• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Lack of belief in gods.

RedDragon94

Love everyone, meditate often
As a philosophy enthusiast myself I recognize that it too has limits. Like religion its overly abstract and subjective, and, just as it is with religion, because of this it has limits when dealing with the objective world. Which is why we have science.
I view philosophy and religion as separate. Religion = theology while philosophy is neutral.
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
"You can entertain that of someone who does not believe that the proposition god exists is true and doesn't believe the proposition god does not exist is true. "

More nonsense I see. . . .

"Does god exist?"

Let me put on some of my many hats for you:

God exist

God does not exist

I am undecided if God exist

God may or may not exist.

Some Gods exist and some don't.

I don't care one way or another.

There are so many variation, and I am sorry if you are simply not cable of such mental flexibility.

quote-it-is-the-mark-of-an-educated-mind-to-be-able-to-entertain-a-thought-without-accepting-it-aristotle-6779.jpg
So you agree you can define god?
 

RedDragon94

Love everyone, meditate often
More often religion is based on the assumption of transcendent wisdom. While more often philosophy is based on human wisdom.
So how is human wisdom limited when we can investigate anything for ourselves and come to our own conclusions?
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
I could define gods in many ways.

Watch:

God is a giant turkey!

Now from that please tell me what my beliefs about gods actually are.
Apparently you think God is a turkey. Which means that the conversation regarding gods existence is something that we would have to modify in order to have a discussion. I certainly agree turkeys exist, and I agree some could be called giant. I do not think a turkey is a god or a god is a turkey. So, there is the disconnect.
 

Jeremiahcp

Well-Known Jerk
So how is human wisdom limited when we can investigate anything for ourselves and come to our own conclusions?

Oh human wisdom is very limited in the fact it can be incomplete and wrong. Remember I said, "it's overly abstract and subjective", and I have found that one of the most common errors in philosophy is the assumption that a rationally sound conclusion must be true. Too often philosophers do not take that extra step from hypothesizing to actually proving their position scientifically.
 

Jeremiahcp

Well-Known Jerk
Apparently you think God is a turkey. Which means that the conversation regarding gods existence is something that we would have to modify in order to have a discussion. I certainly agree turkeys exist, and I agree some could be called giant. I do not think a turkey is a god or a god is a turkey. So, there is the disconnect.

I clearly said God was a toaster:

You really have no clue what my actual position on this god deal is.

God is a toaster!

Maybe you should stop assuming you can read minds.
 

RedDragon94

Love everyone, meditate often
Oh human wisdom is very limited in the fact it can be incomplete and wrong. Remember I said, "its overly abstract and subjective", and I have found that one of the most common errors in philosophy is the assumption that a rationally sound conclusion must be true. Too often philosophers do not take that extra step from hypothesizing to actually proving their position scientifically.
I know it's not perfect, but I do think it's a big step away from religion. The only time when it's abstract and subjective is when it has no connection to the physical world. Fideism is hard to understand because it's like air, you just hope it's there as opposed to earthy, organic philosophy.
 

Jeremiahcp

Well-Known Jerk
I know it's not perfect, but I do think it's a big step away from religion. The only time when it's abstract and subjective is when it has no connection to the physical world. Fideism is hard to understand because it's like air, you just hope it's there as opposed to earthy, organic philosophy.

I agree it is a big improvement over religion, but it is even better when joined with science. Science is after all the brain child of philosophy, and I consider them two halves of a whole.
 
Top