• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Lack of belief in gods.

Jeremiahcp

Well-Known Jerk
I wouldn't know.


That they invest in their spouses opinion that they shouldn't smoke is to be against smoking.

I'm never, in my life, going to defend the right of infants or innocents to smoke.

" That they invest in their spouses opinion that they shouldn't smoke is to be against smoking."

Semantics.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
wishful thinking set aside......

atheism has a definition.....
anyone care to twist it a bit more?
 

Jeremiahcp

Well-Known Jerk
just wait for it

life is short

Well then you don't have supporting evidence for your hypothesis; and if evidence can not be given then you have an unfalsifiable claim.

You see how that works? I made no statement at all about if your claim was true or not.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Well then you don't have supporting evidence for your hypothesis; and if evidence can not be given then you have an unfalsifiable claim.

You see how that works? I made no statement at all about if your claim was true or not.
cause and effect.....

the universe (one word) is the effect

God is the cause
 

Jeremiahcp

Well-Known Jerk
so much for science....science relies on it

it is a constant......no denial allowed

Science does not rely on cause and effect. Science relies on the scientific method.

Now own up to your claim that God is the cause. What you are doing now is called a straw man argument. Cause and effect does not prove that God is the cause.
 
Last edited:
Top