questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Let me demonstrate a humble way how to work for the Research Progress more
efficiently, keeping in mind for myself that ``You were steeped in sin at
birth; how dare you lecture us!'' John 9:34.
These are the most straightforward proofs of many research tasks.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12946.73923
It is Nihilism to reply ``there are no proofs'' without reporting mistakes.
F. Nietzsche defines Nihilism as rejecting an obvious truth, like 2+2=4.
I have proofs because I was trying to write mathematical proofs, not a
description of how to castrate a cat or something. I explicitly put the word
``proof'' into the text. This proof is unpublished yet, but it is a valid
proof until mistakes are reported. Please do not reply to me in such a
Nihilistic, discriminatory way, saying:
You have no proof, not because we have a report of mistakes, but because
we do not trust you. We rely only upon famous authors, professors of
mathematics. The well-known scientific problems are not for you. They are for
famous, established authors only.
It is natural for ordinary persons to feel distrust and rejection against an
unfamiliar, low score, unpublished author because the true information must
come from a trustful source. Described condition for the validity of information
was seen already in the first century: ``Nazareth! Can anything good come from there?'' John 1:46.
But this self-protective instinct is abnormal for scientific journals; they are the Enterprises of
Truth Making with the duty to deal fairly with such unacknowledged, ``dirty'', unknown authors.
Hollywood is the movie star-making factory, and the journal is the Truth making factory.
As an epigraph to the present mind-blowing work,
I am rephrasing the famous Dr. Niels Bohr:
Any true idea is crazy, and it is crazy enough to be true.
efficiently, keeping in mind for myself that ``You were steeped in sin at
birth; how dare you lecture us!'' John 9:34.
These are the most straightforward proofs of many research tasks.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12946.73923
It is Nihilism to reply ``there are no proofs'' without reporting mistakes.
F. Nietzsche defines Nihilism as rejecting an obvious truth, like 2+2=4.
I have proofs because I was trying to write mathematical proofs, not a
description of how to castrate a cat or something. I explicitly put the word
``proof'' into the text. This proof is unpublished yet, but it is a valid
proof until mistakes are reported. Please do not reply to me in such a
Nihilistic, discriminatory way, saying:
You have no proof, not because we have a report of mistakes, but because
we do not trust you. We rely only upon famous authors, professors of
mathematics. The well-known scientific problems are not for you. They are for
famous, established authors only.
It is natural for ordinary persons to feel distrust and rejection against an
unfamiliar, low score, unpublished author because the true information must
come from a trustful source. Described condition for the validity of information
was seen already in the first century: ``Nazareth! Can anything good come from there?'' John 1:46.
But this self-protective instinct is abnormal for scientific journals; they are the Enterprises of
Truth Making with the duty to deal fairly with such unacknowledged, ``dirty'', unknown authors.
Hollywood is the movie star-making factory, and the journal is the Truth making factory.
As an epigraph to the present mind-blowing work,
I am rephrasing the famous Dr. Niels Bohr:
Any true idea is crazy, and it is crazy enough to be true.