Okay.I got the stat from the link I posted above.
So you either knew or ought to have known that your post was misleading.I am aware of the population differences of all the countries mentioned, including that of the US, Canada and Australia.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Okay.I got the stat from the link I posted above.
So you either knew or ought to have known that your post was misleading.I am aware of the population differences of all the countries mentioned, including that of the US, Canada and Australia.
For DC and Chicago, you have your causation backward: their gun laws are a response to high murder rates, not the other way around. You wouldn't say that a medicine causes illness just because you see sick people taking it, would you?None of it is giving me any trouble. It's a simple argument. Too simple. Why are you ao certain it would work? What guarantee can you give that it would lower murder rates? Chicago and DC have very strict rules, and they the highest murder rates in the country.
Bottom line: Your proposal won't work.
Ban guns! They are killing people!
The people holding them have nothing to do with it.
This would work because once you remove guns, there is literally no other way for a person incited to kill to do the deed, none!
The point is, your not going to stop people from killing one another. No matter what you do. It's a fact of life.
That's where you're wrong.The point is, your not going to stop people from killing one another. No matter what you do. It's a fact of life.
This is as asinine as saying that being for strict vehicular licensing and safety regulation, both in user competency and restrictions on unsafe vehicles, has nothing to do with the person behind the wheel.The people holding them have nothing to do with it.
Okay.
So you either knew or ought to have known that your post was misleading.
For DC and Chicago, you have your causation backward: their gun laws are a response to high murder rates, not the other way around. You wouldn't say that a medicine causes illness just because you see sick people taking it, would you?
Also:
- none of the gun laws in the US are that strict, even in these cities.
- a single city would be fighting an uphill battle when you can freely - and legally - buy a gun just outside the city limits. Gun control really has to be implemented on a national basis to be effective.
That's not entirely true. Maybe on the short term, but not on the long term.That's where you're wrong.
We can't get the murder rate to zero, but without guns, fewer people kill. The country-by-country stats bear this out.
Only if they are fireworks.So you wouldn't have any qualms if your neighbor manufactured bombs in his garage?
A tiny country of less than 5,000 has a massive per capita murder rate because of a single murder, and this is supposed to mean their gun control laws aren't effective? Yes, this is misleading.Yes, I knew that, but it wasn't at all misleading. You assume too much.
Do you think those laws are properly enforced?It still doesn't explain countries like Russia, Brazil, and Mexico. They have strict national gun laws with much higher murder rates.
No, on both the short and long term: restricting availability of firearms, particularly so-called "defensive" weapons like handguns, lowers no only the rate of firearm deaths, but also the overall murder and suicide rates.That's not entirely true. Maybe on the short term, but not on the long term.
It still doesn't explain countries like Russia, Brazil, and Mexico. They have strict national gun laws with much higher murder rates.
Do you think those laws are properly enforced?
Edit: interestingly, Mexico's suicide rate is less than half of the USA's.
World suicide rates by country
A tiny country of less than 5,000 has a massive per capita murder rate because of a single murder, and this is supposed to mean their gun control laws aren't effective? Yes, this is misleading.
Do you think those laws are enforced properly?
I think your police forces can be as capable as those in Canada if you put your minds to it.I am not privy to the law enforcement strategies of those countries. Do you think such laws can be properly enforced in the US?