• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Just in: RNC votes to ban CNN and NBC from debates.

esmith

Veteran Member
It's a documentary on her life. I don't see it as NBC or CNN or Fox annotating Clinton as the democratic choice for president. Of course that's what the right will say (preibus).
All I see is that people are shaking in their boots at the notion she will be running and will try to halt ANYTHING talking about her. Regardless if a movie, documentary, etc. It's not like they're making a Hollywood moving about Obama prior to the 2012 election painting the world how it would look in 2016. Remember that sham of a movie that was filled with nonstop lies?
Esmith, I'd recommend you to stop watching right wing media and start living in the real world. They intentionally keep information from you on purpose.
If your comments weren't so outlandish I might take them seriously. Guess you really don't really listen to or read anything but the most left wing sources. Try these:

Chuck Todd: NBC should make a movie about John Edwards, not Hillary Clinton - The Hill's Twitter Room
NBC News' Chuck Todd Calls RNC 'Smart' for Hillary Clinton Debate Boycott (Video)
Chuck Todd: Hillary miniseries ‘a total nightmare for NBC News’
NBC News' Chuck Todd calls Hillary Clinton miniseries a 'nightmare' - latimes.com
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
Chuck Todd can have any opinion he wants. I can cherry pick specific people too. I'd bet more support the notion than not.

Please note that his main gripe with the documentary is that people will assume it's NBC news putting on the documentary and not the entertainment division of NBC.
 
Last edited:

esmith

Veteran Member
Chuck Todd can have any opinion he wants. I can cherry pick specific people too. I'd bet more support the notion than not.
Try this one.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...hillary-clinton-tv-projects-article-1.1420029

Please note that his main gripe with the documentary is that people will assume it's NBC news putting on the documentary and not the entertainment division of NBC.

Stop attempt to make excuses for your comment
" I'd recommend you to stop watching right wing media and start living in the real world."
Your assumptions are, how should I say, invalid. Maybe you should expand your reading and listing sources to those that do not always agree with your narrow view of your world.
 
Last edited:

Dirty Penguin

Master Of Ceremony
What is bothering me is where are those in the Democrat party that might object to NBC, and CNN annotating Clinton as the Democrats choice for President. The last time I checked I thought it was the primary's that determined who would be the choice. There are those that say that these miseries are basically just a business decision to bring in money, capitalism. It is well documented that NBC and to a lesser extent CNN has a decidedly liberal agenda. There are a few at NBC that think this is a bad idea for NBC, Chuck Todd being the most outspoken. If you were a Democrat and thought about running for President in 2016, VP Biden for one, this series is basically free advertising for Hillary.

It doesn't bother me that NBC/CNN want to present a biography of her but it sure does seem to bother the GOP for some reason. Shucks..let the networks speculate. She hasn't announced that she's even running (hoping she does - with fingers crossed...)().....
 

Reverend Rick

Frubal Whore
Premium Member
It doesn't bother me that NBC/CNN want to present a biography of her but it sure does seem to bother the GOP for some reason. Shucks..let the networks speculate. She hasn't announced that she's even running (hoping she does - with fingers crossed...)().....

Geeze, does it not bother you that two families have been in charge for 20 years prior to Obama? Do you really want it to be 24 or 28 years?

If Hillary is the best you got, the republicans have a chance next time.

Rand Paul baby!
 

tumbleweed41

Resident Liberal Hippie
Oh yeah!!

I would love for someone to do a full on news documentary of Rand Paul.
Or at least an expose to show he is about as Libertarian as my left big toe.
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
Geeze, does it not bother you that two families have been in charge for 20 years prior to Obama? Do you really want it to be 24 or 28 years?

If Hillary is the best you got, the republicans have a chance next time.

Rand Paul baby!
'Ayn' Rand Paul is getting crushed by Canadian Cruz. The GOP establishment will not allow a tea party member to gain the nomination.
 

Dirty Penguin

Master Of Ceremony
Geeze, does it not bother you that two families have been in charge for 20 years prior to Obama?

No. I am but one vote amongst millions. It's the people who elect their President. Not just me. If that's what the people want then they should have that. It's not like these Presidents ran unopposed. They ran against the opposite party and the people voted for their agenda...an agenda that obviously aligned with the populous.



Do you really want it to be 24 or 28 years?
It's not just about me. I want a candidate that best fits my values.

If Hillary is the best you got
She, IMHO, is a good candidate. There may be others

the republicans have a chance next time.
Heck to the NO!.....Your party, at this point, is out of touch with the people. They're social policies are tantamount to Sharia Law which is ironic how much they are against it but seem to emulate it. Your party is solely responsible for suppressing the vote and are hardly inclusive of all Americans...given their rhetoric and policies against women, minorities, the youth voter and the LGBT Community. There's an element of bigotry and racism that rears its head from time to time throughout your party. Now that the tea party is driving the train it's even worse.

Rand Paul baby!
He's a fake wannabe libertarian. He's no more small government than anyone else in that party. He has seemed to align himself with one or more overt racist characters and his state receives more in fed funds than they pay out. What's even worse are his policy positions. While it may appear that many like him (THE BASE)...that is not reflected across various demographics in America. Is he or Cruz (McCarthy lite!) the best you have?
 
Last edited:
Top