Phoenix
Member
I believe that in order to dedicate my life to something, I first must know what it is. I have tried and tried to define God, but I couldn't, save for the following characteristics: Omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent, omnipresent, and incomprehensible.
I find it kind of odd to live for something I can't comprehend. If he's incomprehensible, then he can't be defined, thus making God just another word, such as eraglouyaitonafg or ritzyurntialfy.
If God is omniscient, he knows everything that will happen in the ***ure, including his own. If he knows his ***ure, then it is preset, thus he isn't omnipotent, because he can't change it. If he can change it, then he isn't omniscient, because he doesn't know for sure what our ***ure will be.
If he's omnibenevolent, then evil wouldn't exist. A loving God wouldn't allow all of the torments, tragedy, etc. that we have now. Some attribute that to evil, which is defined as the lack of God. Wait, if he's omnipresent, he's everywhere, thus effectively killing that attribute.
Well, we knocked out five characteristics, leaving us with none. Any other definitions of God would be glady accepted. If God doesn't know everything, can't do everything, allows evil, isn't everywhere, and can't be defined, then what kind of God is he to be devoted to?
Read the following assuming God is omniscient:
God created humans spontaneously knowing that Eve would eat the forbidden fruit and thus release sin into the world. Yet he didn't stop it. If he already knew it would happen, then he couldn't have been testing us. Consider this: I taped the last SuperBowl and watched it 3,000 times over the course of five years, memorizing everything about it. I watch it with a friend and bet my house, car, wife, and money on the losing team. After my friend wins, I get mad at him. Is that logical? Well, God created us, knowing full and well we would sin, then, after a few generations, acted like he was genuinely upset, and flooded the world, killing all humans save for one family. I know more than one righteous family existed back then, so saving one and killing everybody else seems kind of cruel and twisted. He also knows which babies will grow up to be people that go to hell, yet lets them live anyway. Kind of like me knowing a friend would be killed by a mob in two weeks, yet me letting him go on, instead of trying to divert the problem. God could divert it by.. stillborns. Hey, I'd rather have a stillborn if I were a woman than a kid that was doomed to hell to suffer for all eternity. And isn't Revelations a little too harsh? After all the righteous go to heaven, the remaining have to suffer near death and, in my opinion, judgments worse than death. Like, three-fourths, I believe, will die, while the remaining get to live with Jesus for one thousand years. I think some miracles would suffice.. but no! We have to suffer locust plagues, horses that ******e sulfur and fire, global earthquakes, and meteor showers. And even with that, there will remain unbelievers. Omnipotent? I think not.
There's my take on Christianity. Respond as you see fit.
I find it kind of odd to live for something I can't comprehend. If he's incomprehensible, then he can't be defined, thus making God just another word, such as eraglouyaitonafg or ritzyurntialfy.
If God is omniscient, he knows everything that will happen in the ***ure, including his own. If he knows his ***ure, then it is preset, thus he isn't omnipotent, because he can't change it. If he can change it, then he isn't omniscient, because he doesn't know for sure what our ***ure will be.
If he's omnibenevolent, then evil wouldn't exist. A loving God wouldn't allow all of the torments, tragedy, etc. that we have now. Some attribute that to evil, which is defined as the lack of God. Wait, if he's omnipresent, he's everywhere, thus effectively killing that attribute.
Well, we knocked out five characteristics, leaving us with none. Any other definitions of God would be glady accepted. If God doesn't know everything, can't do everything, allows evil, isn't everywhere, and can't be defined, then what kind of God is he to be devoted to?
Read the following assuming God is omniscient:
God created humans spontaneously knowing that Eve would eat the forbidden fruit and thus release sin into the world. Yet he didn't stop it. If he already knew it would happen, then he couldn't have been testing us. Consider this: I taped the last SuperBowl and watched it 3,000 times over the course of five years, memorizing everything about it. I watch it with a friend and bet my house, car, wife, and money on the losing team. After my friend wins, I get mad at him. Is that logical? Well, God created us, knowing full and well we would sin, then, after a few generations, acted like he was genuinely upset, and flooded the world, killing all humans save for one family. I know more than one righteous family existed back then, so saving one and killing everybody else seems kind of cruel and twisted. He also knows which babies will grow up to be people that go to hell, yet lets them live anyway. Kind of like me knowing a friend would be killed by a mob in two weeks, yet me letting him go on, instead of trying to divert the problem. God could divert it by.. stillborns. Hey, I'd rather have a stillborn if I were a woman than a kid that was doomed to hell to suffer for all eternity. And isn't Revelations a little too harsh? After all the righteous go to heaven, the remaining have to suffer near death and, in my opinion, judgments worse than death. Like, three-fourths, I believe, will die, while the remaining get to live with Jesus for one thousand years. I think some miracles would suffice.. but no! We have to suffer locust plagues, horses that ******e sulfur and fire, global earthquakes, and meteor showers. And even with that, there will remain unbelievers. Omnipotent? I think not.
There's my take on Christianity. Respond as you see fit.