I still don't get how you're getting from 'party wants to promote traditional family' to 'party wants to ban all opposition.'
Simplifying and isolating one position sells short my argument. It's based on the actual views espoused, as well as use of rhetoric and history. "Promoting traditional family" is also a classic euphemism used by extremist groups the world over - depending who you're talking to, it can mean basically whatever they want it to, and almost always tends to mean "any family in the '
in group'" as a-posed to "literally any other ethnic or social group". And, as I have explained, fascism is not solely defined by totalitarianism, but is a complex and malleable ideology that often cloaks intent behind rhetoric and insinuation.
I mean that is a huge stretch.
It's as though some folks believe social conservatism inevitably leads to Fascism. This is the same as me saying Leftism inevitably leads to gulags.
Meloni has engaged with numerous fascist red flags - embrace of mythicizied tradition, targeting of minorities, use of moral panics to generate manufactured consent. These are all strong indications of fascist intent. And that's ignoring the embrace of outright fascist talking points and slogans.