• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Kevin McCarthy Threatens Impeachment For Merrick Garland Over Hunter Biden

We Never Know

No Slack
Kevin has been busy lately....

Kevin McCarthy Threatens Impeachment For Merrick Garland Over Hunter Biden

WASHINGTON ― Republicans in the House of Representatives could impeach Attorney General Merrick Garland over an allegation that the Justice Department stifled criminal charges against Hunter Biden.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said Sunday the allegation would be “a significant part” of an impeachment inquiry if an IRS whistleblower’s claims pan out.

Federal prosecutors in Delaware announced charges last week against President Joe Biden’s son for failing to pay taxes in 2017 and 2018. Hunter Biden agreed to plead guilty.

But Gary Shapley, an IRS agent who oversaw a criminal investigation into the president’s son’s taxes, said in congressional testimony revealed last week that Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss claimed he couldn’t charge Hunter Biden outside of Delaware. This would contradict statements from Garland.

We need to get to the facts, and that includes reconciling these clear disparities,” McCarthy said Sunday on Twitter. “U.S. Attorney David Weiss must provide answers to the House Judiciary Committee. If the whistleblowers’ allegations are true, this will be a significant part of a larger impeachment inquiry into Merrick Garland’s weaponization of DOJ.”

The supposed “weaponization” of the Justice Department has been a top talking point for House Republicans backing former President Donald Trump’s “witch hunt” grievance against federal law enforcement. Trump, who is currently running for president, was indicted this month for obstruction of justice and other federal charges related to his hoarding of classified documents after leaving the White House.

The fact that Hunter Biden was also indicted only made Republicans more adamant that Trump is being mistreated. Republicans characterized the charges against Biden as a slap on the wrist, though former prosecutors have said otherwise.

Shapley claimed that Weiss said in an October meeting that he couldn’t bring charges against Biden in Washington, D.C., without approval from the U.S. attorney there. Shapley’s testimony took place in May, but House Republicans made it public after Weiss announced a plea deal with Biden. On Saturday, Shapley’s attorneys released a statement naming other people who he said witnessed the conversation.

Weiss told lawmakers in a letter earlier this month that he had “ultimate authority” to file charges whenever and wherever he wanted. And Garland said Friday that Weiss had “complete authority to make all decisions on his own.

A spokesman for the Justice Department declined to comment on Monday.

Far-right lawmakers in the House have been itching to impeach the president and various cabinet officials, including Garland. McCarthy persuaded them to back off a snap impeachment of Biden last week; he could throw them a bone by backing an impeachment inquiry against Garland.

It would be up to the Democratic-controlled Senate whether impeachments would result in officials being removed from office."

 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Kevin has been busy lately....

Kevin McCarthy Threatens Impeachment For Merrick Garland Over Hunter Biden

WASHINGTON ― Republicans in the House of Representatives could impeach Attorney General Merrick Garland over an allegation that the Justice Department stifled criminal charges against Hunter Biden.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said Sunday the allegation would be “a significant part” of an impeachment inquiry if an IRS whistleblower’s claims pan out.

Federal prosecutors in Delaware announced charges last week against President Joe Biden’s son for failing to pay taxes in 2017 and 2018. Hunter Biden agreed to plead guilty.

But Gary Shapley, an IRS agent who oversaw a criminal investigation into the president’s son’s taxes, said in congressional testimony revealed last week that Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss claimed he couldn’t charge Hunter Biden outside of Delaware. This would contradict statements from Garland.

We need to get to the facts, and that includes reconciling these clear disparities,” McCarthy said Sunday on Twitter. “U.S. Attorney David Weiss must provide answers to the House Judiciary Committee. If the whistleblowers’ allegations are true, this will be a significant part of a larger impeachment inquiry into Merrick Garland’s weaponization of DOJ.”

The supposed “weaponization” of the Justice Department has been a top talking point for House Republicans backing former President Donald Trump’s “witch hunt” grievance against federal law enforcement. Trump, who is currently running for president, was indicted this month for obstruction of justice and other federal charges related to his hoarding of classified documents after leaving the White House.

The fact that Hunter Biden was also indicted only made Republicans more adamant that Trump is being mistreated. Republicans characterized the charges against Biden as a slap on the wrist, though former prosecutors have said otherwise.

Shapley claimed that Weiss said in an October meeting that he couldn’t bring charges against Biden in Washington, D.C., without approval from the U.S. attorney there. Shapley’s testimony took place in May, but House Republicans made it public after Weiss announced a plea deal with Biden. On Saturday, Shapley’s attorneys released a statement naming other people who he said witnessed the conversation.

Weiss told lawmakers in a letter earlier this month that he had “ultimate authority” to file charges whenever and wherever he wanted. And Garland said Friday that Weiss had “complete authority to make all decisions on his own.

A spokesman for the Justice Department declined to comment on Monday.

Far-right lawmakers in the House have been itching to impeach the president and various cabinet officials, including Garland. McCarthy persuaded them to back off a snap impeachment of Biden last week; he could throw them a bone by backing an impeachment inquiry against Garland.

It would be up to the Democratic-controlled Senate whether impeachments would result in officials being removed from office."

I'll believe it if and when it happens.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Kevin has been busy lately....

Kevin McCarthy Threatens Impeachment For Merrick Garland Over Hunter Biden

WASHINGTON ― Republicans in the House of Representatives could impeach Attorney General Merrick Garland over an allegation that the Justice Department stifled criminal charges against Hunter Biden.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said Sunday the allegation would be “a significant part” of an impeachment inquiry if an IRS whistleblower’s claims pan out.

Federal prosecutors in Delaware announced charges last week against President Joe Biden’s son for failing to pay taxes in 2017 and 2018. Hunter Biden agreed to plead guilty.

But Gary Shapley, an IRS agent who oversaw a criminal investigation into the president’s son’s taxes, said in congressional testimony revealed last week that Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss claimed he couldn’t charge Hunter Biden outside of Delaware. This would contradict statements from Garland.

We need to get to the facts, and that includes reconciling these clear disparities,” McCarthy said Sunday on Twitter. “U.S. Attorney David Weiss must provide answers to the House Judiciary Committee. If the whistleblowers’ allegations are true, this will be a significant part of a larger impeachment inquiry into Merrick Garland’s weaponization of DOJ.”

The supposed “weaponization” of the Justice Department has been a top talking point for House Republicans backing former President Donald Trump’s “witch hunt” grievance against federal law enforcement. Trump, who is currently running for president, was indicted this month for obstruction of justice and other federal charges related to his hoarding of classified documents after leaving the White House.

The fact that Hunter Biden was also indicted only made Republicans more adamant that Trump is being mistreated. Republicans characterized the charges against Biden as a slap on the wrist, though former prosecutors have said otherwise.

Shapley claimed that Weiss said in an October meeting that he couldn’t bring charges against Biden in Washington, D.C., without approval from the U.S. attorney there. Shapley’s testimony took place in May, but House Republicans made it public after Weiss announced a plea deal with Biden. On Saturday, Shapley’s attorneys released a statement naming other people who he said witnessed the conversation.

Weiss told lawmakers in a letter earlier this month that he had “ultimate authority” to file charges whenever and wherever he wanted. And Garland said Friday that Weiss had “complete authority to make all decisions on his own.

A spokesman for the Justice Department declined to comment on Monday.

Far-right lawmakers in the House have been itching to impeach the president and various cabinet officials, including Garland. McCarthy persuaded them to back off a snap impeachment of Biden last week; he could throw them a bone by backing an impeachment inquiry against Garland.

It would be up to the Democratic-controlled Senate whether impeachments would result in officials being removed from office."

No surprise as there's no low that McCarthy seems willing to avoid so as to keep his job as Speaker.

Also, what's so "funny" is that so many on the right ridiculed those who wanted to defund the police but now some of them want to defund the FBI and DoJ.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
Hmmmm, why was Adam Schiff censured?
Oh that's right "As chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff launched an all-out political campaign built on baseless distortions against a sitting U.S. president, at the expense of every single citizen in this country and the honor of the House of Representatives," Luna said before the vote. "With access to sensitive information unavailable to most members of Congress and certainly not accessible to the American people, Schiff abused his privileges, claiming to know the truth while leaving Americans in the dark about his web of lies… lies so severe that they altered the course of the country forever."
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Hmmmm, why was Adam Schiff censured?
Oh that's right "As chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff launched an all-out political campaign built on baseless distortions against a sitting U.S. president, at the expense of every single citizen in this country and the honor of the House of Representatives," Luna said before the vote. "With access to sensitive information unavailable to most members of Congress and certainly not accessible to the American people, Schiff abused his privileges, claiming to know the truth while leaving Americans in the dark about his web of lies… lies so severe that they altered the course of the country forever."
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
Hmmmm, why was Adam Schiff censured?
Oh that's right "As chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff launched an all-out political campaign built on baseless distortions against a sitting U.S. president, at the expense of every single citizen in this country and the honor of the House of Representatives," Luna said before the vote. "With access to sensitive information unavailable to most members of Congress and certainly not accessible to the American people, Schiff abused his privileges, claiming to know the truth while leaving Americans in the dark about his web of lies… lies so severe that they altered the course of the country forever."

Adam Schiff was censored because he dared to question the godhood of trump (in the MAGA mind). To some on the right, politics trumps honor, truth, justice and all other virtues.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
You know, it's almost like Dems have never heard the expression "What goes around, comes around." Have I just imagine the last 7 years of "Get Trump -- at any cost"? Did you not think that payback might be on the dinner menu? Or is it hunky dory when the Dems are leading the salivating pack?
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
You know, it's almost like Dems have never heard the expression "What goes around, comes around." Have I just imagine the last 7 years of "Get Trump -- at any cost"? Did you not think that payback might be on the dinner menu? Or is it hunky dory when the Dems are leading the salivating pack?
The difference is in the scale and legitimacy.
So, what's the lesson, then? Should we not hold people accountable for their incompetence, corruption, misconduct, etc.?
 

Whateverist

Active Member
You know, it's almost like Dems have never heard the expression "What goes around, comes around." Have I just imagine the last 7 years of "Get Trump -- at any cost"? Did you not think that payback might be on the dinner menu? Or is it hunky dory when the Dems are leading the salivating pack?

Gettin Trump is what justice looks like when someone has broken as many laws as Dumpy.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
The difference is in the scale and legitimacy.
So, what's the lesson, then? Should we not hold people accountable for their incompetence, corruption, misconduct, etc.?
Not at all. Just don't scream when the poo comes in your direction.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Gettin Trump is what justice looks like when someone has broken as many laws as Dumpy.
Dumpy? This Trump hatred is so bloody juvenille. So, you are good with weaponizing the justice system to get people? Oh, what a spiffy world you will get with that kind of thinking.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
In other words people should be discouraged from reporting crimes or pursuing justice due to potential retaliation?
I'm not saying that at all. Again, with all the massive blowback against Trump over the last several years did you really think there was not going to be any kind of payback? Seriously?
 
Top