GeneCosta said:
I know a lot of us don't like to throw around labels, but let's throw caution in the wind for once. Which political label fits you best and why?
Socialist describes to an extent my beliefs on economic issues and social justice. Liberal could be used to characterise my outlook in that I'm live and let live. Anarchist touches on my feelings regarding governance and authority. Green suits me fine in regards to environmental issues. I think all these things and more are quite easily contained in libertarian socialism, which to my knowledge is the best descriptor of my political outlook.
GeneCosta said:
[More precisely, is there anything you hold that is contrary to where you fall on the political spectrum (for example, liberal who supports taking evolution out of the class room).
Some of the ways I differ from people 'on my side' are these:
I'm pro-choice which you'd likely expect. I'm very uneasy about the idea though. I'm not looking for a debate right now, but I find it very difficult to justify abortion in most cases.
I don't dislike the market economy essentially, and I don't believe capitalism is the root of all evil or that private trade is somehow eradicable as many of my comrades do.
I believe most drugs should be decriminalised. Drug disorders are social health problems not criminal ones imo. Drug decriminalisation seems to be fine with people until I mention coke or heroin.
I have less concern for blaming specific governments for problems than blaming governments generally in many cases.
I think the sanctions against Iraq were a greater tradgedy than the inavsion and I do not subscribe to ideas of coalition mistakes in managing the operation. Many of the worst atrocities have parallels to other interventions, and are, I believe, quite deliberate.
I do not believe that the complete obliteration of the Palestinian people is either a conscious motive or unaviodable outcome of the Israeli occupation. I beleive peace will come without genocide on either end.
I don't believe religion is incompatable with science, in such things as the evolution controversy, only ignorance.