TheFragranceOfHoliness
Active Member
All the ones that are true.Hello, May I ask you which scriptures do you feel are true?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
All the ones that are true.Hello, May I ask you which scriptures do you feel are true?
2 Timothy 3:16-17All the ones that are true.
Very good scripture, I feel each scripture we read helps us get a little more insight, and when we don't take into account some scriptures, this may create a poor or a weak understanding.
Then a voice from the cloud said, “This is my Son, my Chosen One. Listen to him.” -Luke 9:35 New Living Translation
I believe we should let Jesus do all the talking: John 17:3, John 20:17, John 3:16 Jesus Words Alone!
I and the Father are one, can be understood as perfect unity. If we listen to Jesus advice -John 17:23
2 Corinthians 8:8I think all the words in the bible are inspired, and are in the Bible for a very good reason.
I believe we should let Jesus do all the talking: John 17:3, John 20:17, John 3:16 Jesus Words Alone!
And another conversation in private with the disciples, This is what the disciples and Jesus have to say:
Matthew 16:13-17
I am not really that good with debates. I am just trying to be a Christian, and I feel it starts with reading the words of Jesus and doing what he says.Once again you contradict yourself. Did you read Matthew 16:13-17?
Let's take a look:
13 When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?”14 They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”15 “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?”
Here's a question for you @walt:
Is Jesus asking the disciples for his OWN words back at him, or is he asking the disciples to explain in their own personal words? Let's continue:
16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.”
Next question: Why is Peter answering in his own words when he should, according to your personal theology, simply parrot Jesus' words back at him? Remember, it's "Jesus Words Alone!", right? Let's continue:
17 Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven.
Please read carefully and understand Jesus's response here @walt. Jesus does NOT admonish Peter for using his own words. In fact, he praises Peter because he realizes the work of revelation that has taken place in him.
So the idea of "Jesus Words Alone!" is simply not supported by scripture, and we have shown this using the scriptural support you gave us.
As such, I think the "red letter only" phase of our discussion can be closed. While "red letter only" is useful for study, we should not limit ourselves to ONLY the words of Jesus. That would be a "man made doctrine", wholly unsupported by scripture.
This is ridiculous reasoning imo.
With this concept, then, since “nobody is good, except one”,
and this is Jesus, then his Father isn’t good. Just Jesus.
As @walt pointed out, Jesus & his Father (known as Yahweh) are two totally different people, whose oneness, as Jesus specifically stated, is in unity and purpose.
I really don't understand, what is your point please?2 Corinthians 8:8
I speak not by commandment, but by occasion of the forwardness of others,
and to prove the sincerity of your love.
And?I really don't understand your point?
If you used a better translation than one that is over 400 years old, you probably will get better understanding of God's word. But maybe not.2 Corinthians 8:8
I speak not by commandment, but by occasion of the forwardness of others,
and to prove the sincerity of your love.
I cannot increase your understanding.I really don't understand, what is your point please?
I do not need anything written by anyone nor any translation of anything,If you used a better translation than one that is over 400 years old, you probably will get better understanding of God's word. But maybe not.
2 Corinthians 8:8...
"I am not commanding you, but I want to test the sincerity of your love by comparing it with the earnestness of others." NIV
"I am not saying this as a command, but I am testing the genuineness of your love by comparison with the eagerness of others." NET
"I do not say this as a command, but I am, by mentioning the eagerness of others, testing the genuineness of your love." NRSVue
Did I ask you for any understanding? I asked you what is your point? You must be making comments for a particular reason?I cannot increase your understanding.
He also said this to Peter shortly after the above...Once again you contradict yourself. Did you read Matthew 16:13-17?
Let's take a look:
13 When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?”14 They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”15 “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?”
Here's a question for you @walt:
Is Jesus asking the disciples for his OWN words back at him, or is he asking the disciples to explain in their own personal words? Let's continue:
16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.”
Next question: Why is Peter answering in his own words when he should, according to your personal theology, simply parrot Jesus' words back at him? Remember, it's "Jesus Words Alone!", right? Let's continue:
17 Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven.
Please read carefully and understand Jesus's response here @walt. Jesus does NOT admonish Peter for using his own words. In fact, he praises Peter because he realizes the work of revelation that has taken place in him.
So the idea of "Jesus Words Alone!" is simply not supported by scripture, and we have shown this using the scriptural support you gave us.
As such, I think the "red letter only" phase of our discussion can be closed. While "red letter only" is useful for study, we should not limit ourselves to ONLY the words of Jesus. That would be a "man made doctrine", wholly unsupported by scripture.
If you asked me for the reason of my point then you did not understand my point.Did I ask you for any understanding? I asked you what is your point? You must be making comments for a particular reason?
Oh, now I see. You are the repository of all wisdom!I do not need anything written by anyone nor any translation of anything,
to know what is true and what is not true.
I use the bible when dealing with them that refer to the bible.
When in Rome, speak Italian.
Or you didn't express yourself clearly (which is probable).If you asked me for the reason of my point then you did not understand my point.
I did not express myself at all. Therefore you are incorrect , again.Or you didn't express yourself clearly (which is probable).