sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Nope. Same concept. God is a community and a relationship -- not a being.apples and oranges
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nope. Same concept. God is a community and a relationship -- not a being.apples and oranges
Actually sojourner, Paul is talking about authority. Just as Christ is head of the congregation, he has authority over it, so the Christ is subject to God, who has authority over him. As to Christ referring to Jesus the human, how can you say that? Christ was already resurrected and in heaven by the time Paul wrote Corinthians. Paul was called by Christ to be an apostle, so your assertion is incorrect. IMO.he's talking about hats, for Pete's sake, and using an example that people can understand in order to drive his point home. How do you reconcile the statement in the same passage that the man is the head of the woman? Or are you a misogynist?
Remember, the biblical writers use a lot of simile and metaphor. "Christ" refers to Jesus-the-human, just as "man is head of the woman" refers to a cultural-specific practice of patriarchy. It's stuff the audience would have understood, when he's making his point about hats.
He's talking about social convention, and we're not even sure that the statement is Paul; it's probably a later interpolation.Actually sojourner, Paul is talking about authority. Just as Christ is head of the congregation, he has authority over it, so the Christ is subject to God, who has authority over him.
Because it's within Paul's style to do that. He's given to holding Jesus up as an example -- a human example -- for people to emulate. As a human, Jesus would have been subject to God -- it's something his audience can understand and relate to. Yet, at the same time, Jesus is also perfected as a Divine being due to the resurrection. It's a both/and thing, which is precisely what the doctrine of the Trinity says: Jesus is both fully human and fully Divine.As to Christ referring to Jesus the human, how can you say that?
Right, which is why it's a both/and thing for Paul.Christ was already resurrected and in heaven by the time Paul wrote Corinthians.
What does this have to do with the issue???Paul was called by Christ to be an apostle, so your assertion is incorrect. IMO.
it's a theological assertion, not an ontological opinion.
What I'm saying is that theology does not have to have a factual base in order to work.I believe you are saying that theology does not have to be based on reality. So does this mean Christians ought to be searching the sheep herds for Jesus simply because He is called the lamb of God? Reality says that Jesus was in human form.
Of what then does Peter talk of when he says in (King James Version) 1Peter1:3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead....He's talking about social convention, and we're not even sure that the statement is Paul; it's probably a later interpolation.
Both Paul, and Peter acknowledge Jesus has a God, and father over him....
yes Christ died leaving us a model to follow closely, his life course. But is Jesus both fully human, yet fully divine? What do the scriptures say?Because it's within Paul's style to do that. He's given to holding Jesus up as an example -- a human example -- for people to emulate. As a human, Jesus would have been subject to God -- it's something his audience can understand and relate to. Yet, at the same time, Jesus is also perfected as a Divine being due to the resurrection. It's a both/and thing, which is precisely what the doctrine of the Trinity says: Jesus is both fully human and fully Divine.
(American Standard Version)1Peter 3:18 Because Christ also suffered for sins once, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God; being put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit;
(King James Version) 1Corinthians 15:50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.
According to these scriptures, is Jesus right now at this moment in heaven, a spirit, or human?
Context does really matter in this instance. When he spoke of Christ he was speaking of him as a divine being, one raised to spirit life in heaven, returned to the glory he originally hadRight, which is why it's a both/and thing for Paul.
You have said that on a few occasions now, so could you then reconcile your reasoning with:And human beings don't enjoy eternal glory, do they? Only divinity is eternally glorious. Hence, according to Paul, Jesus is both/and.
You have said that on a few occasions now, so could you then reconcile your reasoning with:
1/(American Standard Version)1Peter 3:18 Because Christ also suffered for sins once, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God; being put to death in the flesh,but made alive in the spirit;
• sojourner, is Jesus now a spirit (being what angels are), or is he physical, in other words flesh and blood?
2/ (King James Version) 1Corinthians 15:50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.
• if flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom, how do you say that the resurrected Jesus is both fully human, and fully divine?
IT's not talking about heaven. The Kingdom or coming Kingdom is going to be on earth. (Too many verses to list on that one). There is not a single verse in the bible that tells us "that when we die we will go to heaven." Everything is on earth. Jesus comes back to earth, sets up a kingdom on earth. We will reign with him on earth, etc.! Corinthians 15:50 merely means that flesh and blood do not qualify one as a registered tenant in the kingdom that is of or from heaven.
Flesh and blood is our sin nature. We enter into the Kingdom when we are granted immortality when Christ comes back. And only then, we will not be "flesh and blood".The word, kleronomeo (inherit), speaks not to a litteral placement of the person but of that person's right to enter so as to have residence. And man can only enter the kingdom of heaven by cleaning up his spirit so that his spirit is holy after the image of God. A man cannot qualify by means of flesh and blood as apart from a holy spirit his flesh remains corrupt.
Jesus was given all the power in heaven and on earth, so, effectively, your OP can't be true.
/according to scripture..
IT's not talking about heaven. The Kingdom or coming Kingdom is going to be on earth. (Too many verses to list on that one). There is not a single verse in the bible that tells us "that when we die we will go to heaven." Everything is on earth. Jesus comes back to earth, sets up a kingdom on earth. We will reign with him on earth, etc.
Flesh and blood is our sin nature. We enter into the Kingdom when we are granted immortality when Christ comes back. And only then, we will not be "flesh and blood".
Your taking the word "spirit" out of context.No, flesh and blood is but the shell which clothes a man. A man's spirit is charged of God to be in control of that vehicle that it be kept in it's proper place.
The spirit that we have in us can be a few different things. The spirit can be God's Spirit in us, or us having a "spirit" mind, which is having a spiritual mind of Christ, etc. But we are not 'given" a spirit, like some people think we are given a "soul". Which of course is not scriptual at all.The very reason we have to make choices and are judged by those choices is that we make those choices with our minds thus demonstrating the spirit that we allow to prevail in us.
It's talking about after baptism. We put off the old man, we have to "think" differently now, we have to have a spiritual mind, etc....That is why we be renewed in the spirit of our mind:
Ephesians 4:21 If so be that ye have heard him, and have been taught by him, as the truth is in Jesus:
22 That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts;
23 And be renewed in the spirit of your mind;
24 And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness.
Your taking the word "spirit" out of context.
The spirit that we have in us can be a few different things. The spirit can be God's Spirit in us, or us having a "spirit" mind, which is having a spiritual mind of Christ, etc. But we are not 'given" a spirit, like some people think we are given a "soul". Which of course is not scriptual at all.
It's talking about after baptism. We put off the old man, we have to "think" differently now, we have to have a spiritual mind, etc....
IT's not talking about heaven. The Kingdom or coming Kingdom is going to be on earth. (Too many verses to list on that one). There is not a single verse in the bible that tells us "that when we die we will go to heaven." Everything is on earth. Jesus comes back to earth, sets up a kingdom on earth. We will reign with him on earth, etc.
Flesh and blood is our sin nature. We enter into the Kingdom when we are granted immortality when Christ comes back. And only then, we will not be "flesh and blood".
We are not born having a sin nature as is so commonly taught. Our sin nature is the result of our corrupting ourselves as we learn and apply ungodly wisdom from our youth on up. Sin, by virtue of it's own nature corrupts our natural nature, bending our natural nature away from godliness and causing our souls to crave sinful things.
Jesus didn't have the same nature as us. That is not even the narrative. Where does Jesus ''sin''?Absolutely not! We ARE born with a sin nature! We are prone to sin. If not, we would not sin. Jesus had the same nature as us. "Sin by it's own nature, corrupts our natural nature?" What is that all about..... Sin does not have it's own nature. Our natural nature is prone to sin. We have a sin nature, we are prone to sin. We sin.
.
Jesus didn't have the same nature as us. That is not even the narrative. Where does Jesus ''sin''?