• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Las Vegas Shooting

MrMrdevincamus

Voice Of The Martyrs Supporter
NO!

Look at the death rates by gun in the UK and compare it to the US.
In UK it is 0.23; in US it 10.54
Guns per 100 people in UK is 6.6
Guns per 100 people in US is 112.6

It is not a coincidence!!

You must count murder by other means. The stated goal of Gun control advocates is to reduce deaths. That is like switching seats on the titanic.

; {>
 

MrMrdevincamus

Voice Of The Martyrs Supporter
A tiny bit off topic but one thing I was wondering is how in the heck did he get all those weapons and ammo up to his 32nd floor room without alerting the hotel staff that something weird was a foot? Wouldn't have all the gear weighed a ton? (Sorry, I'm not a gun owner and have never fired a gun, though I did hold one for about 15 seconds when I was about 10 years old.)

Its not difficult to get stuff into a motel room. Modern firearms break down, including machine guns. A guy could carry a LOT of firearms in using those suit covers and standard luggage
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Well no one saw airplanes being used as a weapon until 9-11. What if that guy had decided to load his Cessna or gulfstream up with fuel and crash that into the crowd? Or if he didn't own an airplane the same guy could have made a simple launcher and lobbed one to five gallon (napalm) gas cans into such a crowd, horrific and more effective. The point is the guy was dedicated. The ban the guns claims of gun control advocates fails.
That is sort of how this strikes me. No pun intended, believe me.
He was at this for over an hour? Surely there would have been complaints from nearby tenants about the noise prior to the smoke detectors going off? Where was the hotel staff and the police response? Again, I'm not a gun enthusiast, so I don't know about this sort of stuff.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Its not difficult to get stuff into a motel room. Modern firearms break down, including machine guns. A guy could carry a LOT of firearms in using those suit covers and standard luggage
So, premeditation on steroids. I was reading two firearms experts yesterday and they opined that due to the number of weapons this could not have been a psychotic break due to the level of planning necessary. I can't even image the sea of shell casings on the floor/carpet.
 

MohammadPali

Active Member
This guy could have invaded poland. Why isn't america ready to repeal the 2nd amendment ? Are we still fighting the British ? You don't even need a full repeal, just have small weapons, you don't need an ak47 or a ar-15 even if its a very low powered gun. Stop with the gun culture bs. Repeal it. Carry bow and arrows, go find another hobby. Guns should be with law enforcement. Why the hell are people carrying SCAR-L or a m249 machine gun with the bi-pod ? We don't need the guns, leave the guns at the range.
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
You must count murder by other means. The stated goal of Gun control advocates is to reduce deaths. That is like switching seats on the titanic.

; {>
You called me out last time but I was talking about gun deaths. Now because I've shown I was correct you move the goal posts.
It is not like switching seats on the Titanic. Very poor analogy.
If the population has more than one gun per person (as the US does), guns are available, guns are handy, guns are easily obtained, guns have little control...then when someone decides to go on the rampage it is easy to obtain the armoury required.

Your argument appears to be, if they can't use guns they will use knives/explosives/drowning/etc.
You called me out for evidence, what evidence do you have for that assumption?
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Just saw a pic of the perp's house & neighborhood.
Green lawns.....green trees....looks like Indiana.
This Nevada, people!
Why on Earth are they wasting water to remake a desert into the midwest?

That would explain why Lake Mead is drying up so fast.
 

McBell

Unbound
Did you hear the tape? I have heard that sound many times. You can not pull a trigger that fast. I estimated with a watch and counted. Then I multiplied it X 30 after timing and counting the pops for 2sec. It came out to 766 rounds per min. That is what a full auto M-16 or a SAW shoots (more or less, a saw was after my time so I may be off on the rpm). .....(that rate of fire is for a M-16A1 early version)... An AR-15 is easily modified to full auto, just by replacing the sear pin. (everyone in the firearm community knows this so I am telling no secrets here)

: {>
So mere speculation on your part?
 

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Did you hear the tape? I have heard that sound many times. You can not pull a trigger that fast. I estimated with a watch and counted. Then I multiplied it X 30 after timing and counting the pops for 2sec. It came out to 766 rounds per min. That is what a full auto M-16 or a SAW shoots (more or less, a saw was after my time so I may be off on the rpm). .....(that rate of fire is for a M-16A1 early version)... An AR-15 is easily modified to full auto, just by replacing the sear pin. (everyone in the firearm community knows this so I am telling no secrets here)

: {>
So far every expert I've heard has been saying it wasn't fully auto but a semi with a completely legal and inexpensive trigger crank. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...hooter-may-have-used-trigger-crank/723236001/
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Well no one saw airplanes being used as a weapon until 9-11. What if that guy had decided to load his Cessna or gulfstream up with fuel and crash that into the crowd?
It would be awful, so we should guard against it... and we do. Pilots and planes are tightly regulated. Why not also regulate gun owners and guns in proportion to the harm they can do?

Or if he didn't own an airplane the same guy could have made a simple launcher and lobbed one to five gallon (napalm) gas cans into such a crowd, horrific and more effective. The point is the guy was dedicated. The ban the guns claims of gun control advocates fails.
If you think that contrived scenario is realistic, you've been watching too many action movies.
 

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
That a few dedicated criminals can still circumvent laws is not an has never been a good reason to not have laws.
napalm_for_law_abiding_citizens_by_i_stamp-d5omzej.gif
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
So our rights are not given by the Constitution or by the government they are given by the Creator ie unalienable.
They are given to us by the constitution. Obviously nature gives us no rights, or all countries would be on equal grounds when it comes to the rights of the citizens. As for "by their Creator," it was made very vague and non-specific so it could apply more than one person and one specific creator; their Creator also reinforcing the secular nature of America as the idea is it is not "the creator," but rather the promise of every citizen to acknowledge their own creator.
Ours (The USA) is the only country in the world with that concept.
Yup. A good number that grant similar, or equivalent, or better rights did so without including any religious connotations at all. They just have their rights. And, really, they aren't rights they're just privileges that the government allows. Tomorrow, something you've been doing you're entire life, thought of as a right, the government can take that away, "creator given" or not.
When rights are giving by the creator it keeps the government etc from taking or changing them as time etc changes.
And that is a problem. For one, the government can and does take them away. Japanese citizens were rounded into concentration camps. Mormons had to fight very hard and persevere through some difficulties to get the recognition and acceptance they have. The Natives often had no rights, nor did black people.
It's also a problem because things change with time. We live in a very different world than they did back in 1776. Today I communicate with people around the world instantly; back then it took weeks and months to communicate with people over such a distance. You also cannot improve things if things don't change, and in this case non-property owning white men, black people, and women have gained the right to vote because things can change. Back then, it also took a good while to reload a gun; today, as recently witnessed, one person could have damaged and army back then in ways never thought of by the people who "a well regulated militia."
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
But you can greatly limit the chances of it happening by sensible legislation.
I'd probably look a reclassification of firearms to include assault rifles and semi automatic weapons with that of machine guns. Not illegal with proper permits, but also instutute a requirement to store them in arms rooms, such as the police department or another secured area where checkout and check in is mandatory.

I dunno why trigger cranks and butt stocks are legal, but would suggest federal restrictions limiting use to law enforcement and military purposes.
 
Top