That doesn't make sense to me.if it is a counter to your post then you, I would think, should be addressing something which addresses your post. If the answer is obvious to you then it is clearly not rhetorical
We all make judgements about which of the many
questions asked here. They take time. (I have many
simultaneous discussions going on.) So we all
eschew the rhetorical ones. If intended to really
seek an answer, then cut us some slack. And try
to differentiate the real ones from the statements.
When murder is a goal of the organization, thereSo there have been no equivalent governmental moves to hold the murderers accountable.
will be no sanctions by the organization against
those using intended methods to achieve the goal.
Thus I expect neither Hamas nor Israel to punish
their soldiers (& settlers) for approved acts.
That responsibility falls to international bodies.
If Israel actually takes any Hamas prisoners, they
should be prosecuted for war or other crimes.
Israel's leaders, soldiers, & settlers should also
be investigated & prosecuted.
Results speak for themselves, ie, Isreal investigatingThen you misread. Israel has a legal system which pursues justice, and it has organizations like Yesh Din which focus on equity and holding Israelis accountable for their crimes against others. If there is no equivalent NGO which advocates for similar justice in Gaza then that speaks for itself.
itself for human rights violations & war crimes
results in continued violations & crimes.
We have that in common.That's a fair thing to wonder. It just so happens that I see many crimes committed by Israelis, including both run of the mill civilians and people who think that, clothed in a uniform, one can do whatever he or she wants. I have also seen behavior that is morally repugnant though it runs afoul of no specific law and I have seen behavior that is within the parameters of modern warfare and within the additional moral strictures the IDF imposes on its soldiers.
USA also has a hideous record of government
allowing & even perpetrating vile crimes.
Shooting an attacker can be reasonable.I had a long chat with my son-in-law about the rules of shooting someone who is throwing a molotov cocktail at you. Much like the fumble/incomplete pass rule in football, before a soldier shoots, the attackers arm has to be moving forward in a throwing motion. Even for a second or third cocktail. I hope that sometimes, he chooses not to wait until the bomb is moving forward when his or others' lives are on the line.
Bombing homes without knowing who's
in them is different....it's evil.
Shooting to kill a rock thrower who is
fleeing is also evil. But this is government
policy. Those who order this, & those
who do it are guilty of war crimes.
IDF begins allowing troops to shoot at fleeing rock-throwers
Military says soldiers are still directed to first try to make an arrest without using deadly force, but experts raise questions about legality of new guideline
www.timesofisrael.com
Last edited: