Greatest I am
Well-Known Member
Gnostic Christianity is part of Christianity - you're talking about people trying to destroy things.
Yes. Immoral Christians which is about all one can say about a misogynous and homophobic creed.
Regards
DL
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Gnostic Christianity is part of Christianity - you're talking about people trying to destroy things.
"I dislike religion, so I think the state ought to pass laws dictating acceptable theology according to what is in line with my atheistic liberal opinions."
I'm sure you have a deeply informed, well-researched and nuanced understanding of Christian history.
No. I'm interested in teaching children how to have empathy for people who are different from them and how to reason based on currently available evidence.You're interested in "re-education camps" for those with different points of view and the indoctrination of children to believe a certain way which is compliant with the desires of a specific group?
Where did you get that from? Nobody should have to support anything against their will (unless that lack of support causes harm, such as a man failing to support his children).You would not allow people to act on their desires not to support the actions of others they do not like?
Murder, legal prejudices and assault to mention three.When you say "to rob people of their rights or harm them in other ways", what specific actions are you referring to which rob or harm?
I think there is hope for them. There is non violence in the Holy Quran. However, one would think God would submit us all with goodliness and a compassionate heart and Islam would admit wrong for the sake of love the one God.
How can u forbid that when atheists are minority in Christian west?
When we'll take it upon ourselves to forcible censor one text for "immoral content," we'll do for anything. If you censor one thing over interpretations of violence, where would you stop? The Dawson College shooter said Megadeth's song A Tout le Monde influenced him to do that.
It's not the books that are our enemies, it's people that want to use the books as weapons that tend to give us headaches.
I say let people believe whatever they want to, just don't let them do whatever they want to. We should also make it a point to foster good education and reasoning skills in society. I believe those things would help reduce the use of scripture as justification to rob people of their rights or harm them in other ways.
Indirectly. Scripture is just scripture. The best way of defending against its misuse is by far simply by learning better and spreading the education.
I find your statement that the Bible is "immoral" or denigrates women to be unfounded. )
I don't care for religion but can't favor oppression as a tool against religion.
Like another said, education is the key.
Inspire, but not motivate. I said it in my post, a teaching is just a teaching, it can be interpret to harm others, but I haven't seen one religion just going out and preaching murder.
What??? ROFL! Abrahamic religions are the worst tools of dominating masses that have ever been created. I think I don't think to quote any scriptures on that. No wonder most people is meak, coward and conforming these days. e.g. they teach us not to lie, steal and kill, while governments do all of that, all the time! They teach us that being rich and having sex is bad, while the Elite that rules the World is immensely rich and enjoy every imaginable pleasure available. The old trick of "do what I say, but not what I do".
About scriptures, no, they shouldn't be amended, they should be forgotten as mass manipulating myths. Do they have some truth in them? Of course, if you believe in Jesus and ask him the protection of Archangel Michael you will be protected. Now, should you buy the whole package and believe everything in the book? You would end up like Ned Flanders. Now who is really Jesus and Michael? Well, you'll have to find that out by yourself (ask them who they are).
I think it's pointless to get some book like Mein Kampf and reinterpret it until it ends up being a children's bedtime story. In the same way it would be loosing time to get the Quran and reinterpret verses like:
8:12 [Remember] when your Lord inspired to the angels, "I am with you, so strengthen those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip."
9:5 And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.
So much for "forgiving and merciful"! Maybe only to new forced converts! What was the big threat of polytheists anyway? Were they the "competition"?
Then you could wonder why so much violence would be needed against unbelievers. They don't believe because they didn't see, right? Duh! Allah, just present yourself so they see you and they'll believe in you. Otherwise you can "strike" them on their necks and fingertips for their whole life and they'll have even less faith than what they had before!
I could go on citing Deuteronomy and Leviticus in the Bible, etc. but it's beyond the point. Bad books and bad religions should be abandoned.
Anyway most people is in abrahamic religions only because they were made members when they were helpless toddlers, not because of the quality of those paths. So people must learn to question everyone and everything, study History and wake up! The Bible and the Quran are not the only options!
In other words, you want God to change his mind about homosexuality because you think God is mistaken concerning it? In any case, completely getting rid of scripture will not achieve your desired result, because some people on their own, without the influence of scripture will still find homosexuality repugnant. What will you want then? To declare that only your preferences are then legally acceptable; and that others who hold contrary views are not entitled to their preferences by law? You would destroy agency so that you can feel accepted by those people who do not accept you? Who then is the tyrant?
I have always been a believer in the right of association. All individuals have the right to associate with whom they wish for whatever reason they wish and in whatever capacity and to whatever extent they wish. Conversely, all people have the right not to associate with whomever they wish, and not to associate with for whatever reason. Happiness is mostly derived through human associations. I have no problem with your finding happiness in associating with whomever you wish, for whatever reason you wish, but you don't like it if I do the same thing. You would deny me my rights not to associate with you if I wish not to? The point of a right is that I do not have to justify my not wanting to associate with you. It is just my preference because I don't like you or what you are doing. It's that simple. I think you just need to get over yourself. There are plenty of people out there who accept you. Be happy with them and leave the rest alone.
There is non-violence, sure, among the violence.
- Those in hell will be chained together. Their clothing will be made of pitch and fire will cover their faces. 14:49-50
How exactly would you educate those who are indoctrinated with that list above?
Regards
DL
Sure but we should still try to make their book less intolerant. Even good Muslims will likely go for that if their hierarchy does not threaten those who want the changes.
Regards
DL
Hey, GIM
kx000 from sciforums here. All I have to say is subconsciously everyone objectively believes in God and can be made to submit. We all posses desire and God is grace.