nutshell said:
AE,
have you finished the movie yet? What did you think?
I was happy to see a movie that portrayed mission movements in a positive light. I was also glad to see the hardships of Mormon missionaries in particular brought into the light -- perhaps folks who see this movie will treat LDS missionaries with a little bit more respect.
It was too "Disney" for me, though. Almost all the problems that the missionary faced were solved at almost the instant that they presented themselves. For example, a native girl wanted to have sex with him, and he convinces her and her mother that he shouldn't do it, and they should both abstain from sex until marriage. He simply says this, and the conflict ends immedeately. He gets a new supervisor who wants paperwork - he types all the paperwork overnight - problem solved. He can't teach a family anymore, so he does it in a prayer. Over and over again, problems come up and are quickly swept under the rug. He cleans up the town drunk...
The only sustained conflict is him missing his girlfriend and his persecution by the local minister.
Some very important conflicts are entirely peripheral: the local girls who board a ship as sex slaves is a prime example.
Some memorable quotes:
New supervisor to missionary: "The house of God is a house of order.... We have forms for this."
Native after a shipwreck: "Sometimes God calms the storm... sometimes God calms the sailor."
I do have a question...
The missionary blesses a boy to heal him, perhaps from death. He writes to his girlfriend, "I helped the God heal a little boy." Is this consistent with Mormon theology or was it an error in the script? Can LDS missionaries help God do anything? Anyway, the statement seemed to contradict what the missionary said when the natives picked up their boy, "I didn't do anything..." = seemingly giving God all the credit.