• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Let's suppose that when you die... !

Godobeyer

the word "Islam" means "submission" to God
Premium Member
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aisha

A quote:

Aisha was six or seven years old when she was married to Muhammad with the marriage not being consummated until she had reached puberty at the age of nine or ten years old.

In civilized societies, there's a name for people who bang 9 year olds, and it's the opposite of holy. Some messenger of God! :rolleyes:
No body is sure about this.

I can say his marriage with Aicha was for reason she deliver his message to whole the world,most of Hadiths was recite by her.
 

Raahim

مكتوب
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aisha

A quote:

Aisha was six or seven years old when she was married to Muhammad with the marriage not being consummated until she had reached puberty at the age of nine or ten years old.

In civilized societies, there's a name for people who bang 9 year olds, and it's the opposite of holy. Some messenger of God! :rolleyes:

Because Wikipedia is legit source for such things, let me give you a proper source.
 

Wirey

Fartist
Because Wikipedia is legit source for such things, let me give you a proper source.

This has been around far longer than Wikipedia and you know it. He nailed a kid and you believe him when he talks about justice. And the OP wants to know what I'd do if confronted with a harsh reality! This is hilarious!

All followers of Islam who genuinely believe that Mohammed was a vessel of God should ask themselves "Why such a tainted vessel?" And they don't, because such a course of thought would logically lead to the conclusion that there is no God, or if there is, he's not worth following. Especially if you have small daughters.
 

Godobeyer

the word "Islam" means "submission" to God
Premium Member
This has been around far longer than Wikipedia and you know it. He nailed a kid and you believe him when he talks about justice. And the OP wants to know what I'd do if confronted with a harsh reality! This is hilarious!

All followers of Islam who genuinely believe that Mohammed was a vessel of God should ask themselves "Why such a tainted vessel?" And they don't, because such a course of thought would logically lead to the conclusion that there is no God, or if there is, he's not worth following. Especially if you have small daughters.
How you be sure that he married her at 9 old ,if he does how you be sure that he married her to sex with her ?

How about my grandmother married at 13 years old ? and my mother married at 15 old ? she was very mature
 

Raahim

مكتوب
This has been around far longer than Wikipedia and you know it. He nailed a kid and you believe him when he talks about justice. And the OP wants to know what I'd do if confronted with a harsh reality! This is hilarious!

All followers of Islam who genuinely believe that Mohammed was a vessel of God should ask themselves "Why such a tainted vessel?" And they don't, because such a course of thought would logically lead to the conclusion that there is no God, or if there is, he's not worth following. Especially if you have small daughters.

You used Wikipedia as your source which is tragic, any source on Islam that is not Islamic shouldn't be taken in serious analyses.
*EDIT*
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Shad

Veteran Member
You used Wikipedia as your source which is tragic, any source on Islam that is not Islamic shouldn't be taken in serious analyses.
You are a good example of ignorant person that tries to teach Muslims what is in Islam. Inshallah you won't stay blind.

So any source which may contradict established dogma and doctrine is to be ignored. Typical confirmation bias, nothing more.
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
I would be very surprised and ask for the premise for the judgement they are about to make.
I fear that if I'd been good enough I'm going to condemned for eternity with some of the most boring, righteous, d**k heads that have ever graced this planet. Can you imagine having to spend most of the day praising the lord - give me a break!!.
Lucifer sounds more fun, I bet he has a pub down there (though the beer may be a tad warm) and some sweaty clubs where I can watch the latest rebellious punk band or maybe Charlie Parker will be playing.
Then I can seek out Christopher Hitchens, Darwin, George Best, Frank Zappa, Janis Joplin, Poly Styrene, Captain Beefheart, etc., etc.
More time to relax if you are not wasting your effort praising the lord.

No heaven sounds as awful as anything I can imagine.
 

Raahim

مكتوب
So any source which may contradict established dogma and doctrine is to be ignored. Typical confirmation bias, nothing more.

It's not about bias, if I wanted to learn about Spanish history I'd trust Spanish authors & their sources more than for example American.
The same as I'd trust rabbi more than a priest when it comes to the Torah.
 

Wirey

Fartist
You used Wikipedia as your source which is tragic, any source on Islam that is not Islamic shouldn't be taken in serious analyses.
You are a good example of ignorant person that tries to teach Muslims what is in Islam. Inshallah you won't stay blind.

Yes, you believe that a man who had sex with children was speaking to God, and I'm ignorant. Good call.

There's an old saying, "There is no one as blind as he who will not see." When you turn your head from the evidence, you allow tricksters to lie to you.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Basically:

0045778670062.png.925x925_q90.jpg
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Hello all

My question especially to atheists.
M'kay...

Let's imagine that when you die ,you would discover that there is hereafter and judgement day ,and hell and heaven...etc
I already know there is a so-called "afterlife", it's just not anything like Muslims expect. Not to worry, you WILL love it. :D
Unlike your vision of the afterlife, if you don't believe what I am saying nothing horrible will happen to you. :cool:

Seriously what suppose to be would your reactions ?

EDITED to add

I forget to write if you discover that view of Islam about judgement day is true !
Then I'd know that I was hallucinating and that period would soon pass. I've seen a bit too much already to have been so terribly wrong in my outlook. I know I am not. If you ever have the good fortune to have an out-of-body experience you might just begin to understand where I am coming from (pun intended).
 

Parsimony

Well-Known Member
If I found out that Islam was true after I died, I'd be scared. Faced with the prospect of fiery punishment, I don't see how I could not be.
 

Wirey

Fartist
I'd actually be happy. I am filled with hate for my enemies, wish them all dead, can't stand it when women are treated like people, and I like crushing anyone who disagrees with me. All I'd have to do is learn to wipe with my bare hand while I called bacon unclean and I'd fit right in.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
It's not about bias, if I wanted to learn about Spanish history I'd trust Spanish authors & their sources more than for example American.
The same as I'd trust rabbi more than a priest when it comes to the Torah.

Your standards are flawed. One does not need to be of a specific nationality to be an expert on history of said nation or culture. I guess you have never been to any higher education institution to see how this is not a requirement at all. Followers of a group have a greater bias for their views then those not part of said group. Hence why history such as Biblical studies has advanced once religious authorities couldn't invoke their authority on history and treat their religious views as historical facts. A biblical literalist as a historian becomes useless at a point as their ideology creates a bias that all history must be filtered through.
 

Raahim

مكتوب
Your standards are flawed. One does not need to be of a specific nationality to be an expert on history of said nation or culture. I guess you have never been to any higher education institution to see how this is not a requirement at all. Followers of a group have a greater bias for their views then those not part of said group. Hence why history such as Biblical studies has advanced once religious authorities couldn't invoke their authority on history and treat their religious views as historical facts. A biblical literalist as a historian becomes useless at a point as their ideology creates a bias that all history must be filtered through.

If by "higher education" you mean university & similar, you're wrong. :)
 
Top