthoth

Well-Known Member
Two pit bulls in the ring fighting each other. Which dog do you root for? do you bet on?
I suggest that you be careful, comparing israelis to dogs could get you into trouble especially if you come across the extremist that consider israelis as Jews
PETA doesn't bet on either dog, sees who the real monsters are, sees who made those dogs so defensive and mean in the first place. Sees who threw them in the ring.
Peta is even more dangerous
Christians created this.
Christians threw them both in the ring.
The UN created ISRAEL
The people who are currently betting on the fight - they can watch from a distance. Some of those betting will make quite a bit of $$ on it.
Business has no use of virtue
Perhaps if the dogs were smart enough, they would stop fighting each other, and turn to the real monsters in the room.
Call alfred hitchcock, that could be a movie.
harsh? Christians really do want WW3. They want their 2nd coming, so they are creating WW3.
OK...... Can't stop what 'they' want. I try to keep my feet flat on the ground
There will be no 2nd coming. It's all illusions, fantasies, groupthink, imagined salvation....
I already know that.
We'll fight WW4 with sticks and stones as Einstein predicted.
OK..
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
But this is just determinism, events follow each another without recourse to actual free decision making. So why expect Israel to behave differently?
Oh, but there is freedom of choice.
Israel could've chosen to not oppress
Palestinians, not to evict them from their
homes, etc. 70 or so years of making
these choices leads to enduring hostilities.
 

Left Coast

This Is Water
Staff member
Premium Member

True. This is a fun game!

Hamas was effectively neutralized after Israel woke up, mobilized, and rushed troops to surround the Gaza strip. The threat of a renewed sneak attack became moot even before Israel started its bombardment, which killed far more Palestinian Gazans than were even involved in the October 7 attack. Israel was never in danger of being conquered militarily by Hamas, although it enjoyed vastly more international support before it began to take revenge on the civilian population.

The threat isn't for Israel to be "conquered" by Hamas. The threat is for them to carry out further terrorism. They have made it clear that they will use whatever breathing room they're given to plan and carry out those attacks. While holding people hostage. Simply surrounding them is obviously not sufficient.

That would be nice, but many may already have been killed along with the Hamas terrorists and the civilians who had nothing to do with the attack. I really hope that they can save most of the hostages, but it is not at all clear how many still remain to be saved. And I don't think that their recovery was the main objective for Israel's response. That was payback for the October 7 attack.

We disagree.

Negotiation and gradual, methodical occupation. Showing some concern for the lives of noncombatant Palestinians would help Israel to build international support rather than hemorrhage it.

Negotiation can't destroy Hamas or neutralize its ability to carry out terrorism. Occupation comes with its own costs that Israel doesn't want. But I'll remember that you recommended occupation. We're being told incessantly right now that the only reason Hamas carries out terrorism is because of occupation.

Nevertheless, it was pressure from Arab allies of Hamas, not the Israeli bombardment, that led to the token release of hostages in an attempt to broker some kind of negotiated release for more.

This is facile reasoning. Why did the Arab allies pressure them? Because Israel was attacking them and they want their ally Hamas to stay in power instead of being defeated.

It failed completely because of the utter indifference of the Israeli government to any kind of negotiation, so that ended the effort. The vast majority of hostages are now either still in captivity or dead.

We're in the middle of the fighting. It remains to be seen what will happen with the hostages.

Normally, hostage negotiators work incrementally and try to implement confidence-building activities. That is actually the argument that the Qatar government seemed to be trying to start, but the Israeli government was more interested in punishing Hamas and the general Palestinian population that they blamed for the attack.

We disagree.


Exactly. So Hamas can outlast the general population, whose suffering is reported on daily. Not a winning strategy.

If they have access to fewer supplies, obviously their ability to outlast is diminished.

Bombardment of densely populated areas with missiles and aircraft is not exactly a ground operation. They have recently started some ground operations.

Both/and, not either/or. Two things can be true. Israel's likelihood of success in a ground operation is increased by destroying the military infrastruture of their enemy in advance. Which is what they've done.

I didn't say that Israel wasn't consulting with the US, but it takes time for the US to organize and send in advisers with experience in urban warfare.

Oh Jesus come on Copernicus. It's 2023. The internet exists. Enough.

Absolutely. I'm not foolish enough to think I have all the answers or that anyone else here does, either. All we can do is debate the options as we know them, but the real decisions need to be made by people with actual knowledge of conditions and expertise in military and diplomatic operations. What we do know is that the numbers of Palestinians killed by Israeli bombardments and the cutoff of humanitarian aid has caused vastly more suffering among Palestinians than Israelis felt on October 7. So it is totally delusional to think that Israel can expect the rest of the world to accept the horror of the initial attack as sufficient justification for its subsequent acts of retribution, which have involved the deaths of large numbers of non-Hamas non-combatants.

Both/and, not either/or. Most of Israel's allies can both denounce the October 7th attack, and recognize that it obviously demands a military response and advocate for Palestinian civilian lives to be protected. Like the US right now, for example.

No, but there appear to be no factors that weigh in favor of an assessment where Israel's response to October 7 comes out as reasonably proportionate to what the Hamas terrorists did.

You'd only reasonably know that if you had access to Israeli intelligence and military operations. You just said decisions need to be made by people with actual knowledge of the situation on the ground. If Israel's attacks have caused significant damage to Hamas' infrastructure and ability to carry out future attacks, that's relevant to the assessment.

If the idea was to get hostages released, then why haven't more hostages been released?

Again, we're mid-fight. Let's see what happens.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
Oh, but there is freedom of choice.
Israel could've chosen to not oppress
Palestinians, not to evict them from their
homes, etc. 70 or so years of making
these choices leads to enduring hostilities.
We are talking about the current situation, not old baggage that could be traced back thousands of years. Mind you, partitioning has often caused issues, so I'm not letting the British off the hook as to such - just as in the formation of Pakistan where they appeared to mess it up. But it takes two sides to form agreements.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
We are talking about the current situation, not old baggage that could be traced back thousands of years.
But history going back 70 years is relevant.
Should the reason for Hamas's existence &
motivation be understood? Yes.
That means knowing history before 2023.
Know your enemy.
Mind you, partitioning has often caused issues, so I'm not letting the British off the hook as to such - just as in the formation of Pakistan where they appeared to mess it up. But it takes two sides to form agreements.
The power to effect change often lies with
one side.
Should we have given responsibility to end
slavery to slaves or the enslavers?
 
Last edited:

Bthoth

Well-Known Member
We are talking about the current situation, not old baggage that could be traced back thousands of years.
Apartheid has been ongoing since the 1947 UN resolution (modern world). Even now the settlers of Israel are terrorizing the palestinians of the west bank which had nothing to do with 10/7/23 (current situation).
Why would israel allow such crimes and not blow them up, like HAMAS and GAZA?

Point: Such atrocities create more hatred and division.
Mind you, partitioning has often caused issues, so I'm not letting the British off the hook as to such - just as in the formation of Pakistan where they appeared to mess it up. But it takes two sides to form agreements.
Sure, the agreements did have issues, as the british themselves did not have the right to break up the palestinian lands so the UN did it. But do you have any idea of the amount of terrorism that irgun (now IDF) imposed upon the british? Zionist dug bunkers underground in palestine to hide weapons used to fight the british. The british finally gave up and the UN took over managing the divide.

What do you think the world would be like, if the palestinians controlled the levant and not the israelis?

Much of what the HAMAS is doing they learned from the terrorist that enabled the creation of israel.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
But history going back 70 years is relevant.
Should the reason for Hamas's existence &
motivation be understood? Yes.
That means knowing history before 2023.
Know your enemy.
Not for this I though, given that they basically declared war against Israel either deliberately or inadvertently, and they are getting a result which I suspect they didn't want even though there is so much outrage towards Israel because of the carnage involved.
The power to effect change often lies with
one side.
Should we have given responsibility to end
slavery to slaves or the enslavers?
If there is no trust then all we tend to get is antagonism, and possibly ending in conflict or war, as in this case. How would I know how to solve such issues?
 
Top