Well, you can see my results on the other threads, however, since you posted the spekd one, my result came out as libertarian socialist. Economic -59, Social -55. I'm not surprised at all. I very much respect individual rights but on an economical level I think things need to be regulated.
I could be wrong, of course, on the economics at least. I don't think there's anything good that comes out of stifling individual rights though. The only things I can think of is that it depends on what one means by not infringing on others' rights, because it's not as clear of a line as a lot of people think. Take climate change... It's your individual right to drive the car you want, but what if most people drive heavily polluting ones? Then that causes lots of problems for people who do not want pollution and for future generations.
So it depends on definitions and how you see things. I personally think it could count as an infringement on someone else's right (to life, to health, etc.), but I'm sure one could disagree, however I don't know how one would defend that position. I think you would need to weigh things out. I mean, the car scenario is the right to chose a heavy polluting vehicle and it's mostly an aesthetic and personal preference. The other is the right of life, health and future generations being in the balance. I don't know about you but the latter seems more important to me.
