Lawyer sends warning to GOP election officials with plans to refuse results

[Shadow Wolf]

Sigh. Y'all are freaking out and Harris is in her honeymoon stage.

The honeymoon stage is actually after inauguration.
And, to get to a reply of yours I haven't yet, if I accepted the one drop thing you'd see me mentioning my Cherokee heritage more than I do. But I don't look it, I know hardly anything about them so I don't often mention it.

 

[Kathryn]

Except she has done that and there's about as much evidence to show she has always embraced being black as there is showing evolution is true.

She's biracial, the daughter of a Jamaican and an Indian.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

She's biracial, the daughter of a Jamaican and an Indian.

Which makes her black and Indian.

 

[Kathryn]

Which makes her black and Indian.

Basically, yes.

 

[fantome profane]

She's biracial, the daughter of a Jamaican and an Indian.

Basically, yes.

And this is exactly the point I have been trying (and admittedly failing) to make. She is Black and Indian. And she has chosen to fully embrace both. She has not choose to half embrace them, she has chosen to fully embrace them. She has fully embraced her Indian heritage, she has fully embraced her Black identity. Not half!

 

[fantome profane]

Rereading is fundamental when something peeves you.
I misunderstood your consideration of a second debate in addition as change from an only.

That is cool, we all read too quickly sometimes and misunderstand. Just glad that we understand each other now.

That said, ....

That said, the offer needs to be made if it is with terms that favor Harris and only do it under her terms, especially if it is on Fox, otherwise one should be enough.

I only partially agree with this. A Presidential candidate ought to be able to debate under a variety of conditions. And I think Harris is up to that challenge. I think she should concede to some of Trumps terms, and also insist on some of her own. Again, I am talking about the hypothetical second debate, the terms for the ABC debate are already set and she should hold fast to them. But for the second debate she should be willing to compromise. For example, allow an audience if that is what Trump wants, but insist on the mics being muted when it is not the candidates turn to talk. She should show Trump she can defeat him under any terms. That shows strength.

 

[Pogo]

That is cool, we all read too quickly sometimes and misunderstand. Just glad that we understand each other now.

That said, ....


I only partially agree with this. A Presidential candidate ought to be able to debate under a variety of conditions. And I think Harris is up to that challenge. I think she should concede to some of Trumps terms, and also insist on some of her own. Again, I am talking about the hypothetical second debate, the terms for the ABC debate are already set and she should hold fast to them. But for the second debate she should be willing to compromise. For example, allow an audience if that is what Trump wants, but insist on the mics being muted when it is not the candidates turn to talk. She should show Trump she can defeat him under any terms. That shows strength.

Maybe with fact checking breaks between questions, otherwise a cage match on Fox would not be any more realistic than professional wrestling.

 

[Pogo]

Maybe with fact checking breaks between questions, otherwise a cage match on Fox would not be any more realistic than professional wrestling.

On another note, I just checked Fox news website, nothing about the debate at all, while it leads on CNN, NYT and WAPO

 

[Kathryn]

And this is exactly the point I have been trying (and admittedly failing) to make. She is Black and Indian. And she has chosen to fully embrace both. She has not choose to half embrace them, she has chosen to fully embrace them. She has fully embraced her Indian heritage, she has fully embraced her Black identity. Not half!

That sounds good to me.

 

[Kathryn]

On another note, I just checked Fox news website, nothing about the debate at all, while it leads on CNN, NYT and WAPO

On Fox, it's old news already. They've already covered the debate. I got a notification about it this morning. (I get notifications from numerous news sites.)

 

[Shadow Wolf]

On Fox, it's old news already. They've already covered the debate. I got a notification about it this morning. (I get notifications from numerous news sites.)

Biden and Trump, not Harris and Trump. And it's going to be very new ground for Trump. Harris isn't Hillary and has undoubtedly learned from Hillary's mistakes (like her deplorables remark).
Add in Trump does nothing but insult and attack his team probably knows it is going to be very hard for him to look good in front of non-MAGAS.

 

[Twilight Hue]

Sigh. Y'all are freaking out and Harris is in her honeymoon stage.

That's an understatement. The derangement and craziness here is absolutely astounding to watch.

 

[Revoltingest]

The real problem Magas have with Harris....
Unlike Biden, she has a great chance of defeating God's Chosen.

But that can't be admitted, so other objections must be invented.

 

[Altfish]

Plus Trump actually shed his blood for this country, and is still running in spite of the constant danger to his life.

That's a hell of a lot more than Harris the chameleon could ever say or claim.

Ha! Private Bone Spurs has never done anything for his country, if it also didn't benefit Trump too.

 

[Altfish]

Harris was not elected as president. But that does not matter she received zero votes in the primary, Biden received enough to become the nominee. I would do a runoff primary of some sort so people in the dem party could have a say in who was their nominee since Biden was kicked out. To make it clear Biden did not decide to drop out he was forced to by the dem elites and donors because they thought he could not win. And installed Harris without any kind of democratic process for their party. So my question is why wouldn't they do this again if it looks like she cannot win?

Do the GOP have 'elites' too? Shouldn't they force Trump out?

 

[Kathryn]

Biden and Trump, not Harris and Trump. And it's going to be very new ground for Trump. Harris isn't Hillary and has undoubtedly learned from Hillary's mistakes (like her deplorables remark).
Add in Trump does nothing but insult and attack his team probably knows it is going to be very hard for him to look good in front of non-MAGAS.

Harris and Trump already made Fox News but whatever you say.

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

Do the GOP have 'elites' too? Shouldn't they force Trump out?

No, Trump was selected through the primary process.

 

[Argentbear]

No, Trump was selected through the primary process.

Yes on July 18, 2024 when delegates to the Republican National Convention voted for him to he the candidate for the Republicans

 

[F1fan]

That is cool, we all read too quickly sometimes and misunderstand. Just glad that we understand each other now.

That said, ....


I only partially agree with this. A Presidential candidate ought to be able to debate under a variety of conditions. And I think Harris is up to that challenge. I think she should concede to some of Trumps terms, and also insist on some of her own. Again, I am talking about the hypothetical second debate, the terms for the ABC debate are already set and she should hold fast to them. But for the second debate she should be willing to compromise. For example, allow an audience if that is what Trump wants, but insist on the mics being muted when it is not the candidates turn to talk. She should show Trump she can defeat him under any terms. That shows strength.

My main concern is a FOX audience that is going to treat the debate like a Trump rally and cheer every lie he says, and boo Harris whenever she corrects him. The only reason Trump wants an audience is to use them against Harris. He knows he can't win a debate against her in a straight, face to face event.

 

[Altfish]

No, Trump was selected through the primary process.

Well, won't Harris undergo the same affirmation, tomorrow?