• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Jailed for Refusing to Cite the Pledge

dust1n

Zindīq
Danny Lampley, a North Mississippi attorney, caused a stir on October 7, 2010, when at the behest of judge Talmadge Littlejohn, he refused to cite the pledge of allegiance. Littlejohn found Lampley in contempt of court and threw him in jail. The story was picked up by the AP and dissemenated around the globe at the speed of light.



Of course, Lampley was well within his constitutional rights to refuse to cite the pledge, an issue that was decided by the Supreme Court in 1943. But, if one only read the AP's initial report, he or she likely missed another of Lampley's important contributions to sanity: In 1995, Lampley, working as an attorney for the ACLU of Mississippi, represented Lisa Herdahl when she sued the Pontotoc County School District about the issue of school prayer.



A national story at the time, Herdahl was new to Mississippi and was shocked to find that school prayer was given every morning over the school's intercom system. When she asked the school board to stop the prayers, they ignored her. Her children became social pariah at the North Pontotoc Attendance Center, and one teacher even solved the problem by having one of Herdahl's children wear a pair of headphones during the morning prayer, humiliating him before his classmates. Herdahl was forced to take legal action.



Represented by Lampley, Herdahl won the case, but paid a steep price in Pontotoc when she refused to move. She was "threatened, forced to change houses" and she found herself "virtually unemployable in the area."



Those two examples are connected, not only by Lampley, but by two institutions of Mississippi willfully disregarding settled law, something that for me is completely unsurprising. In my view, Mississippi's national reputation for backwardness is deserved. The people of its small communities pride themselves on that backwardness, their sticking to tradition come what may. The problem with that desire for insular communities untainted by outside influence, though, is that it is becoming more and more unsustainable in an age of instantaneous information that circles the globe faster than one can say "under God".



It is hard to ignore the parallels to the story of another sanity award winner, Contance McMillen, who sued Itawamba Agricultural High School, also located in North Mississippi, and saw her story reported and discussed across the country. Twenty years ago, no one would have heard about Contance McMillen. No one would have heard about Lisa Herdahl or Danny Lampley. Today, those stories find audiences far outside Mississippi's borders, and I think that is a good thing. It is becoming more and more difficult for the majority to tyrranize minorities in Mississippi. Mississippi is being dragged kicking and screaming into the global age.



In Lampley, I see a pattern of standing up to those who would disregard the edicts of the Constitution, a pattern of standing up for civil rights, a man who has the courage of his convictions. In Mississippi, a state widely viewed as a cultural backwater, a reputation that, in my view as a native Mississippian, is deserved, I am encouraged that people like Lampley are here, fighting for sanity in a state that desperately needs it.



Jailed for Refusing to Cite the Pledge: Danny Lampley - Jason M. Wester - Open Salon




I agree with this opinion piece heavily.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Such cases would make insular little southern communities look like the exception rather than the rule to us heathens. But I find that judges in dang near every
city & county regularly ignore the actual law for their own personal & community standards. I'm glad I no longer spend much time in court with landlord-tenant
cases....I saw many rulings based entirely upon the judges' whims. That's not good for the mental health of a constitutional originalist.
 

linwood

Well-Known Member
I can`t for the life of me figure how a judge could think for a moment he was in the right.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
I can`t for the life of me figure how a judge could think for a moment he was in the right.
What I can't figure out is how someone who apparently cares so much about the Pledge of Allegiance would be so quick to throw away "liberty and justice for all".
 
Unfortunately this is not atypical of the attitudes of judges around the world, many of whom seem to think the law exists to serve them and not the other way round.
 

dust1n

Zindīq
Such cases would make insular little southern communities look like the exception rather than the rule to us heathens. But I find that judges in dang near every
city & county regularly ignore the actual law for their own personal & community standards. I'm glad I no longer spend much time in court with landlord-tenant
cases....I saw many rulings based entirely upon the judges' whims. That's not good for the mental health of a constitutional originalist.

It is unfortunate that judges are granted this and this problem has been around for way too long. The real question is how do we intergrate a system of checks and balances on the city and county level?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It is unfortunate that judges are granted this and this problem has been around for way too long. The real question is how do we intergrate a system of checks and balances on the city and county level?
Ever see the movie "Dune"?
Heart plugs.....heart plugs on all judges.
 
Last edited:

Skwim

Veteran Member
From an Oct. 8th Orlando Fla. TV station website.
i-Poll
Did a lawyer deserve to be jailed for not reciting the Pledge of Allegiance?

Yes (46%)

No (54%)


source
Yes (46%) :facepalm:

 
Top