• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

jewish

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Huh? A set of documents that has thousands of 100% accurate, fulfilled prophecies, and thousands of embedded codes, doesn't show its level of accuracy?!
Nope as any serious and objective study of such would tell you.

Just one example: On the women's visitation to Jesus' tomb, why is it that of the four accounts, no two are fully alike? Look for how many angels were there; where were/was they/he located; and what did the angel(s) said? There are many areas whereas we see what theologians call "variations".

What you fail to see is that all of the scriptures were written by humans from subjective points of view, and throughout the vast majority of the Church's history the scriptures were not viewed as being totally inerrant in every respect. To make it supposedly inerrant is dangerously close to idolatry.
 
Top