ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
As long as you don't define 'spirit', the question is devoid of meaning.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Lack of belief in gods.
- Thread starter Jeremiahcp
- Start date
No, I didn't. I didn't ask for any sort of proof. You were the one who said that there is no proof for God; that's what started this whole thing.
So you think there is proof for God now?
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Chaos is now a science....and there is order in it
and all motion is the remnant of the that initial 'bang"
Cephus
Relentlessly Rational
Whichever one is most convenient at the time, of course.
Burning food is now cooking, too.
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
Bwahaha.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
and with that post.....666.....you might burn as well
substance first?
or Spirit?
anyone dare?
Thief
Rogue Theologian
time does not exist....except for now
not a substance or a force
how about you?
substance first?
or Spirit?
Both, and neither.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
An interesting thread-- so long as you skip over of the nonsensical posts (hint: the ones without any punctuation), and just read the rebuttals.
I have nothing more to add, except that I'd say that the nontheists are clearly ahead by several points-- if anyone was keeping score (I quit several pages back... zero to whatever is still a zero).
I did find it interesting the degree of patience as exhibited by most of the posters herein. I'd have given up long ago at the continued refusal to answer a single coherent question (mr no-punctuation).
But I learned a thing or three about others that I admired, which was welcome. Even one Theist-- which was even more welcome!
Cheers! and R'Amen too!
I have nothing more to add, except that I'd say that the nontheists are clearly ahead by several points-- if anyone was keeping score (I quit several pages back... zero to whatever is still a zero).
I did find it interesting the degree of patience as exhibited by most of the posters herein. I'd have given up long ago at the continued refusal to answer a single coherent question (mr no-punctuation).
But I learned a thing or three about others that I admired, which was welcome. Even one Theist-- which was even more welcome!
Cheers! and R'Amen too!
leibowde84
Veteran Member
What if the universe is infinite and eternal, meaning that it is in a constant expansion/contraction cycle? Although we don't know for sure whether the universe had a beginning or not, it is certainly possible that it did not. So, if we do find proof for an eternal universe, would your belief change?
leibowde84
Veteran Member
Lol ... Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
the motion indicates a starting 'point'
the motion indicates expansion into darkness
a beginning
an end