Kathleen Willey calls for Hillary to Resign from Campaign

[ShivaFan]

Kathleen Willey, former White House volunteer aide who states unequivocally she was sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton on November 29, 1993, during his first term as President, and who testified in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case, Jones who was sexually harassed by the husband of Hillary Clinton and who Hillary called a trailer trash bimbo and liar, Bill Clinton who had to pay to pay Jones $850,000 in settlement, today Willey on twitter called for Hillary to resign from her campaign for harassing victims of sexual assault and rape.

Quote:

“The Hag has called us bimbos, sluts, trailer trash, whores, skanks. From one woman to her rapist's victims. When will u resign from ur campaign?”

Today also, former registered nurse and women’s rights advocate Juanita Broaddrick who states unequivocally she was raped by Bill Clinton in April 1978 and who was threatened directly by Hillary Clinton to shut up about it, said today on Twitter:

Quote:

“Hillary calls Trump's remarks 'horrific' while she lives with and protects a Rapist. Her actions are horrific.”
“I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me.”

Paula Jones then added in:

Quote:

“Bill was getting his wee wee sucked under the Oval Office desk and still won a second term, UNBELIEVABLE!”

 

[Sunstone]

This wouldn't happen to be your tepid response to the now dozen or so Republican politicians who have, within just one day of the Open Mic Video, called upon Trump to resign, would it?

 

[ShivaFan]

This wouldn't happen to be your tepid response to the now dozen or so Republican politicians who have, within just one day of the Open Mic Video, called upon Trump to resign, would it?

How lame. These are Republican Establishment cheap labor elitists who attacked Trump from day one and are part of this coordinated CLINTON-BUSH, BUSH-CLINTON effort of the NeverTrump'ers who are hated by the base. No one cares what they say, everyone hates them. What Paul Ryan has to fear is being thrown out by the anti-establishment wave.

1. And what does some banter Trump said 11 years ago have to do with the Republican base at all? TRUMP WAS A DEMOCRAT FROM 1992 to 2008, he was just your typical Democrat in 2005 when he said this (frankly, typical male banter and actually very apropos of the time, very Democratic Party which was all cheers for Billy Clinton's sexual assaults on women). So this is a DEMOCRATIC PARTY PROBLEM so TYPICAL OF THE CLINTON ERA.
2. You Democrats SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THE PARTY AND THE CLINTON'S WHO SPIRITED THIS TYPE OF BANTER AND TALK AT THE TIME!

 

[freethinker44]

Just brainstorming here, but have they tried to "grab her by the *****"?
I've heard that works.

 

[tytlyf]

People seem to forget that Bill isn't running for president.

 

[Sunstone]

How lame.

Great comeback! By the way, since I last posted in this thread, the number of prominent Republican politicians who have either declared they will not vote for Trump, or who have called on Trump to withdraw from the race, has more then doubled. I'll try to keep you updated as the movement grows. You're welcome.

 

[idav]

Kathleen Willey, former White House volunteer aide who states unequivocally she was sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton on November 29, 1993, during his first term as President, and who testified in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case, Jones who was sexually harassed by the husband of Hillary Clinton and who Hillary called a trailer trash bimbo and liar, Bill Clinton who had to pay to pay Jones $850,000 in settlement, today Willey on twitter called for Hillary to resign from her campaign for harassing victims of sexual assault and rape.

Quote:

“The Hag has called us bimbos, sluts, trailer trash, whores, skanks. From one woman to her rapist's victims. When will u resign from ur campaign?”

Today also, former registered nurse and women’s rights advocate Juanita Broaddrick who states unequivocally she was raped by Bill Clinton in April 1978 and who was threatened directly by Hillary Clinton to shut up about it, said today on Twitter:

Quote:

“Hillary calls Trump's remarks 'horrific' while she lives with and protects a Rapist. Her actions are horrific.”
“I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me.”

Paula Jones then added in:

Quote:

“Bill was getting his wee wee sucked under the Oval Office desk and still won a second term, UNBELIEVABLE!”

As far as I can tell there, Hillary was a victim of Bill. Thats how it sounds when a wife calls an alleged mistress a liar and being accused of "living with a rapist".

However Trump says he doesn't want to win on "Bill Clinton's past", but only time will tell.

Lets be real though, I'm sure the correct thing to do is blame a criminals wife for all wrong doing.

 

[Revoltingest]

People seem to forget that Bill isn't running for president.

This is true.
But Hillary did have a role in dismissing & disparaging the women Bill attacked.
This makes her complicit in his assaults.
Neither candidate has clean hands regarding treatment of women.

And to head off the perfunctory response of "false equivalency",
I'll say that Hillary is the worse of the two.

 

[McBell]

Kathleen Willey, former White House volunteer aide who states unequivocally she was sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton on November 29, 1993, during his first term as President, and who testified in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case, Jones who was sexually harassed by the husband of Hillary Clinton and who Hillary called a trailer trash bimbo and liar, Bill Clinton who had to pay to pay Jones $850,000 in settlement, today Willey on twitter called for Hillary to resign from her campaign for harassing victims of sexual assault and rape.

Quote:

“The Hag has called us bimbos, sluts, trailer trash, whores, skanks. From one woman to her rapist's victims. When will u resign from ur campaign?”

Today also, former registered nurse and women’s rights advocate Juanita Broaddrick who states unequivocally she was raped by Bill Clinton in April 1978 and who was threatened directly by Hillary Clinton to shut up about it, said today on Twitter:

Quote:

“Hillary calls Trump's remarks 'horrific' while she lives with and protects a Rapist. Her actions are horrific.”
“I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me.”

Paula Jones then added in:

Quote:

“Bill was getting his wee wee sucked under the Oval Office desk and still won a second term, UNBELIEVABLE!”

Perhaps you can present the date Bill was prosecuted for this alleged rape?

 

[Wirey]

Perhaps you can present the date Bill was prosecuted for this alleged rape?

Unfair. I'd say it's safe to surmise that Bill diddled a few on the side. Guys like that don't pick a couple and then give up.

However, the final report of the US Office of the Independent Counsel on the matter included the statement:

"Willey gave false information to the FBI about her sexual relationship with a former boyfriend, and acknowledged having lied about it when the agents confronted her with contradictory evidence. There were also some differences in her Paula Jones and Grand Jury testimony."

She was a liar who actually conspired with Linda Tripp to attempt to get Clinton to sleep with her (don't take my word for it, look it up). Bill is a sleaze bag, but this woman makes him look pretty good.

 

[McBell]

Unfair.

ROTFLMAO

 

[Acim]

Perhaps you can present the date Bill was prosecuted for this alleged rape?

Why would this matter?

 

[McBell]

Why would this matter?

To see if he was actually convicted or if it is a case of slander.

 

[Acim]

To see if he was actually convicted or if it is a case of slander.

So, if not convicted, then (likely) slander?
I think that's possible, but is that really the either-or, that is applicable here?

To me, the main take away from this thread is that women, who felt they were attacked by Hillary are calling for her to resign from the campaign.

But I do think if the rationale calling for that resignation is based on things not exactly proven or not exactly well reasoned, makes for questioning why anyone ought to pay attention to this call. Or how I filter all those people calling for Trump's resignation. I'd challenge most of them, but given their likelihood to play the emotional card and facts/allegations of their own wrongdoing be damned, it would probably be me (or anyone) not making much headway. Thus, all we have right now is people calling for resignations in a somewhat orchestrated dog and pony show.

 

[McBell]

So, if not convicted, then (likely) slander?
I think that's possible, but is that really the either-or, that is applicable here?

To me, the main take away from this thread is that women, who felt they were attacked by Hillary are calling for her to resign from the campaign.

But I do think if the rationale calling for that resignation is based on things not exactly proven or not exactly well reasoned, makes for questioning why anyone ought to pay attention to this call. Or how I filter all those people calling for Trump's resignation. I'd challenge most of them, but given their likelihood to play the emotional card and facts/allegations of their own wrongdoing be damned, it would probably be me (or anyone) not making much headway. Thus, all we have right now is people calling for resignations in a somewhat orchestrated dog and pony show.

You worded it a hell of a lot better than I can.

 

[idav]

But I do think if the rationale calling for that resignation is based on things not exactly proven or not exactly well reasoned, makes for questioning why anyone ought to pay attention to this call. Or how I filter all those people calling for Trump's resignation. I'd challenge most of them, but given their likelihood to play the emotional card and facts/allegations of their own wrongdoing be damned, it would probably be me (or anyone) not making much headway. Thus, all we have right now is people calling for resignations in a somewhat orchestrated dog and pony show.

Perhaps but there is a huge difference in someone calling resignations for things there family allegedly did vs things the actual candidate allegedly did. Dog and Pony show aside, Trump really stooped to some new lows bringing victims to the political debate. Don't you think the left would be as much in an uproar if there were anything heinous enough to call Hillary out? Don't you think the uproar would be a lot softer from the right if the remarks and allegations were less heinous in peoples views? The public called to crucify Billy boy for being involved with Trumps remarks scandal and that was over him calling someone "hot" and saying something to the affect that Trump "scored". My real question is why not the same witch hunt that went on for Billy Bush?

 

[Acim]

Don't you think the left would be as much in an uproar if there were anything heinous enough to call Hillary out?

I think there is already plenty of heinous enough items from LW perspective - i.e. WiliLeaks showing what Bernie said during primaries about Hillary was accurate, and the fact that the leaks reference something that had Hillary followed through and released transcripts on her own, would plausibly lead to Bernie winning.

So, not 100% I understand the phrasing of the question, but I don't think a partisan perspective would allow for one to be in an uproar, regardless of how heinous the action/words are.

Don't you think the uproar would be a lot softer from the right if the remarks and allegations were less heinous in peoples views?

I think my answer to this question is yes.

The public called to crucify Billy boy for being involved with Trumps remarks scandal and that was over him calling someone "hot" and saying something to the affect that Trump "scored". My real question is why not the same witch hunt that went on for Billy Bush?

I think Billy Bush is getting off (no pun intended) about 1000 times easier than Trump right now. Just like Huma Abedin is getting off far easier with allegations of wrong doing than what Hillary currently faces. Though comparing Huma to Billy isn't really fair, just saying that associates can pretty much remain on the sidelines, and possibly lose their current positions, but those are considered peanuts compared to what Hillary and Trump are going after.

 

[Willamena]

People seem to forget that Bill isn't running for president.

Just so. Wrong Clinton.

 

[idav]

So, not 100% I understand the phrasing of the question, but I don't think a partisan perspective would allow for one to be in an uproar, regardless of how heinous the action/words are.



I think my answer to this question is yes.

These couple of points do not match. I might believe the first answer if Republicans remained silent on Trumps issues. It cannot be because public opinion will always be an issue throughout their political careers.

Which is why showing the uproar of women on Billy Bush is fascinating compared to the uproar against Trumps much more lewd remarks.

 

[Acim]

These couple of points do not match.

Maybe cause the questions don't match?

I might believe the first answer if Republicans remained silent on Trumps issues. It cannot be because public opinion will always be an issue throughout their political careers.

Which is why showing the uproar of women on Billy Bush is fascinating compared to the uproar against Trumps much more lewd remarks.

I'm barely aware of the 'uproar' on Billy Bush. Care to explain that? Even while it has arguably nothing to do with this thread.