Thumper
Thank the gods I'm an atheist
Not an answer to my question.Yes, there are lots of different ways to doubt. Philosophy is beautiful in that it can approach anything, tear it apart, and put it back together.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Not an answer to my question.Yes, there are lots of different ways to doubt. Philosophy is beautiful in that it can approach anything, tear it apart, and put it back together.
I view philosophy and religion as separate. Religion = theology while philosophy is neutral.As a philosophy enthusiast myself I recognize that it too has limits. Like religion its overly abstract and subjective, and, just as it is with religion, because of this it has limits when dealing with the objective world. Which is why we have science.
I said yes.Not an answer to my question.
By the etymology we are discussing a belief. Specifically a not-god belief. We are not discussing a not-belief in god.Not-god. Exactly.
No god for the antitheist, nor for the infant. God must be adopted consciously, all else is not-god.
So you agree you can define god?"You can entertain that of someone who does not believe that the proposition god exists is true and doesn't believe the proposition god does not exist is true. "
More nonsense I see. . . .
"Does god exist?"
Let me put on some of my many hats for you:
God exist
God does not exist
I am undecided if God exist
God may or may not exist.
Some Gods exist and some don't.
I don't care one way or another.
There are so many variation, and I am sorry if you are simply not cable of such mental flexibility.
I view philosophy and religion as separate. Religion = theology while philosophy is neutral.
So you agree you can define god?
Okay, how do you approach Philosophy?I never said they were the same thing. They are just similar in many respects.
Yes, but you have a definition for god. You do not hold that god can not be defined is true.I could define gods in many ways.
Watch:
God is a giant turkey!
Okay, how do you approach Philosophy?
Yes, but you have a definition for god. You do not hold that god can not be defined is true.
So how is human wisdom limited when we can investigate anything for ourselves and come to our own conclusions?More often religion is based on the assumption of transcendent wisdom. While more often philosophy is based on human wisdom.
Apparently you think God is a turkey. Which means that the conversation regarding gods existence is something that we would have to modify in order to have a discussion. I certainly agree turkeys exist, and I agree some could be called giant. I do not think a turkey is a god or a god is a turkey. So, there is the disconnect.I could define gods in many ways.
Watch:
God is a giant turkey!
Now from that please tell me what my beliefs about gods actually are.
In order to have any of those positions except for "I don't know..." then you would need to be able to define god.You really have no clue what my actual position on this god deal is.
God is a toaster!
Maybe you should stop assuming you can read minds.
So how is human wisdom limited when we can investigate anything for ourselves and come to our own conclusions?
In order to have any of those positions except for "I don't know..." then you would need to be able to define god.
Apparently you think God is a turkey. Which means that the conversation regarding gods existence is something that we would have to modify in order to have a discussion. I certainly agree turkeys exist, and I agree some could be called giant. I do not think a turkey is a god or a god is a turkey. So, there is the disconnect.
You really have no clue what my actual position on this god deal is.
God is a toaster!
Maybe you should stop assuming you can read minds.
Is anyone else in this thread a participant in this discussion you think you're having?
I know it's not perfect, but I do think it's a big step away from religion. The only time when it's abstract and subjective is when it has no connection to the physical world. Fideism is hard to understand because it's like air, you just hope it's there as opposed to earthy, organic philosophy.Oh human wisdom is very limited in the fact it can be incomplete and wrong. Remember I said, "its overly abstract and subjective", and I have found that one of the most common errors in philosophy is the assumption that a rationally sound conclusion must be true. Too often philosophers do not take that extra step from hypothesizing to actually proving their position scientifically.
I know it's not perfect, but I do think it's a big step away from religion. The only time when it's abstract and subjective is when it has no connection to the physical world. Fideism is hard to understand because it's like air, you just hope it's there as opposed to earthy, organic philosophy.