• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Just Accidental?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
Yes, it has been addressed by me. And you avoided answering the question when I asked it, as you have done again here.

We can measure the wind and observe its effects. How do we measure god(s)?

We can measure God's existence by the evidence that is all around us....the stuff you assume is accidental.
We measure God by what we observe in creation...by the tenacity of life itself. A weed growing in the cracks of the pavement is testimony to how tenacious life really is....designed to take all opportunities to self replicate even against the odds, to perpetuate their species.

It's not in the realm of human experience either, which is the perspective from which you've determined everything you seem to think you need to know about the universe.
So much for that argument.

Oh, but God's existence IS in the realm of human experience. We have written testimony by eye witnesses who saw the operation of God's spirit in miraculous ways, in many different times and in many different encounters. How is their testimony any less valid than a bunch of bones in a rock? Each one needs an interpreter. Each ones interpreter exhibits bias in the translation of that evidence. Science has no advantage over ID.....they are simply better at marketing it.
 
Last edited:

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
Yes, given that it's obvious from your posts and your repetition of stale and erroneous talking points.
But of course, there is no repetition from the evolutionist's camp is there?
gaah.gif


How is it possible at this point that you still think that the entirety of the evidence for evolution consists only of the fossil record?

I don't.....but I also believe that every branch of science operates from the same premise....that evolution is a fact and that all evidence must support it. They therefore operate within that premise when coming to their own conclusions. Ever heard of bias? Ever studied the power of suggestion when an agenda is being pushed? Psychology works.

Seriously, I need to know.
Need to know what? That you can't see past what you want to believe? Irresistible force....meet immovable object.
looksmiley.gif
 

Shad

Veteran Member
But of course, there is no repetition from the evolutionist's camp is there?
gaah.gif

They are pointing out your reliance on creationist arguments that are moot in biology.



I don't.....but I also believe that every branch of science operates from the same premise....that evolution is a fact and that all evidence must support it.

Considering there are branches of science that predate evolution by centuries you belief is wrong. Find me where Newton used the premise that evolution is true for Newtonian physics? *hint You wont=

They therefore operate within that premise when coming to their own conclusions. Ever heard of bias?

Irrelevant as the basis for this point is false.

It is hilarious to hear you bring up biases when you are deep within a religious one



Ever studied the power of suggestion when an agenda is being pushed? Psychology works.

You should look up psychology regarding religion. This is far more damaging for your view than the view you reject.
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
They are pointing out your reliance on creationist arguments that are moot in biology.

I do not see that science is on the same level as religion, even though I do see equivalent religious fervor displayed by many of its devotees.

You treat science like I treat God.....did you not notice this?
worship.gif


Considering there are branches of science that predate evolution by centuries you belief is wrong. Find me where Newton used the premise that evolution is true for Newtonian physics? *hint You wont=

Ever heard of adoption? The poor orphaned child was so alone that all the sciences decided to become its surrogate daddy. Tell me what branch of science rejects evolution.....?

Irrelevant as the basis for this point is false.

In whose opinion?

It is hilarious to hear you bring up biases when you are deep within a religious one

If you had kept up with the theme of this thread, you would understand that I have equated these two belief systems all along.
You have no more proof for organic evolution than I do for an Intelligent Designer. Your position is not superior to mine just because science markets its beliefs better than ID proponents do.....then we have to consider the nonsense that creationist rattle on with, so no wonder we are behind the eight ball......yet this is exactly the position that the Bible says we would be in at this time in history....go figure.
looksmiley.gif


You should look up psychology regarding religion. This is far more damaging for your view than the view you reject.

The same psychology works for the power of suggestion, no matter what the subject is. Advertisers know full well that the way to get your product out there is to shoot down the other fellow's product and tell them how much better off they are with yours. Truth is lost in the marketing. Have you never heard of perception management?......look it up.
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
All I've asked is if you would like to learn about evolution. You haven't answered that question yet. And I do believe in a creator, so please don't assume anything.

I have spent many years investigating evolution. I only have to read their articles or listen to their videos to see and hear the vague language that evolutionist use, but their devotees never seem to notice. It doesn't take long to discover that evolution is a massive fraud, masquerading as scientific fact. Evolution is sold to the masses by deception....everything is based on assumption....but assumptions are not facts.
You cannot take adaptation, which involves minor changes within a species, and turn it into "a microbe became a dinosaur".
Throwing millions of years at this scenario will never make it true. There is simply no way to prove that it ever happened.

Now, don't tell me...let me guess...have you sold out to theistic evolution......?
sigh.gif
That appears to be the place where Christians or those who want to believe in a Creator, yet are led to also believe in evolution, compromise God's word and creative genius to sell out to the opposition. I won't do that.
no.gif
There is no need.
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I have spent many years investigating evolution. I only have to read their articles or listen to their videos to see and hear the vague language that evolutionist use, but their devotees never seem to notice. It doesn't take long to discover that evolution is a massive fraud, masquerading as scientific fact. Evolution is sold to the masses by deception....everything is based on assumption....but assumptions are not facts.
You cannot take adaptation, which involves minor changes within a species, and turn it into "a microbe became a dinosaur".
Throwing millions of years at this scenario will never make it true. There is simply no way to prove that it ever happened.

Now, don't tell me...let me guess...have you sold out to theistic evolution......?
sigh.gif
That appears to be the place where Christians or those who want to believe in a Creator, yet are led to also believe in evolution, compromise God's word and creative genius to sell out to the opposition. I won't do that.
no.gif
There is no need.

Would you like to learn what evolution really is?
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Yes, they "believe", alright. More faith-based dogma to clutter men's thinking.
All the world is dark to people who deliberately keep their eyes shut. The blindness is yours, the dogma is yours, the delusion is yours. You are welcome to live with it. I simply refuted your fantasy that the nonsense of ID is gaining any traction in science.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
:facepalm: Good grief.

You are joking, aren't you?

This same webpage have already posted in one of the older threads, because I have already read it.

It is largely an apologetic page, making up excuses for the bible's inconsistencies, without a single evidence to back up each of the claims the author made.

I couldn't take it seriously back then, I can't it seriously now.
What are you talking about?! This just tells me that you didn't read it. There's all forms of evidence presented!

On many different subjects!
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Thanks Dad....that was a nice story...what else have you got?
eghfal.gif
Anything that actually includes a power greater than man's limited imagination that can guide and direct the writing of a simple story of human origin and history and then preserve it for many thousands of years despite all attempts to destroy it? Anything.....?
I'll finish off this discussion by just posting an overall comment that summarize our discussion from my perspective, including this last post that I think is quite snarky, btw.

In order for you general scenario vis-a-vis evolution and theistic creation to be the truth, what you have done was to formulate probably the single biggest conspiracy theory ever devised dealing with science. What you put forth would involve many thousands of research scientists all working to create a fictional story. Therefore, that would make them either ignorant, dishonest, or both-- probably the latter. If that somehow makes sense to you, hey, it's a free country.

While virtually stereotyping and essentially demeaning all these scientists, you then elevate a theistic belief system that virtually has no objective support to substantiate it. None. Nada. Nyet. As impossible as it is for you to accept, one simply cannot provide one shred of objectively-derived evidence to indicate that there was one deity that fabricated our universe, inspired scriptures, and then will judge people after they die. If it could have been done, it would have been done, but no such evidence exists-- even though I sincerely wish it did.

But what you also do is to defy common sense. What we see every day of the week is change, and material objects, including genes, change over time. Many changes are detrimental. and we know that, but they largely get weeded out through natural selection. Unfortunately some persist. If "God" created us all directly, then miscarriages and children borne with serious birth defects would logically indicate that he is one mean and nasty deity, going by your scenario. An unborn or newly borne baby cannot sin, so what kind of deity would punish him/her for that?

However, I certainly do not go to the polar extreme of saying there cannot be a God or Gods, but I'm simply not willing to have a blind faith in this regard. I read the Bible daily as it provides inspiration to me and many others, but I also read other scriptures and also philosophies as well. Instead of how God is portrayed through the Abrahamic religions, I tend to drift more in the direction of Baruch Spinoza and Albert Einstein, namely that God is so integral with our universe as to be inseparable from it (sorta panetheistic/panentheistic/ deistic-- too beyond my pay-grade to lean more one way or the other). This puts me into "Whatever is, Is" camp. Can I prove this approach to be the correct one? No. Do I know it's the right one? No. It's a "leaning" that I have.

In conclusion, the only thing that stops you from accepting the obvious, namely that there has been and still in an evolutionary process whereas new "kinds" eventually emerge along some lines, is an interpretation of a creation narrative that we know simply is not true, as it simply doesn't reflect what the overwhelming evidence is telling us, not only as scientists but also those who actually study theology in an objective manner. Instead of accepting both known scientific evidence and serious theology, you choose to reject both. But that's clearly your right.

Take care, and this concludes my part of the discussion.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
All the world is dark to people who deliberately keep their eyes shut. The blindness is yours, the dogma is yours, the delusion is yours. You are welcome to live with it. I simply refuted your fantasy that the nonsense of ID is gaining any traction in science.
Please, gimme a break!

A poll taken of 'working or actively researching' scientists? It goes without saying, those who have a commitment to keeping their jobs?
Or else end up like Sternberg?

Hooray for the 1 to 2 percent who are actively working, and honest enough to admit macroevolution, aka CD, is not even close, by the evidence, to providing an answer for the diversity of organisms! That's your fantasy.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Please, gimme a break!

A poll taken of 'working or actively researching' scientists? It goes without saying, those who have a commitment to keeping their jobs?
Or else end up like Sternberg?

Hooray for the 1 to 2 percent who are actively working, and honest enough to admit macroevolution, aka CD, is not even close, by the evidence, to providing an answer for the diversity of organisms! That's your fantasy.
You those few "scientists" who are in pay-roll of the Discovery Institute, the sham dishonest pseudoscience organization front of the fundamentalist Christians? Yeah, they are like the scientists who worked for the tobacco lobby. Fortunately science now is alert to these attempts by political-ideological-religious groups to undermine it through these sham front groups, whether tobacco lobby or climate change deniers or evolution deniers . Thus their efforts at undermining science is becoming less and less effective.

Sternberg should have been kicked out long long ago. Dishonesty is not tolerated in science. Better late than never...
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
....one simply cannot provide one shred of objectively-derived evidence to indicate that there was one deity that fabricated our universe, inspired scriptures, and then will judge people after they die. If it could have been done, it would have been done, but no such evidence exists-- even though I sincerely wish it did.

I don't believe you "sincerely wish", because there is "objectively-derived evidence", if a person objectively reads the Bible. For example:

Moses' getting it right regarding the 10 steps of Creation? (You know the odds of that?)

The ratios used in building Noah's Ark?

The Mosaic Law's commands on cleanlines, and quarantining those who handle the dead?

Job 26:7?

Isaiah 40:22?

I really could go on and on. I will later, if you want me to. Gotta go, life beckons.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
I don't believe you "sincerely wish", because there is "objectively-derived evidence", if a person objectively reads the Bible. For example:...

The Bible is not largely "objective", it's much more subjective. For example, in your post you assume that Noah's Ark actually existed, and yet there's simply no such archaeological evidence that it did. What you think Moses did is also entirely subjective since he only shows up in early Jewish literature that cannot be verified as historical fact in any way.

The important thing here is that just because you believe something doesn't mean that this something must be true.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
I do not see that science is on the same level as religion, even though I do see equivalent religious fervor displayed by many of its devotees.

Good as science has more reliable methods.

You treat science like I treat God.....did you not notice this?
worship.gif

Hardly as you reference a 2-3k holy book as the single authority on many subjects while I do not. I do not worship science as you worship God. I do not worth science in the hopes of an afterlife like you do. All I have done is establish you are clueless regarding science, nothing more.


Ever heard of adoption? The poor orphaned child was so alone that all the sciences decided to become its surrogate daddy. Tell me what branch of science rejects evolution.....?

Irrelevant as evolution is a modern subject thus has no connection to previous knowledge as per my example of Newtonian physics. You are backpedaling from your gross error. Other branches of science view of evolution is irrelevant.


In whose opinion?

According to the inductive reasoning which you used. I know you have no idea what I am talking about but that is typical for you.



If you had kept up with the theme of this thread, you would understand that I have equated these two belief systems all along.
\

Which is in error


You have no more proof for organic evolution than I do for an Intelligent Designer.

150 years of evidence building shows otherwise.

Your position is not superior to mine

Mine has evidence, yours does not.

just because science markets its beliefs better than ID proponents do.....

It markets nothing. You are thinking of ID since it relies on appeals to the masses as experts continuously reject it's claims

then we have to consider the nonsense that creationist rattle on with, so no wonder we are behind the eight ball......yet this is exactly the position that the Bible says we would be in at this time in history....go

You mean like yourself? Rattling on because your iron age text says so. Hilarious



The same psychology works for the power of suggestion, no matter what the subject is.

Yet it is religion that is taught by laymen, indoctrinates it's youth before they even have a basic understanding of anything. Hilarious

Advertisers know full well that the way to get your product out there is to shoot down the other fellow's product and tell them how much better off they are with yours. Truth is lost in the marketing. Have you never heard of perception management?......look it up.

You points all do more damage to religion than science.

Perception management such as an iron age text is right but modern science is completely wrong. Hilarious....
 

gnostic

The Lost One
I don't believe you "sincerely wish", because there is "objectively-derived evidence", if a person objectively reads the Bible. For example:
The Bible is not largely "objective", it's much more subjective. For example, in your post you assume that Noah's Ark actually existed, and yet there's simply no such archaeological evidence that it did. What you think Moses did is also entirely subjective since he only shows up in early Jewish literature that cannot be verified as historical fact in any way.

The important thing here is that just because you believe something doesn't mean that this something must be true.
And believing in something like a book written 2000 years or more, a book that contained god, demons, magic and miracles, have nothing to do with being "objective".

Belief is always "subjective"...and with regards to religion, based on believing in superstitions and wishes.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
You those few "scientists" who are in pay-roll of the Discovery Institute, the sham dishonest pseudoscience organization front of the fundamentalist Christians? Yeah, they are like the scientists who worked for the tobacco lobby. Fortunately science now is alert to these attempts by political-ideological-religious groups to undermine it through these sham front groups, whether tobacco lobby or climate change deniers or evolution deniers . Thus their efforts at undermining science is becoming less and less effective.

Sternberg should have been kicked out long long ago. Dishonesty is not tolerated in science. Better late than never...
So, according to your view, no matter what evidence ID proponents supply, it will always be dishonest?
Wow, so much for open-minded discussion! What an a priori mindset.

You think the existing framework in the biological sciences, i.e., natural selection and mutations currently detailed by Darwinian evolution, furnishes satisfactory answers in explaining the diversity of body plans observed in the fossil record since the Cambrian Explosion and up to those extant now?
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
I'll finish off this discussion by just posting an overall comment that summarize our discussion from my perspective, including this last post that I think is quite snarky, btw.

Sorry, I don't intentionally set out to be snarky, but sometimes it just sneaks out when I'm not looking.....
4fvgdaq_th.gif


In order for you general scenario vis-a-vis evolution and theistic creation to be the truth, what you have done was to formulate probably the single biggest conspiracy theory ever devised dealing with science. What you put forth would involve many thousands of research scientists all working to create a fictional story. Therefore, that would make them either ignorant, dishonest, or both-- probably the latter. If that somehow makes sense to you, hey, it's a free country.

You know that the Bible tells us about just such a conspiracy.....
There is a powerful entity whose influence is felt in this world without most people even being aware of it.
The world as it is today, with all of our technology and advancements, is degenerating into a cess pit of unrelenting violence, unimaginable cruelty and disgusting immorality, in an age where we should expect to see advancements in knowledge, intellectual appreciation and greater understanding of human behavior. Even my own unbelieving mother says 'its like some evil force is controlling the world'.
More and more people are feeling this way.....we know that because we talk to them every day in our evangelizing work.

The apostle John describes this "evil force" ....."We know that we originate with God, but the whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one." (1 John 5:19) This entity has the power to "blind minds" (2 Corinthians 4:3-4)....which means that the center that processes all information gathered by the senses is essentially disabled, no matter how intelligent a person purports to be. That explains why there is such a general acceptance of something so 'godless' when there is no real solid, verifiable evidence to support it.
It is sold to those who have sold out to 'the world'....the one Jesus told us to be "no part" of. (John 15:19)

While virtually stereotyping and essentially demeaning all these scientists, you then elevate a theistic belief system that virtually has no objective support to substantiate it. None. Nada. Nyet.

And that is what I have said all along Metis.....science has no more scientifically verifiable "evidence" than we do.
If you tell the real truth, there is "None. Nada. Nyet" in anything science presents to suggest a continuous chain of descent in all the creatures who have ever lived on this earth. All they have is supposition linking species to one another over millions of years. Is this "objective"? Or is evidence interpreted to agree with a pre-conceived idea? They can suggest that 'microbes evolved into dinosaurs' over millions of years, but how can anyone say that that is more believable than an Intelligent Creator? Science has no more "proof" of that being the case, than we can prove the existence of an all powerful Creator.

As impossible as it is for you to accept, one simply cannot provide one shred of objectively-derived evidence to indicate that there was one deity that fabricated our universe, inspired scriptures, and then will judge people after they die. If it could have been done, it would have been done, but no such evidence exists-- even though I sincerely wish it did.

Its all around you....open your eyes. Use your senses to see what God has beautifully designed.
If biomimetics is the science that tries to copy the marvelous designs in nature and it takes trained scientific brains to work out how to imitate nature...how come the original design needed no intelligence to create them in the first place? :shrug:

But what you also do is to defy common sense. What we see every day of the week is change, and material objects, including genes, change over time. Many changes are detrimental. and we know that, but they largely get weeded out through natural selection. Unfortunately some persist.

The change you see is confined to within a species. Adaptation continues to this day. But science has never once seen one species transition into another completely different kind of creature altogether. That is where evidence ends and fantasy begins.

If "God" created us all directly, then miscarriages and children borne with serious birth defects would logically indicate that he is one mean and nasty deity, going by your scenario. An unborn or newly borne baby cannot sin, so what kind of deity would punish him/her for that?

If you are going to argue from the Biblical aspect, then at least argue from what the Bible actually says.....it tells us exactly why we do not enjoy the perfection that our bodies suggest is possible. Why would you see miscarriage as a punishment? "Sin" simply means to be imperfect. We see evidence of that imperfection every day.
If Jesus said that "not even a bird falls to the ground without his Father's knowledge", how much more concerned is he with the death of a human....even an unborn human?

The potential for humans to keep living without aging or death is high on the agenda of many scientists. The "fountain of youth" is still as eagerly sought today as it ever was, though through different avenues. No one wants to die if they have a good quality of life. Science cannot explain why we die....they can tell us how, but not why the process of cell renewal fails to keep going. Theoretically it should last indefinitely.

Pain, suffering and death were never supposed to enter the realm of human experience but they did when humans walked away from their Creator....all are completely foreign and unacceptable to us. The Revelation tells us that all those things will be abolished under the rule of God's Kingdom. (Revelation 21:2-5) That is a hope I cherish.
128fs318181.gif


We only have to consider the talents of servants to understand that a pocket of pure genius can exist in human brains. An extraordinary capability is demonstrated in art, music or mathematics to an almost unimaginable degree......this is what humankind were meant to manifest....abilities that reflect the perfection achieved by the Creator in all that he does. We lost it in Eden, but we are promised that we will get it back...not in heaven, but right here on earth where the Creator put us in the first place.

However, I certainly do not go to the polar extreme of saying there cannot be a God or Gods, but I'm simply not willing to have a blind faith in this regard. I read the Bible daily as it provides inspiration to me and many others, but I also read other scriptures and also philosophies as well. Instead of how God is portrayed through the Abrahamic religions, I tend to drift more in the direction of Baruch Spinoza and Albert Einstein, namely that God is so integral with our universe as to be inseparable from it (sorta panetheistic/panentheistic/ deistic-- too beyond my pay-grade to lean more one way or the other). This puts me into "Whatever is, Is" camp. Can I prove this approach to be the correct one? No. Do I know it's the right one? No. It's a "leaning" that I have.

A spiritual "leaning" is programmed into all of us. But like a muscle, if spirituality is not fed or fostered, it will be overtaken by selfish pursuits and the latest 'leanings' of the world's fads and fashions. Evolution is a 'new kid on the block' relatively speaking.

I sympathize with your position because we should all be able to rest our hopes on something solid. It is unsettling to feel like you are in limbo, so to speak, unable to come to solid conclusions about these things.
balloony.gif


If this life is all there is, then what is the point of our existence? Animals are blissfully ignorant about their future as they live only in the moment.....we do not have that capacity....we alone can process concepts that animals simply do not have. We can consciously understand and calculate time....a past, present and future. We can use the past and the present knowledge that we have gained to plan our future. We alone have a consciousness of our own demise and the possible loss of loved ones. It causes us great distress. It feels entirely wrong...and the Bible explains why. What does evolution explain? Nothing.

In conclusion, the only thing that stops you from accepting the obvious, namely that there has been and still in an evolutionary process whereas new "kinds" eventually emerge along some lines, is an interpretation of a creation narrative that we know simply is not true, as it simply doesn't reflect what the overwhelming evidence is telling us, not only as scientists but also those who actually study theology in an objective manner. Instead of accepting both known scientific evidence and serious theology, you choose to reject both. But that's clearly your right.

In a world ruled by the devil, nothing is as it seems. His MO is deception and he is an expert at it. How many people know when they are being conned by an expert? Only when things end badly. How does the Bible explain that end? Now compare that with what evolution explains as that end......who do you hope is right? What will the majority choose if it means that they are nothing more than animals and can behave like them with no higher power to answer to? (Matthew 7:13-14)

Take care, and this concludes my part of the discussion.

Thank you Metis.....I know you find people like me frustrating....but you will never wear me down. I know what I believe and why I believe it. I know what foundation evolution is built on and I believe that it will collapse in a big way in the not too distant future.....but that is just my belief. We are all free to believe whatever we wish.....we just have the capacity to contemplate what will happen if our faith is misplaced. :( Evolutionists have way more to lose than we do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top